Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.80B | $4.64B | $4.19B | $696M | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $600M | $739M | $1.89B | $315M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $243M | $392M | $69M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 70.3% | 70.8% | 67.4% | 69.6% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 36.8% | 25.7% | 25.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 16.0x | 10.8x | 9.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $341M | $197M | $1.30B | $117M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $69M | $763M | $271M | $52M | $185M |
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Source Corporat… (SRCE) | 100 | 213.4 | +113.4% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 194.4 | +94.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 244.6 | +144.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRCE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 12.62x
- PEG 0.71 vs FFIN's 3.07
- NIM 3.8% vs FFIN's 3.1%
- PEG 0.71 vs 1.54
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1%
- +31.9% vs FFIN's -2.5%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 185.0% 10Y total return vs SRCE's 155.7%
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.1%, current ratio 370.62x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | PEG 0.71 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.9% vs FFIN's -2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • FULT leads 1 • SRCE leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.0x IBCP's $315M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 19.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $600M | $739M | $1.9B | $315M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $310M | $529M | $89M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $243M | $392M | $69M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $152M | $290M | $267M | $70M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +70.8% | +67.4% | +69.6% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +36.8% | +25.7% | +25.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +30.2% | +20.7% | +21.7% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +39.6% | +15.0% | +22.2% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | -7.7% | +47.2% | +2.3% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 51% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SRCE offers better value at 0.75x vs FFIN's 4.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $4.6B | $4.2B | $696M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.1B | $5.2B | $761M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.43x | 20.90x | 10.48x | 10.34x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.88x | 16.02x | 10.78x | 9.52x | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 4.01x | 0.75x | 1.96x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.66x | 14.27x | 9.86x | 9.36x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.99x | 6.27x | 2.22x | 2.21x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 2.91x | 1.14x | 1.40x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.43x | 15.84x | 14.75x | 9.92x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FULT's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRCE scores 8/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +13.3% | +11.6% | +14.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.6% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +11.0% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +16.0% | +9.5% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.12x | 0.37x | 0.23x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $271M | -$566M | $1.0B | $65M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69M | $763M | $271M | $52M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $341M | $197M | $1.3B | $117M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 1.48x | 0.84x | 0.91x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRCE five years ago would be worth $16,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +31.9% total return vs FFIN's -2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.7% vs FFIN's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.5% | +9.2% | +12.9% | +6.8% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.8% | -2.5% | +31.9% | +12.2% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.2% | +29.9% | +133.8% | +129.8% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -29.0% | +43.3% | +63.0% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.7% | +146.6% | +107.7% | +185.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.7% | +9.1% | +32.7% | +32.0% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SRCE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRCE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRCE currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.95x | 1.13x | 0.83x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.64 | $38.74 | $22.99 | $37.39 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.89 | $28.11 | $16.60 | $29.63 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +84.2% | +94.8% | +90.4% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 55.4 | 53.2 | 47.8 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 146K | 735K | 2.0M | 177K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SRCE and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRCE as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 1.8% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs SRCE's 2.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.00 | $39.25 | $24.00 | $38.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.2% | +3.5% | +3.1% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 30 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.58 | $0.72 | $0.77 | $1.03 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SRCE vs FFIN vs FULT vs IBCP vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: 1st Source Corporation wins at 0. 71x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +185. 0% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 53% more volatile than SRCE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 37% for Fulton Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 1% for 1st Source Corporation (SRCE).
09Is SRCE or FFIN or FULT or IBCP or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 2. 1% yield, +155. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRCE: +155. 7%, FULT: +107. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRCE and FFIN and FULT and IBCP and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRCE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.