REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $128M | $656M | $3.23B | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $264M | $1.54B | $442M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $61M | $104M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 66.6% | 78.5% | 62.6% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 75.3% | 51.0% | 58.3% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 8.1x | 12.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $488M | $3.29B | $16.16B | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $88M | $453M | $85M |
SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seven Hills Realty … (SEVN) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 114.6 | +14.6% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 40.6 | -59.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 14.7%
- 3.6% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 50.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 0.60, yield 14.7%, current ratio 0.27x
TRTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 123.3%, EPS growth -26.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7%
- +25.7% vs SEVN's -18.1%
BXMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KREF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 15.2% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.9% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs KREF's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.2% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs SEVN's -18.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 5.1% vs 3.4% |
SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
KREF leads 1 • TRTX leads 1 • BXMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEVN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 35.1x SEVN's $44M. SEVN is the more profitable business, keeping 34.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, SEVN holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $264M | $1.5B | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $144M | $948M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $61M | $104M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $96M | $335M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.6% | +78.5% | +62.6% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +75.3% | +51.0% | +58.3% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +23.2% | +6.7% | -23.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +36.4% | +21.8% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | -4.4% | +4.0% | -13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.7% | +58.3% | — | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, SEVN trades at a 72% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEVN's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KREF's 18.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128M | $656M | $3.2B | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $492M | $3.9B | $18.9B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.42x | 14.89x | 29.92x | -6.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.87x | 8.09x | 11.98x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.70x | 15.10x | 16.35x | 18.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 1.97x | 2.12x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 0.63x | 0.93x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.53x | 7.26x | 11.71x | 6.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEVN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. SEVN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRTX scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +5.7% | +2.9% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.4% | +0.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +4.7% | +4.3% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +7.1% | +11.3% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 3.08x | 4.61x | 3.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $364M | $3.2B | $15.7B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $88M | $453M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $488M | $3.3B | $16.2B | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.52x | 1.32x | 1.11x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEVN five years ago would be worth $11,887 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,436 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, TRTX leads with a +25.7% total return vs SEVN's -18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.7% vs KREF's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | -1.0% | +0.7% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.1% | +25.7% | +12.1% | -16.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.7% | +103.4% | +48.1% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | +1.4% | -4.1% | -35.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | -1.9% | +50.5% | -9.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +26.7% | +14.0% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEVN and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KREF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs SEVN's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.78x | 0.74x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.86 | $9.85 | $20.67 | $9.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.90 | $7.44 | $17.67 | $5.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +86.2% | +92.6% | +65.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 60.6 | 47.5 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 655K | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TRTX and KREF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEVN as "Buy", TRTX as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", KREF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.4% upside for SEVN (target: $13) vs 6.4% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, KREF offers the higher dividend yield at 15.21% vs BXMT's 9.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $10.00 | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 18 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.7% | +13.5% | +9.9% | +15.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $1.15 | $1.89 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +3.9% | +3.4% | +10.3% |
SEVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KREF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SEVN vs TRTX vs BXMT vs KREF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the stronger pick with 123. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
On trailing P/E, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is the cheapest at 8.
4x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Seven Hills Realty Trust is actually cheaper at 7. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
Over the past 5 years, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) delivered a total return of +18.
9%, compared to -35. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 5% versus KREF's -9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KREF is approximately 45% more volatile than SEVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is pulling ahead at 123. 3% versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
2% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEVN leads at 76. 3% versus 59. 3% for KREF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) trades at 7.
9x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SEVN: 54. 4% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) offers the highest yield at 15. 2%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is SEVN or TRTX or BXMT or KREF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 14. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEVN: +3. 6%, KREF: -9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEVN and TRTX and BXMT and KREF?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SEVN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.