Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Regional
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $826M | $60M | $119.19B | $25.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $3.23B | $32M | $69.25B | $19.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $745M | $-60M | $5M | $2.45B | $3.60B |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 87.0% | 63.9% | 47.3% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.9% | 77.1% | 14.4% | 3.3% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 12.3x | 15.6x | 9.8x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $45.71B | $4M | $51.00B | $15.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.24B | $2.10B | $16M | $57.43B | $14.97B |
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 298.9 | +198.9% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 118.1 | +18.1% |
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 29.1%
- 284.8% 10Y total return vs SYF's 176.3%
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 9.8x)
- 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs HFBL's 2.7%
NAVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HFBL's 0.5%
HFBL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.19 vs COF's 1.58, lower leverage
- +57.8% vs SLM's -26.5%
COF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
SYF is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.25 vs HFBL's 4.68
- NIM 15.5% vs NAVI's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs COF's 1.58, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs HFBL's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs SLM's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HFBL's 0.5% |
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SYF leads 2 • HFBL leads 1 • SLM leads 0 • COF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 2141.8x HFBL's $32M. SLM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $3.2B | $32M | $69.3B | $19.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $599M | $544M | $8M | $7.5B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $745M | -$60M | $5M | $2.5B | $3.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $646M | $323M | $8M | $27.7B | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +87.0% | +63.9% | +47.3% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +77.1% | +14.4% | +3.3% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -2.5% | +12.0% | +3.5% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +13.7% | +16.8% | +37.7% | +51.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +9.7% | +63.6% | +22.1% | +20.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, SLM trades at a 86% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs HFBL's 4.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $826M | $60M | $119.2B | $25.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $44.4B | $48M | $112.8B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.55x | -10.85x | 15.56x | 47.77x | 7.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.29x | 12.29x | — | 9.76x | 7.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — | 4.68x | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.14x | 17.81x | 7.98x | 14.95x | 5.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 0.26x | 1.86x | 1.72x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.91x | 0.36x | 1.10x | 0.92x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.80x | 1.87x | 11.11x | 4.56x | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLM delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFBL scores 8/9 vs COF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.0% | -2.5% | +9.3% | +2.4% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -0.1% | +0.8% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +3.8% | +5.9% | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +5.5% | +8.0% | +1.4% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.39x | 19.05x | 0.07x | 0.45x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $43.6B | -$12M | -$6.4B | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $2.1B | $16M | $57.4B | $15.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $45.7B | $4M | $51.0B | $15.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.21x | 0.61x | 0.14x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,915 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +57.8% total return vs SLM's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 41.3% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | -30.0% | +11.6% | -22.0% | -11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.5% | -25.1% | +57.8% | +4.7% | +39.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | -27.8% | +31.2% | +124.7% | +181.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | -30.9% | +33.6% | +30.2% | +72.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +284.8% | +15.3% | +109.8% | +205.6% | +176.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | -10.3% | +9.5% | +31.0% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
HFBL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HFBL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.92x | 0.19x | 1.58x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.97 | $16.07 | $20.00 | $259.64 | $88.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.77 | $7.80 | $12.32 | $174.98 | $53.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +54.7% | +98.0% | +74.2% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 48.5 | 62.4 | 50.3 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 923K | 2K | 4.6M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLM and HFBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLM as "Buy", NAVI as "Hold", COF as "Buy", SYF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs -1.4% for NAVI (target: $9). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 14.91% vs SYF's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $8.67 | — | $267.18 | $90.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 24 | — | 56 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.9% | +7.2% | +2.7% | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.38 | $0.64 | $0.53 | $3.27 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +13.4% | +1.8% | +3.4% | +11.4% |
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SYF leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SLM vs NAVI vs HFBL vs COF vs SYF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLM Corporation (SLM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
On trailing P/E, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the cheapest at 6.
5x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, SLM Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -30. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLM returned +284. 8% versus NAVI's +15. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 729% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SLM Corporation grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
0% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SLM Corporation (SLM) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Navient Corporation — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the highest yield at 14. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Synchrony Financial (SYF).
09Is SLM or NAVI or HFBL or COF or SYF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 7% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +109. 8%, COF: +205. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLM and NAVI and HFBL and COF and SYF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HFBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.