Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $145.00B | $3.72B | $40.77B | $113.54B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.37B | $1.60B | $33.17B | $20.12B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.33B | $163K | $5.06B | $4.34B | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 80.7% | 46.6% | 81.2% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 2.2% | 18.3% | 27.1% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 60.9x | 15.7x | 8.7x | 17.5x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $1.77B | $9.99B | $6.64B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.53B | $1.14B | $8.05B | $2.88B | $599M |
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Intuit Inc. (INTU) | 100 | 140.1 | +40.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs INTU's 326.4%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
- +18.2% vs INTU's -35.8%
BILL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth 185.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.6%
Among these 5 stocks, PYPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INTU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.61, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.36x
- 21.6% margin vs BILL's 0.0%
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 17.5x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 17.5x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs BILL's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.2% vs INTU's -35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs BILL's 0.0%, ROIC 16.5% vs -1.4% |
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INTU leads in 2 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • SHOP leads 1 • BILL leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INTU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.2B annually — 20.7x BILL's $1.6B. INTU is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BILL's 0.0%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $1.6B | $33.2B | $20.1B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $95M | $6.7B | $5.9B | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $163,000 | $5.1B | $4.3B | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.1B | $370M | $5.5B | $6.8B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +80.7% | +46.6% | +81.2% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +2.2% | +18.3% | +27.1% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +0.0% | +15.8% | +21.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +23.1% | +16.8% | +34.0% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.3% | +13.5% | — | +17.4% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +2.1% | -6.2% | +47.9% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 95% valuation discount to BILL's 163.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145.0B | $3.7B | $40.8B | $113.5B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $143.7B | $4.4B | $42.7B | $117.3B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 118.87x | 163.57x | 8.54x | 29.76x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.91x | 15.72x | 8.71x | 17.52x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.06x | — | 0.97x | 2.04x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 95.83x | 492.68x | 6.08x | 20.46x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.55x | 2.55x | 1.23x | 6.03x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.82x | 1.00x | 2.21x | 5.84x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.25x | 12.02x | 7.33x | 18.67x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INTU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PYPL delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $0 for BILL. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PYPL's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTU scores 9/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.5% | +0.0% | +25.1% | +22.8% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | +0.0% | +6.3% | +12.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | -1.4% | +15.0% | +16.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | -1.5% | +18.1% | +19.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.45x | 0.49x | 0.34x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $633M | $1.9B | $3.8B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $1.1B | $8.0B | $2.9B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $1.8B | $10.0B | $6.6B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.88x | 19.28x | 428.27x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INTU five years ago would be worth $10,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, SHOP leads with a +18.2% total return vs INTU's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHOP at 20.2% vs BILL's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.9% | -25.6% | -20.3% | -35.0% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.2% | -19.0% | -32.3% | -35.8% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | -61.4% | -38.4% | -1.9% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | -75.6% | -81.6% | +5.9% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4123.0% | +6.0% | +17.4% | +326.4% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.2% | -27.2% | -14.9% | -0.6% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BILL and INTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BILL currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs INTU's 50.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 1.89x | 1.39x | 0.61x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $182.19 | $57.21 | $79.50 | $813.70 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.14 | $34.44 | $38.46 | $342.11 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +65.8% | +58.1% | +50.0% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 43.8 | 40.9 | 44.8 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 1.8M | 15.4M | 3.5M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INTU and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHOP as "Buy", BILL as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold", INTU as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.9% upside for INTU (target: $667) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $164.75 | $54.22 | $51.67 | $666.75 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 63 | 32 | 70 | 43 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +1.0% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | $4.20 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.6% | +14.8% | +2.4% | 0.0% |
INTU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SHOP vs BILL vs PYPL vs INTU vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shopify Inc. (SHOP) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. at 163. 6x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) delivered a total return of +5. 9%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 333% more volatile than INTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bill. com Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILL leads at 31. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 1. 6% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INTU leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 5% for BILL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILL leads at 81. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 53. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INTU: 63. 9% to $666. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), INTU (1. 0% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SHOP, BILL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHOP or BILL or PYPL or INTU or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuit Inc.
(INTU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 1. 0% yield, +326. 4% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTU: +326. 4%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHOP and BILL and PYPL and INTU and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SHOP (Technology) and BILL (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services) and INTU (Technology) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; INTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. INTU, FIS pay a dividend while SHOP, BILL, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.