Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
Luxury Goods
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Luxury Goods |
| Market Cap | $219M | $6.12B | $4.08B | $3.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $150M | $995M | $3.94B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $152M | $-1.39B | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | 63.2% | 7.9% | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 17.1% | -9.9% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x | — | 307.7x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $71M | $193M | $463M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $107M | $962M | $151M |
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 103.7 | +3.7% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMRT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -50.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
OPEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +5.1% vs APPF's -20.7%
REAL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 307.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs APPF's -20.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.4% vs -15.8% |
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APPF leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMRT leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • REAL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 26.3x SMRT's $150M. APPF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $150M | $995M | $3.9B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $192M | -$363M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $152M | -$1.4B | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $234M | $1.1B | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.4% | +63.2% | +7.9% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +17.1% | -9.9% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +15.3% | -35.2% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +23.5% | +27.2% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +20.4% | -37.6% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.5% | +37.2% | -50.0% | -150.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — APPF and OPEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, APPF's 34.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $219M | $6.1B | $4.1B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $122M | $6.1B | $3.3B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.56x | 43.83x | -3.13x | -18.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.99x | — | 307.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.66x | — | 430.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 6.44x | 0.93x | 5.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 11.39x | 4.06x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.62x | 3.93x | 195.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. SMRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPEN's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APPF scores 5/9 vs SMRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +30.9% | -163.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.6% | +24.2% | -53.6% | -17.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.6% | +22.4% | -15.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +25.9% | -11.7% | -15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.13x | 0.19x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | -$36M | -$769M | $312M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $107M | $962M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $71M | $193M | $463M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -78.29x | — | -8.92x | -5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — APPF and OPEN and REAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,046 for SMRT. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs APPF's -20.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs SMRT's -24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.9% | -26.2% | -12.4% | -21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.9% | -20.7% | +510.1% | +75.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.5% | +23.4% | +159.5% | +805.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +30.6% | -71.6% | -45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +1277.1% | -50.8% | -57.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.8% | +7.3% | +37.4% | +108.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — APPF and REAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REAL currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 0.71x | 3.09x | 2.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $326.04 | $10.87 | $17.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $142.72 | $0.51 | $4.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.8% | +52.2% | +48.9% | +71.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.9 | 53.2 | 56.2 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 905K | 349K | 36.3M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMRT as "Hold", APPF as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", REAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SMRT (target: $4) vs 22.2% for OPEN (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $236.67 | $6.50 | $18.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 13 | 26 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
APPF leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
SMRT vs APPF vs OPEN vs REAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) offers the better valuation at 43. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
On forward P/E, AppFolio, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -89. 5% for SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus SMRT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 336% more volatile than APPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 19% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RealReal, Inc. grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -39. 8% for SmartRent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPF leads at 16. 1% versus -24. 7% for SMRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REAL leads at 69. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 282. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMRT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMRT or APPF or OPEN or REAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, REAL: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMRT and APPF and OPEN and REAL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMRT (Technology) and APPF (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and REAL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.