Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Equipment & Services
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $247M | $12.27B | $6.63B | $7.68B | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.13B | $2.35B | $1.40B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-309M | $128M | $317M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | 93.1% | 69.7% | 81.9% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% | 4.6% | 58.4% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 51.5x | 8.1x | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $78K | $354M | $1.12B | $0.00 | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $199M | $229M | $134M | $1.66B |
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sagimet Biosciences… (SGMT) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 260.5 | +160.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 151.7 | +51.7% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +128.7% vs HIMS's -51.0%
MDGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs HALO's 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 4.01x
- 432.1% revenue growth vs SGMT's -100.0%
HIMS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.56
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 44.2x)
- 22.7% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs SGMT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 44.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.7% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs SGMT's -38.6%, ROIC 73.4% vs -54.5% |
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
SGMT leads 0 • MDGL leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and SGMT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDGL's -27.3%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$57M | -$312M | $164M | $945M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$309M | $128M | $317M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | -$272M | $73M | $645M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +93.1% | +69.7% | +81.9% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.7% | +4.6% | +58.4% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -27.3% | +5.5% | +22.7% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -24.1% | +3.1% | +46.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +126.8% | +28.4% | +51.6% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | +2.1% | -27.3% | -2.1% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $12.3B | $6.6B | $7.7B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $212M | $12.4B | $7.5B | $7.5B | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.84x | -41.62x | 50.32x | 25.46x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 51.51x | 8.09x | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 42.68x | 8.34x | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.80x | 2.82x | 5.50x | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 19.91x | 12.25x | 165.47x | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 89.61x | 11.91x | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. SGMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs SGMT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | -50.2% | +23.7% | +6.5% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.6% | -25.4% | +6.0% | +12.5% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.5% | -29.4% | +10.7% | +73.4% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.6% | -32.9% | +10.9% | +38.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.59x | 2.07x | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$35M | $156M | $892M | -$134M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $199M | $229M | $134M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78,000 | $354M | $1.1B | $0 | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -17.51x | — | 46.08x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SGMT and MDGL and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $41,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,790 for SGMT. Over the past 12 months, SGMT leads with a +128.7% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs SGMT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.5% | -9.9% | -23.2% | -7.3% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +128.7% | +79.0% | -51.0% | -7.1% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | +73.2% | +116.6% | +115.3% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | +310.1% | +137.6% | +37.0% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | +3921.5% | +161.9% | +570.7% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | +20.1% | +29.4% | +29.1% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDGL and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 0.57x | 2.40x | 0.56x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.41 | $615.00 | $70.43 | $82.22 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.08 | $265.00 | $13.74 | $47.50 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +87.0% | +36.4% | +79.3% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 61.2 | 54.5 | 52.4 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 310K | 34.9M | 1.4M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SGMT as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", HALO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs 4.7% for SGMT (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $705.67 | $29.67 | $78.33 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 23 | 19 | 27 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +4.5% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
SGMT vs MDGL vs HIMS vs HALO vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 37. 6% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +310. 1%, compared to -52. 1% for Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus SGMT's -52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 330% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 37. 6% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 50. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SGMT or MDGL or HIMS or HALO or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, SGMT: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGMT and MDGL and HIMS and HALO and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.