Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $715K | $70M | $1.50B | $339M | $73.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $410K | $596M | $94M | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-12M | $-88M | $-4.04T | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | -147.0% | 7.6% | 84.6% | 61.8% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | -32.4% | -11.2% | 27.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 3.6x | 2.8x | 15.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $194K | $249M | $595K | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $31M | $241M | $155M | $3.12B |
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scinai Immunotherap… (SCNI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 80.1 | -19.9% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 99.2% revenue growth vs SIGA's -31.8%
- 356.7% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
- 33.1% ROA vs MNOV's -26.3%, ROIC -60.1% vs -85.5%
MNOV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 8.16x
- Beta 0.31 vs NVAX's 2.11
NVAX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- +55.1% vs SCNI's -80.6%
SIGA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 12.7%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 11.83x
- Lower P/E (2.8x vs 15.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, REGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.2% revenue growth vs SIGA's -31.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 356.7% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 12.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.1% vs SCNI's -80.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 33.1% ROA vs MNOV's -26.3%, ROIC -60.1% vs -85.5% |
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCNI leads in 1 of 6 categories
NVAX leads 1 • SIGA leads 1 • MNOV leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.9B annually — 36419.7x MNOV's $409,657. SCNI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, SCNI holds the edge at +36.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $409,657 | $596M | $94M | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$13M | -$47M | $26M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$12M | -$88M | -$4.04T | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$10M | -$96M | $33M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -147.0% | +7.6% | +84.6% | +61.8% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -32.4% | -11.2% | +27.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -29.3% | -14.7% | -43117.4% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | -23.9% | -16.1% | +35.2% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.1% | — | -79.1% | -11.3% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +4.7% | -102.0% | — | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SCNI and SIGA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 79% valuation discount to REGN's 17.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $714,770 | $70M | $1.5B | $339M | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $40M | $1.5B | $185M | $73.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -5.96x | 3.63x | 14.33x | 17.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 2.82x | 15.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.56x | 7.60x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 171.21x | 1.34x | 3.58x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 1.69x | — | 1.70x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 6.96x | 18.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SIGA and REGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCNI delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-29 for MNOV. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCNI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVAX scores 5/9 vs SCNI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.8% | -28.9% | — | -10.7% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.1% | -26.3% | -7.4% | -7.4% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.1% | -85.5% | — | +33.7% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -69.6% | -28.0% | +100.4% | +11.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.00x | — | 0.00x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $606,000 | -$31M | $8M | -$154M | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $31M | $241M | $155M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $194,331 | $249M | $595,169 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | — | -5.10x | — | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $14,365 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for SCNI. Over the past 12 months, NVAX leads with a +55.1% total return vs SCNI's -80.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs SCNI's -69.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.6% | +7.5% | +29.5% | -15.0% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.6% | -4.0% | +55.1% | +1.5% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -34.7% | +23.9% | +22.2% | -5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -65.1% | -94.8% | +1.4% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -80.1% | -90.4% | +764.0% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.6% | -13.2% | +7.4% | +6.9% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNOV and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNOV is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs SCNI's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 0.29x | 2.22x | 1.09x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.18 | $1.96 | $11.97 | $9.62 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $1.17 | $5.80 | $4.29 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.8% | +73.0% | +77.1% | +49.2% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 55.8 | 64.4 | 47.0 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 47K | 4.4M | 688K | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
SIGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVAX as "Buy", SIGA as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, SIGA offers the higher dividend yield at 12.73% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | — | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 23 | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +12.7% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.60 | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +5.4% |
SCNI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NVAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SCNI vs MNOV vs NVAX vs SIGA vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd.
(SCNI) is the stronger pick with 99. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -99. 8% for Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. (SCNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +772. 1% versus SCNI's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NVAX is approximately 656% more volatile than MNOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 28% for Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd.
(SCNI) is pulling ahead at 99. 2% versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -160. 0% for Scinai Immunotherapeutics Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MediciNova, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -32. 4% for MNOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) trades at 2. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 95. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
7% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SCNI, MNOV, NVAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCNI or MNOV or NVAX or SIGA or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 12. 7% yield, +772. 1% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +772. 1%, NVAX: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCNI and MNOV and NVAX and SIGA and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCNI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SIGA pays a dividend while SCNI, MNOV, NVAX, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.