Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.-83.4%
FIVN
Five9, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.70B
5Y Perf.-78.7%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-48.6%
EGHT
8x8, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$372M
5Y Perf.-81.6%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.-0.3%

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RNG logoRNG
FIVN logoFIVN
NICE logoNICE
EGHT logoEGHT
TWLO logoTWLO
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$4.06B$1.70B$5.78B$372M$29.86B
Revenue (TTM)$2.55B$1.17B$2.95B$728M$5.30B
Net Income (TTM)$84M$57M$612M$-4M$104M
Gross Margin71.6%55.1%66.4%65.7%48.8%
Operating Margin6.5%4.7%21.9%2.6%4.7%
Forward P/E9.4x7.0x8.7x7.3x36.3x
Total Debt$1.48B$847M$164M$410M$1.08B
Cash & Equiv.$133M$232M$379M$88M$682M

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RNG
FIVN
NICE
EGHT
TWLO
StockMay 20May 26Return
RingCentral, Inc. (RNG)10016.6-83.4%
Five9, Inc. (FIVN)10021.3-78.7%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10051.4-48.6%
8x8, Inc. (EGHT)10018.4-81.6%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10099.7-0.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Twilio Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. FIVN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
The Value Angle

RNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIVN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 36.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Income Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
  • Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
  • 20.8% margin vs EGHT's -0.5%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
EGHT
8x8, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EGHT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TWLO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs RNG's 144.3%
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9%
  • +90.3% vs NICE's -40.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWLO logoTWLO13.7% revenue growth vs EGHT's -1.9%
ValueFIVN logoFIVNLower P/E (7.0x vs 36.3x)
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs EGHT's -0.5%
Stability / SafetyNICE logoNICEBeta 0.72 vs FIVN's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TWLO logoTWLO+90.3% vs NICE's -40.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs EGHT's -0.6%, ROIC 13.2% vs 2.5%

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RNGRingCentral, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
96.5%$2.4B
Product and Service, Other
3.5%$88M
FIVNFive9, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
EGHT8x8, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
96.9%$693M
Product and Service, Other
3.1%$22M
TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGEGHT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RNG and NICE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

TWLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 7.3x EGHT's $728M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGHT's -0.5%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$1.2B$2.9B$728M$5.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$376M$140M$845M$48M$415M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$57M$612M-$4M$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$664M$206M$665M$62M$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.6%+55.1%+66.4%+65.7%+48.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.5%+4.7%+21.9%+2.6%+4.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.3%+4.9%+20.8%-0.5%+2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.0%+17.6%+22.6%+8.6%+19.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.3%+9.2%+9.0%+5.0%+20.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.2%+20.0%+56.5%+59.6%+3.8%
Evenly matched — RNG and NICE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NICE and EGHT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.1B$1.7B$5.8B$372M$29.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.4B$2.3B$5.6B$694M$30.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS94.56x48.26x9.89x-12.71x938.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.36x6.96x8.74x7.27x36.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.83x16.84x6.59x12.76x77.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x1.48x1.96x0.52x5.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.46x1.56x2.84x4.03x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.92x8.45x8.22x7.43x28.91x
Evenly matched — NICE and EGHT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs EGHT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+16.4%-2.7%+1.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.6%+3.2%+11.8%-0.6%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.2%+1.7%+13.2%+2.5%+1.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+19.5%+2.2%+16.1%+2.8%+1.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.08x0.04x3.36x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$615M-$216M$322M$399M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$133M$232M$379M$88M$682M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$847M$164M$410M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.57x7.94x0.69x
NICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $922 for EGHT. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +90.3% total return vs NICE's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs FIVN's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+64.8%+18.0%-14.6%+41.3%+42.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.3%-11.9%-40.4%+51.7%+90.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.3%-61.4%-49.3%-8.2%+259.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.3%-87.0%-59.1%-90.8%-35.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.3%+125.4%+50.7%-77.0%+584.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.4%-27.2%-20.2%-2.8%+53.2%
TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NICE and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVN's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs NICE's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x1.79x0.72x1.49x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.57$30.38$180.61$2.88$201.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.59$13.29$94.89$1.56$91.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.5%+73.1%+53.0%+92.7%+97.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.068.140.961.178.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M2.8M631K1.2M2.2M
Evenly matched — NICE and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: RNG as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", EGHT as "Hold", TWLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -17.0% for RNG (target: $38).

MetricRNG logoRNGRingCentral, Inc.FIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.EGHT logoEGHT8x8, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.67$28.40$150.88$19.77$185.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts4241232852
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+8.2%+2.9%+8.5%0.0%+2.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). TWLO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RNG vs FIVN vs NICE vs EGHT vs TWLO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -90. 8% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus EGHT's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Five9, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FIVN is approximately 147% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -1. 9% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 43. 0% for NICE Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -3. 8% for 8x8, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus 2. 1% for EGHT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNG leads at 71. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is RNG or FIVN or NICE or EGHT or TWLO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, FIVN: +125. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RNG and FIVN and NICE and EGHT and TWLO?

These companies operate in different sectors (RNG (Technology) and FIVN (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and EGHT (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; EGHT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RNG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EGHT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RNG and FIVN and NICE and EGHT and TWLO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RNG: 5.3% · FIVN: 9.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(RNG: 3.3% · FIVN: 4.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RNG: 94.6x · FIVN: 48.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.