Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Consumer Electronics
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $2.98B | $2.92T | $3.13T | $12.50B | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.24B | $742.78B | $318.27B | $6.05B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $90.80B | $125.22B | $4M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 34.9% | 50.6% | 68.3% | 41.3% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 11.5% | 46.8% | -0.2% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 46.5x | 34.8x | 25.3x | 99.1x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $152.99B | $112.18B | $1.93B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $341M | $86.81B | $30.24B | $1.60B | $35.93B |
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3%
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.24 vs AAPL's 1.89
- PEG 1.24 vs 1.89
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs DKNG's 0.1%
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.9%
- 34.0% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 67.4% vs -0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | PEG 1.24 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs DKNG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 67.4% vs -0.9% |
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 1 • RSI leads 1 • AMZN leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 597.9x RSI's $1.2B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $742.8B | $318.3B | $6.1B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $156M | $155.9B | $192.6B | $266M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $90.8B | $125.2B | $4M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | -$2.5B | $72.9B | $612M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +50.6% | +68.3% | +41.3% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +11.5% | +46.8% | -0.2% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +12.2% | +39.3% | +0.1% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -0.3% | +22.9% | +10.1% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.1% | +16.6% | +18.3% | +42.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | +74.8% | +23.4% | +192.9% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMZN and MSFT and DKNG each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 85% valuation discount to RSI's 199.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $2.92T | $3.13T | $12.5B | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $2.98T | $3.21T | $12.8B | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 199.21x | 37.82x | 30.86x | -3113.58x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 46.52x | 34.77x | 25.34x | 99.14x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 1.64x | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.87x | 20.47x | 19.72x | 49.42x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.63x | 4.07x | 11.10x | 2.06x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.70x | 7.14x | 9.15x | 19.81x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.15x | 378.98x | 43.66x | 19.31x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKNG. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs RSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +23.3% | +33.1% | +0.5% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +11.5% | +19.2% | +0.1% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% | +24.9% | -0.9% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +15.3% | +29.7% | -0.6% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.37x | 0.33x | 3.06x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$322M | $66.2B | $81.9B | $330M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $341M | $86.8B | $30.2B | $1.6B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $153.0B | $112.2B | $1.9B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x | 55.65x | 1.92x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs DKNG's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.4% | +19.7% | -10.8% | -29.3% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +138.2% | +43.7% | -2.1% | -27.3% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +766.1% | +156.2% | +39.5% | +4.3% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.9% | +64.8% | +72.5% | -47.9% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.9% | +697.8% | +787.7% | +157.3% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +105.4% | +36.8% | +11.7% | +1.4% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSFT and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.51x | 0.89x | 1.12x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.24 | $278.56 | $555.45 | $48.78 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.50 | $185.01 | $356.28 | $20.46 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +97.3% | +75.8% | +51.7% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 81.1 | 54.0 | 55.1 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 45.5M | 32.5M | 12.9M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RSI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs 9.0% for RSI (target: $30). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.40 | $306.77 | $551.75 | $36.88 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 94 | 81 | 48 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 19 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +6.6% | +2.1% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). AAPL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
RSI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs DKNG vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Rush Street Interactive, Inc. at 199. 2x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -47. 9% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus DKNG's +157. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 71% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 73. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RSI, AMZN, DKNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RSI or AMZN or MSFT or DKNG or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, DKNG: +157. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSI and AMZN and MSFT and DKNG and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (RSI (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while RSI, AMZN, DKNG, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.