Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $825M | $145.00B | $40.77B | $3.72B | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $345M | $12.37B | $33.17B | $1.60B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $1.33B | $5.06B | $163K | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 51.5% | 48.0% | 46.6% | 80.7% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | -9.8% | 13.3% | 18.3% | 2.2% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 60.9x | 8.7x | 15.7x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $188M | $9.99B | $1.77B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $162M | $1.53B | $8.05B | $1.14B | $20.15B |
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 16.8 | -83.2% |
| Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL) | 100 | 18.2 | -81.8% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSKD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs V's 329.1%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
- +18.2% vs PYPL's -32.3%
PYPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.55
BILL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth 185.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.6%
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 50.1% margin vs RSKD's -8.0%
- Beta 0.68 vs SHOP's 2.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs RSKD's -8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.2% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs RSKD's -6.3%, ROIC 29.2% vs -22.2% |
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 4 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • SHOP leads 1 • RSKD leads 0 • BILL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 116.1x RSKD's $345M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RSKD's -8.0%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $345M | $12.4B | $33.2B | $1.6B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $1.7B | $6.7B | $95M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $1.3B | $5.1B | $163,000 | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | $2.1B | $5.5B | $370M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +48.0% | +46.6% | +80.7% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +13.3% | +18.3% | +2.2% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +10.8% | +15.8% | +0.0% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +17.2% | +16.8% | +23.1% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | +34.3% | — | +13.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +15.1% | -6.2% | +2.1% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 95% valuation discount to BILL's 163.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $825M | $145.0B | $40.8B | $3.7B | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $687M | $143.7B | $42.7B | $4.4B | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.81x | 118.87x | 8.54x | 163.57x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.80x | 60.91x | 8.71x | 15.72x | 24.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.06x | 0.97x | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 95.83x | 6.08x | 492.68x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 12.55x | 1.23x | 2.55x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 10.82x | 2.21x | 1.00x | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.94x | 72.25x | 7.33x | 12.02x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-8 for RSKD. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | +10.5% | +25.1% | +0.0% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.3% | +9.0% | +6.3% | +0.0% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.2% | +9.4% | +15.0% | -1.4% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.6% | +11.4% | +18.1% | -1.5% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.49x | 0.45x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$137M | -$1.3B | $1.9B | $633M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $162M | $1.5B | $8.0B | $1.1B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $188M | $10.0B | $1.8B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 19.28x | 1.88x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, SHOP leads with a +18.2% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHOP at 20.2% vs BILL's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | -28.9% | -20.3% | -25.6% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.0% | +18.2% | -32.3% | -19.0% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | +73.6% | -38.4% | -61.4% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | +0.8% | -81.6% | -75.6% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | +4123.0% | +17.4% | +6.0% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +20.2% | -14.9% | -27.2% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. V currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 2.64x | 1.39x | 1.89x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.68 | $182.19 | $79.50 | $57.21 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.70 | $88.14 | $38.46 | $34.44 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +61.3% | +58.1% | +65.8% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 34.7 | 40.9 | 43.8 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 763K | 8.7M | 15.4M | 1.8M | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RSKD as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold", BILL as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, V offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $164.75 | $51.67 | $54.22 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 63 | 70 | 32 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.9% | 0.0% | +14.8% | +11.6% | +2.2% |
V leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
RSKD vs SHOP vs PYPL vs BILL vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. at 163. 6x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 289% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bill. com Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 2% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILL leads at 31. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -8. 0% for Riskified Ltd. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -8. 4% for RSKD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILL leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 52. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V?
In this comparison, V (0.
7% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RSKD, SHOP, BILL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RSKD or SHOP or PYPL or BILL or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +329. 1% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +329. 1%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSKD and SHOP and PYPL and BILL and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (RSKD (Technology) and SHOP (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services) and BILL (Technology) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. V pays a dividend while RSKD, SHOP, PYPL, BILL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.