Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.-5.9%
LC
LendingClub Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.+8.4%
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.-73.4%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-4.5%
DAVE
Dave Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.35B
5Y Perf.-21.0%

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOFI logoSOFI
LC logoLC
UPST logoUPST
AFRM logoAFRM
DAVE logoDAVE
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
Market Cap$20.40B$1.92B$2.78B$22.44B$3.35B
Revenue (TTM)$4.77B$1.33B$1.08B$3.20B$552M
Net Income (TTM)$481M$136M$49M$382M$225M
Gross Margin75.1%64.7%95.2%62.6%81.5%
Operating Margin11.0%25.0%5.1%10.2%4.9%
Forward P/E26.5x9.6x14.7x62.5x19.1x
Total Debt$1.82B$16M$1.85B$7.85B$75M
Cash & Equiv.$4.93B$918M$657M$1.35B$81M

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOFI
LC
UPST
AFRM
DAVE
StockApr 21May 26Return
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)10094.1-5.9%
LendingClub Corpora… (LC)100108.4+8.4%
Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST)10026.6-73.4%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10095.5-4.5%
Dave Inc. (DAVE)10079.0-21.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DAVE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. LendingClub Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. UPST also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 52.7% 10Y total return vs LC's -27.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
LC
LendingClub Corporation
The Banking Pick

LC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
  • Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
  • NIM 5.4% vs SOFI's 4.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UPST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
Best for: growth
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, AFRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
DAVE
Dave Inc.
The Growth Play

DAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 47.5%, EPS growth 222.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
  • 40.8% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
  • +131.2% vs UPST's -37.6%
  • 49.6% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC 11.1% vs 3.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUPST logoUPST58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
ValueLC logoLCLower P/E (9.6x vs 62.5x)
Quality / MarginsDAVE logoDAVE40.8% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
Stability / SafetyLC logoLCBeta 2.36 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DAVE logoDAVE+131.2% vs UPST's -37.6%
Efficiency (ROA)DAVE logoDAVE49.6% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC 11.1% vs 3.6%

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M
LCLendingClub Corporation
FY 2025
Financial Service
86.3%$373M
Servicing Fees
13.7%$59M
UPSTUpstart Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing Fees, Net
51.7%$157M
Servicing Fees
33.0%$100M
Borrower Fees
9.7%$29M
Collection Agency Fees
4.8%$14M
Other Fees
0.9%$3M
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
DAVEDave Inc.
FY 2025
Subscriptions
99.1%$37M
Other
0.9%$349,000

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLCLAGGINGAFRM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 8.6x DAVE's $552M. DAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 40.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%. On growth, DAVE holds the edge at +36.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.8B$1.3B$1.1B$3.2B$552M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$760M$287M$68M$533M$33M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$481M$136M$49M$382M$225M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.6B-$2.9B-$146M$787M$327M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.1%+64.7%+95.2%+62.6%+81.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.0%+25.0%+5.1%+10.2%+4.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.1%+10.2%+5.0%+11.9%+40.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-83.5%-2.1%-15.4%+24.6%+59.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.8%+36.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-56.7%+3.2%-169.2%+104.1%
DAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
Market CapShares × price$20.4B$1.9B$2.8B$22.4B$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17.3B$1.0B$4.0B$28.9B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS41.03x14.51x64.44x449.07x18.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.45x9.56x14.69x62.49x19.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.75x2.57x50.13x209.99x69.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.28x1.44x2.58x6.96x6.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.91x1.32x3.90x7.48x10.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.29x11.57x
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — LC and DAVE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DAVE delivers a 84.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $85 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.9%+9.5%+6.6%+11.2%+84.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.2%+1.7%+3.1%+49.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+17.3%+1.7%-0.7%+11.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.2%+3.3%+2.4%-0.9%+12.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.01x2.32x2.56x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3.1B-$902M$1.2B$6.5B-$5M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.9B$918M$657M$1.4B$81M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.8B$16M$1.9B$7.9B$75M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.45x0.67x1.66x1.88x22.86x
Evenly matched — LC and DAVE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, DAVE leads with a +131.2% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAVE at 2.6% vs UPST's 29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-41.7%-12.7%-36.7%-9.0%+13.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.0%+62.4%-37.6%+30.7%+131.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+192.5%+142.9%+116.7%+464.2%+4740.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.1%+15.1%-69.8%+24.7%-20.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.7%-27.7%-1.6%-30.7%-20.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+43.0%+34.4%+29.4%+78.0%+2.6%
DAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LC and DAVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LC is the less volatile stock with a 2.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAVE currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.54x2.36x2.96x2.72x2.69x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.73$21.67$87.30$100.00$287.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.56$9.70$23.96$42.09$105.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.9%+77.0%+33.2%+67.4%+86.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.957.442.763.151.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded65.8M2.1M4.8M5.3M607K
Evenly matched — LC and DAVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SOFI as "Hold", LC as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy", DAVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for UPST (target: $45) vs 19.9% for AFRM (target: $81).

MetricSOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …DAVE logoDAVEDave Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.89$22.75$45.17$80.77$309.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts2729223311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%0.0%+1.1%+1.3%
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

DAVE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallLendingClub Corporation (LC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOFI vs LC vs UPST vs AFRM vs DAVE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.

5x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, LendingClub Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.

(AFRM) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

36β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 25% more volatile than LC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dave Inc. grew EPS 222. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAVE leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

Dave Inc.

(DAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 3% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingClub Corporation (LC) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPST: 55. 8% to $45. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SOFI or LC or UPST or AFRM or DAVE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.

(SOFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOFI: +52. 7%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOFI and LC and UPST and AFRM and DAVE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SOFI (Financial Services) and LC (Financial Services) and UPST (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology) and DAVE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DAVE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LC

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DAVE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOFI and LC and UPST and AFRM and DAVE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOFI: 28.8% · LC: 15.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SOFI: 10.1% · LC: 10.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SOFI: 41.0x · LC: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.