Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.10B | $5.26B | $3.76B | $4.58B | $7.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $627M | $1.45B | $1.44B | $739M | $2.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-398M | $458M | $181M | $243M | $530M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 65.6% | 60.8% | 70.8% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | -84.2% | 36.0% | 15.7% | 36.8% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 10.8x | 10.6x | 15.8x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $641M | $1.20B | $1.06B | $197M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $380M | $910M | $1.07B | $763M | $1.73B |
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.5 | +84.5% |
| Renasant Corporation (RNST) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Cadence Bank (CADE) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 18.8%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 12.1x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs CADE's 1.41
RNST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth -36.7%
- PEG 1.53 vs HOMB's 3.53
- 39.1% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
Among these 5 stocks, FFIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CADE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 123.1% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- +43.0% vs FFIN's -4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs CADE's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.0% vs FFIN's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • CADE leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • RNST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CADE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 4.6x SFNC's $627M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $627M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $739M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$497M | $601M | $243M | $310M | $722M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$398M | $458M | $181M | $243M | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $755M | $354M | $221M | $290M | $508M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +65.6% | +60.8% | +70.8% | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -84.2% | +36.0% | +15.7% | +36.8% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -63.4% | +27.7% | +12.6% | +30.2% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +71.7% | +29.1% | +16.5% | +39.6% | +26.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +26.0% | +18.6% | -7.7% | -6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 36% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNST offers better value at 2.78x vs HOMB's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $5.3B | $3.8B | $4.6B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $5.5B | $3.7B | $4.0B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.26x | 13.28x | 19.29x | 20.65x | 15.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.38x | 10.75x | 10.64x | 15.83x | 12.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.36x | 2.78x | 3.96x | 4.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.06x | 15.41x | 14.08x | 7.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.95x | 3.62x | 2.60x | 6.20x | 2.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.35x | 0.98x | 2.87x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.90x | 12.45x | 15.81x | 15.65x | 10.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs RNST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | +10.9% | +5.1% | +13.3% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +2.0% | +0.7% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.1% | +7.2% | +4.2% | +11.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | +9.8% | +1.5% | +16.0% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.30x | 0.27x | 0.12x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $261M | $292M | -$15M | -$566M | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $380M | $910M | $1.1B | $763M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $641M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $197M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.01x | 1.44x | 0.49x | 1.48x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CADE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CADE five years ago would be worth $15,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,043 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, CADE leads with a +43.0% total return vs FFIN's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 33.3% vs FFIN's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.0% | -3.6% | +13.5% | +8.0% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.7% | -3.0% | +22.5% | -4.2% | +43.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.4% | +38.4% | +60.5% | +23.6% | +136.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.0% | +6.2% | -0.4% | -29.6% | +55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.3% | +58.2% | +46.0% | +145.2% | +123.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +11.4% | +17.1% | +7.3% | +33.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.82x | 1.03x | 0.95x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.18 | $30.83 | $42.11 | $38.74 | $46.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.00 | $25.68 | $32.63 | $28.11 | $29.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +86.6% | +94.8% | +83.2% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 43.6 | 54.1 | 52.0 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M | 659K | 727K | 80.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", RNST as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", CADE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.99% vs RNST's 2.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.67 | $32.00 | $38.80 | $39.25 | $39.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 19 | 16 | 15 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +2.8% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 21 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $0.75 | $0.83 | $0.72 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SFNC vs HOMB vs RNST vs FFIN vs CADE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Renasant Corporation (RNST) is the stronger pick with 39.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Renasant Corporation wins at 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 53x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
Over the past 5 years, Cadence Bank (CADE) delivered a total return of +55.
3%, compared to -29. 6% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 2% versus SFNC's +26. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 72% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Renasant Corporation (RNST) is pulling ahead at 39.
1% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Renasant Corporation (RNST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 53x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 8% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 1% for Renasant Corporation (RNST).
09Is SFNC or HOMB or RNST or FFIN or CADE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, CADE: +123. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFNC and HOMB and RNST and FFIN and CADE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; RNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.