Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.14B | $5.32B | $3.13B | $4.64B | $6.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $565M | $1.45B | $627M | $739M | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $140M | $458M | $-398M | $243M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 69.2% | 65.6% | 5.8% | 70.8% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 31.6% | 36.0% | -84.2% | 36.8% | 32.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 10.9x | 10.5x | 16.0x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $480M | $1.20B | $641M | $197M | $921M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $910M | $380M | $763M | $2.54B |
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Yards Bancorp… (SYBT) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 125.9 | +25.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 22.1%
- 213.0% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.1%
- PEG 1.13 vs HOMB's 3.57
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs SYBT's 1.03, lower leverage
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 12.1x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
FFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
UBSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 28.21x
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.4%, current ratio 28.21x
- +29.3% vs FFIN's -2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SYBT's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.3% vs FFIN's -2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • SYBT leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • UBSI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.2x SYBT's $565M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $565M | $1.5B | $627M | $739M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $182M | $601M | -$497M | $310M | $590M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $140M | $458M | -$398M | $243M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $354M | $755M | $290M | $487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.2% | +65.6% | +5.8% | +70.8% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +36.0% | -84.2% | +36.8% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +27.7% | -63.4% | +30.2% | +25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +29.1% | +71.7% | +39.6% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | +26.0% | +42.1% | -7.7% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, UBSI trades at a 36% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYBT offers better value at 1.18x vs HOMB's 4.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $5.3B | $3.1B | $4.6B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $5.6B | $3.4B | $4.1B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.24x | 13.45x | -7.32x | 20.90x | 13.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.58x | 10.89x | 10.46x | 16.02x | 12.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 4.42x | — | 4.01x | 2.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.28x | 10.18x | — | 14.27x | 7.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.78x | 3.67x | 4.99x | 6.27x | 3.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 1.37x | 0.85x | 2.91x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.87x | 12.61x | 6.95x | 15.84x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYBT delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYBT's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYBT scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +10.9% | -11.6% | +13.3% | +8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +2.0% | -1.6% | +1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +7.2% | -9.1% | +11.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +9.8% | -4.2% | +16.0% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.30x | 0.19x | 0.12x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $409M | $292M | $261M | -$566M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $910M | $380M | $763M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $480M | $1.2B | $641M | $197M | $921M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 1.44x | -1.01x | 1.48x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYBT five years ago would be worth $15,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, UBSI leads with a +29.3% total return vs FFIN's -2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYBT at 19.9% vs FFIN's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.5% | -2.4% | +15.9% | +9.2% | +14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.8% | -1.3% | +17.7% | -2.5% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.4% | +42.8% | +54.9% | +29.9% | +62.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.2% | +7.6% | -14.9% | -29.0% | +25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.0% | +58.1% | +26.4% | +146.6% | +54.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.9% | +12.6% | +15.7% | +9.1% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYBT's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.95x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $83.83 | $30.83 | $22.18 | $38.74 | $45.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.51 | $25.68 | $17.00 | $28.11 | $34.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +87.7% | +97.3% | +84.2% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 45.9 | 60.2 | 55.4 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 173K | 1.5M | 1.2M | 735K | 914K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYBT as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", UBSI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 5.0% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs SYBT's 1.74%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.50 | $32.00 | $22.67 | $39.25 | $46.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.8% | +4.0% | +2.2% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.26 | $0.75 | $0.85 | $0.72 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SYBT vs HOMB vs SFNC vs FFIN vs UBSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
On trailing P/E, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
Over the past 5 years, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
(SYBT) delivered a total return of +51. 2%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYBT returned +213. 0% versus SFNC's +26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning SYBT is approximately 26% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 45% for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 22. 1% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (SYBT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (SYBT).
09Is SYBT or HOMB or SFNC or FFIN or UBSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 1%, SFNC: +26. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SYBT and HOMB and SFNC and FFIN and UBSI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SYBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.