ROOT vs LMND vs HIPO vs OSCR vs PGR

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 4% for The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (114. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Root, Inc. at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, The Progressive Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) delivered a total return of +107.

3%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGR returned +593. 7% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

07β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately -4017% more volatile than PGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 21. 4% for The Progressive Corporation (PGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hippo Holdings Inc. grew EPS 235. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1865. 9% for Oscar Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGR leads at 14. 2% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIPO leads at 50. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) trades at 12.

0x forward P/E versus 114. 3x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 102. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.

In this comparison, PGR (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. ROOT, LMND, HIPO, OSCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

07), 0. 6% yield, +593. 7% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGR: +593. 7%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ROOT (Financial Services) and LMND (Financial Services) and HIPO (Financial Services) and OSCR (Healthcare) and PGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

PGR pays a dividend while ROOT, LMND, HIPO, OSCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.