Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Agricultural - Machinery
Construction Materials
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $10.40B | $4.22B | $59.14B | $416.75B | $37.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.47B | $2.27B | $16.36B | $70.75B | $8.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $448M | $-68M | $2.51B | $9.42B | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 48.4% | 36.3% | 32.5% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 20.3% | 24.7% | 16.6% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 22.1x | 20.1x | 38.8x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $4.14B | $16.48B | $43.33B | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $15M | $459M | $9.98B | $183M |
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Vulcan Materials Co… (VMC) | 100 | 266.7 | +166.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8%
WSC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%
URI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs CAT's 12.3%
- PEG 0.78 vs VMC's 2.40
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.78 vs 2.40
- 15.3% margin vs WSC's -3.0%
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +181.5% vs WSC's -11.0%
- 10.0% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 15.9% vs 7.4%
VMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.80, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.80 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.78 vs 2.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs WSC's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs WSC's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 15.9% vs 7.4% |
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSC leads 1 • STN leads 0 • URI leads 0 • VMC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WSC and URI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 31.2x WSC's $2.3B. URI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -3.0%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $2.3B | $16.4B | $70.8B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $961M | $735M | $6.5B | $14.0B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $448M | -$68M | $2.5B | $9.4B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $579M | $1.5B | $11.4B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +48.4% | +36.3% | +32.5% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +20.3% | +24.7% | +16.6% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -3.0% | +15.3% | +13.3% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +25.5% | +9.1% | +16.2% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | -2.0% | +7.2% | +22.2% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | -34.8% | +5.6% | +30.2% | +29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WSC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, URI trades at a 49% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs STN's 3.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.4B | $4.2B | $59.1B | $416.8B | $37.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $8.3B | $75.2B | $450.1B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.23x | -80.34x | 24.45x | 47.57x | 35.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 22.07x | 20.14x | 38.79x | 31.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.08x | — | 0.94x | 1.69x | 2.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.59x | 9.08x | 10.61x | 33.41x | 18.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 1.85x | 3.67x | 6.17x | 4.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.82x | 4.96x | 6.80x | 19.71x | 4.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.14x | 5.72x | 89.34x | 40.56x | 33.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-7 for WSC. VMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VMC scores 9/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | -7.1% | +27.9% | +47.5% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -1.2% | +8.4% | +10.0% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +7.4% | +12.4% | +15.9% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +9.2% | +15.6% | +19.1% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 4.84x | 1.84x | 2.03x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $4.1B | $16.0B | $33.4B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $15M | $459M | $10.0B | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $4.1B | $16.5B | $43.3B | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.18x | 0.19x | 5.72x | 9.22x | 4.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,052 for WSC. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs WSC's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs WSC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | +20.0% | +12.0% | +50.2% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.5% | -11.0% | +46.0% | +181.5% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | -46.6% | +182.8% | +324.9% | +52.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.8% | -19.5% | +178.0% | +282.5% | +55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.5% | +144.8% | +1482.5% | +1227.6% | +162.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | -18.9% | +41.4% | +62.0% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and VMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs WSC's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 2.06x | 1.19x | 1.54x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.52 | $31.88 | $1021.47 | $931.35 | $331.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.08 | $14.91 | $647.05 | $318.11 | $252.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +73.1% | +92.4% | +96.2% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 68.4 | 69.4 | 76.2 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 250K | 2.2M | 557K | 2.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STN and WSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STN as "Hold", WSC as "Buy", URI as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", VMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for VMC (target: $327) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, WSC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.07 | $23.67 | $1037.13 | $824.80 | $327.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 13 | 40 | 53 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.28 | $7.18 | $5.86 | $1.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +3.3% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
CAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
STN vs WSC vs URI vs CAT vs VMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). United Rentals, Inc. (URI) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
On trailing P/E, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, United Rentals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Vulcan Materials Company's 2. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -19. 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus WSC's +144. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 158% more volatile than VMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vulcan Materials Company grew EPS 18. 5% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, STN leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 7. 9% for STN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Vulcan Materials Company's 2. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VMC: 13. 2% to $327. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is STN or WSC or URI or CAT or VMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, WSC: +144. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STN and WSC and URI and CAT and VMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (STN (Industrials) and WSC (Industrials) and URI (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and VMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.