REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Lodging
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $46M | $132.72B | $84.21B | $93.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $27.69B | $12.65B | $26.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-310K | $6.15B | $2.52B | $2.58B |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 100.0% | 82.9% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.6% | 34.3% | 20.5% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.3x | 28.3x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $340M | $19.29B | $2.07B | $17.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $17.20B | $6.56B | $358M |
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO) | 100 | 90.0 | -10.0% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 224.6 | +124.6% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 88.1 | -11.9% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 239.0 | +139.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 18.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.47x
- Beta 0.52, yield 18.3%, current ratio 1.47x
- Beta 0.52 vs ABNB's 1.33
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 13.4% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3%
- Lower P/E (16.3x vs 30.4x)
- 22.2% margin vs SOHO's -0.2%
ABNB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MAR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 430.3% 10Y total return vs BKNG's 250.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs SOHO's -0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ABNB's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 18.3% yield, vs MAR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.2% vs BKNG's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs SOHO's -0.1% |
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SOHO leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKNG leads 1 • ABNB leads 1 • MAR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 154.6x SOHO's $179M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOHO's -0.2%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $27.7B | $12.6B | $26.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $10.2B | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$310,423 | $6.2B | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $9.0B | $4.5B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +100.0% | +82.9% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +34.3% | +20.5% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +22.2% | +19.9% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +32.6% | +36.0% | +11.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | +16.2% | +17.9% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +2.4% | +4.0% | +0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SOHO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.9x trailing earnings, BKNG trades at a 30% valuation discount to MAR's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SOHO's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $132.7B | $84.2B | $93.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $379M | $134.8B | $79.7B | $110.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | 25.87x | 34.85x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.32x | 28.35x | 30.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.47x | 13.41x | 31.33x | 24.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 4.93x | 6.88x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | — | 10.67x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.78x | 14.61x | 18.12x | 35.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB delivers a 31.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-1 for SOHO. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOHO's 8.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs SOHO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | — | +31.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +21.1% | +10.2% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | — | +50.6% | +25.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +75.4% | +26.3% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.18x | — | 0.25x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $333M | $2.1B | -$4.5B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $17.2B | $6.6B | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $340M | $19.3B | $2.1B | $17.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | 7.21x | — | 5.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $24,578 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,637 for SOHO. Over the past 12 months, SOHO leads with a +199.2% total return vs BKNG's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAR at 26.4% vs ABNB's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -19.4% | +5.6% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +199.2% | -16.8% | +14.1% | +38.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | +65.4% | +11.8% | +101.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.6% | +87.6% | -7.1% | +145.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | +250.7% | -2.9% | +430.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | +18.3% | +3.8% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SOHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOHO currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.74x | 1.33x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.25 | $5129.83 | $147.25 | $380.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $150.62 | $110.81 | $250.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +3.3% | +95.4% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 42.4 | 56.2 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 8.7M | 3.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SOHO and MAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKNG as "Buy", ABNB as "Hold", MAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). For income investors, SOHO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.26% vs MAR's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $231.72 | $145.44 | $372.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 71 | 44 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.3% | +0.9% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $1.53 | — | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.9% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
SOHO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). BKNG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SOHO vs BKNG vs ABNB vs MAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
On trailing P/E, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the cheapest at 25. 9x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Booking Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to -33. 6% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +430. 3% versus SOHO's -26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABNB is approximately 156% more volatile than SOHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 8% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -54. 5% for Sotherly Hotels Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKNG leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 0. 7% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 11. 4% for SOHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for Marriott International, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 35. 3% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR?
In this comparison, SOHO (18.
3% yield), BKNG (0. 9% yield), MAR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ABNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOHO or BKNG or ABNB or MAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.
(SOHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 18. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOHO: -26. 4%, ABNB: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOHO and BKNG and ABNB and MAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOHO (Real Estate) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical) and MAR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SOHO, BKNG, MAR pay a dividend while ABNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.