Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Specialty
Information Technology Services
REIT - Retail
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Specialty | Information Technology Services | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $419M | $30.78B | $13.57B | $2.12B | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $4.05B | $1.56B | $188.60B | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $3.10B | $892M | $12.54B | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 99.2% | 39.1% | 0.2% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | 98.7% | 82.0% | 5.7% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | 110.7x | 9.9x | 15.1x | 41.5x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $7.79B | $0.00 | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $563M | $224M | $330M | $5M |
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
| Gaming and Leisure … (GLPI) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.6%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 146.2%
- 86.6% revenue growth vs VICI's 4.1%
VICI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.19 vs GLPI's 2.99
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.7x), PEG 1.19 vs 1.94
- 76.7% margin vs SKYH's -17.8%
GLPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 6.5%
- 122.5% 10Y total return vs VICI's 118.9%
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.5%, current ratio 9.56x
- 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +62.7% vs SKYH's -11.1%
NNN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 0.19x
- Beta 0.15 vs FLYW's 1.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.6% revenue growth vs VICI's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.7x), PEG 1.19 vs 1.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs SKYH's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs FLYW's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs SKYH's -11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs SKYH's -0.8%, ROIC 7.3% vs 0.4% |
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 3 of 6 categories
SKYH leads 0 • GLPI leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • NNN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 7817.7x SKYH's $24M. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYH's -17.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $4.0B | $1.6B | $188.6B | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $4.0B | $1.5B | $10.8B | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $3.1B | $892M | $12.5B | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $2.5B | $585M | -$15.8B | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +99.2% | +39.1% | +0.2% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | +98.7% | +82.0% | +5.7% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +76.7% | +57.3% | +6.6% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +63.0% | +37.6% | -8.4% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +3.5% | -9.8% | +1408.6% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +60.8% | +38.3% | +4.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VICI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICI offers better value at 1.33x vs GLPI's 3.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $30.8B | $13.6B | $2.1B | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $30.2B | $21.1B | $1.8B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.67x | 11.03x | 16.30x | 161.18x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.88x | 15.06x | 41.52x | 21.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | 3.24x | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.41x | 8.28x | 14.24x | 47.80x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 7.68x | 8.51x | 3.40x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.50x | 1.08x | 2.68x | 2.71x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.27x | 16.45x | 21.41x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLPI delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SKYH. NNN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLPI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs SKYH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +11.0% | +17.9% | +5.9% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +6.7% | +6.9% | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +7.6% | +7.3% | +2.1% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +8.0% | +9.3% | +1.3% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.56x | — | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$563M | $7.6B | -$330M | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $563M | $224M | $330M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $7.8B | $0 | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | 4.45x | 3.28x | 1.84x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SKYH and GLPI and FLYW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLPI five years ago would be worth $13,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,051 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs SKYH's -11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYH at 22.6% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +3.9% | +9.6% | +27.6% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | -3.4% | +9.6% | +62.7% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | +2.9% | +11.0% | -40.1% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +17.4% | +33.8% | -49.5% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +118.9% | +122.5% | -49.5% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | +1.0% | +3.5% | -15.7% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNN is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs SKYH's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.23x | 0.20x | 1.48x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $34.01 | $49.95 | $18.05 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $26.55 | $41.17 | $9.79 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +84.7% | +95.9% | +98.2% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 53.5 | 58.4 | 83.0 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 7.6M | 2.1M | 1.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLPI and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", VICI as "Buy", GLPI as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 45.6% upside for SKYH (target: $15) vs 3.5% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, GLPI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs NNN's 5.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $31.83 | $51.17 | $18.75 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 26 | 27 | 19 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.1% | +6.5% | — | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 1 | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.74 | $3.11 | — | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
VICI leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
SKYH vs VICI vs GLPI vs FLYW vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the stronger pick with 86.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, VICI Properties Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: VICI Properties Inc. wins at 1. 19x versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 's 2. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) delivered a total return of +33. 8%, compared to -49. 5% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLPI returned +123. 3% versus FLYW's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 48β — meaning FLYW is approximately 850% more volatile than NNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 109% versus 156% for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is pulling ahead at 86.
6% versus 4. 1% for VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICI leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 19x versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. 's 2. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 31. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYH: 45. 6% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN?
In this comparison, GLPI (6.
5% yield), VICI (6. 1% yield), NNN (5. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SKYH, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYH or VICI or GLPI or FLYW or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 6. 5% yield, +123. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLPI: +123. 3%, FLYW: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and VICI and GLPI and FLYW and NNN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKYH (Industrials) and VICI (Real Estate) and GLPI (Real Estate) and FLYW (Technology) and NNN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GLPI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VICI, GLPI, NNN pay a dividend while SKYH, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.