Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $750M | $620.85B | $364.18B | $140.02B | $53.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54K | $323.90B | $184.43B | $58.31B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $28.84B | $12.30B | $7.32B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | -10.5% | 21.7% | 30.4% | 29.2% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | -617.2% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 18.3% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 14.7x | 12.6x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $43.54B | $46.74B | $23.44B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $10.68B | $6.47B | $6.50B | $1.99B |
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tamboran Resources … (TBN) | 100 | 158.4 | +58.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 84.1 | -15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +75.2% vs COP's +34.7%
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 6.4% ROA vs TBN's -5.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs -9.2%
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
- 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
COP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 233.4% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
- 7.5% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
OXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 14.7x)
- 20.3% margin vs TBN's -585.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs TBN's -585.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs TBN's 0.11 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.2% vs COP's +34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs TBN's -5.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs -9.2% |
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TBN leads in 1 of 6 categories
XOM leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • COP leads 0 • OXY leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COP and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 5998240.7x TBN's $54,000. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBN's -585.8%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54,000 | $323.9B | $184.4B | $58.3B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $59.9B | $37.1B | $22.4B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $28.8B | $12.3B | $7.3B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $23.6B | $16.2B | $18.3B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +21.7% | +30.4% | +29.2% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -617.2% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +18.3% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -585.8% | +8.9% | +6.7% | +12.6% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1786.7% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +31.4% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.3% | -5.3% | -2.5% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.0% | -24.5% | -20.2% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TBN and OXY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, COP trades at a 46% valuation discount to OXY's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OXY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $750M | $620.8B | $364.2B | $140.0B | $53.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $653.7B | $404.5B | $157.0B | $75.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 21.86x | 27.53x | 18.09x | 33.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.31x | 14.68x | 12.62x | 11.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.91x | 10.89x | 6.77x | 6.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.92x | 1.97x | 2.38x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 2.37x | 1.76x | 2.23x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x | 21.95x | 8.35x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TBN and COP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OXY delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TBN. TBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OXY's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COP scores 6/9 vs TBN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.4% | +10.7% | +7.2% | +11.3% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | +8.6% | +6.2% | +10.4% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.5% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +10.4% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 0.36x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $32.9B | $40.3B | $16.9B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $6.5B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $43.5B | $46.7B | $23.4B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.11x | 69.44x | 17.22x | 9.42x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TBN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,322 for TBN. Over the past 12 months, TBN leads with a +75.2% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TBN at 17.7% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +19.7% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.2% | +43.9% | +39.5% | +34.7% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | +44.9% | +26.7% | +23.7% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | +164.6% | +94.0% | +131.9% | +109.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.2% | +105.0% | +135.8% | +233.4% | -7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +13.2% | +8.2% | +7.3% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVX and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBN's 0.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVX currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs TBN's 68.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | -0.20x | -0.11x | 0.01x | -0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.21 | $176.41 | $214.71 | $135.87 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.29 | $101.19 | $133.77 | $84.28 | $38.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.0% | +83.0% | +85.0% | +84.6% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 42.4 | 42.1 | 43.4 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 18.9M | 11.0M | 9.6M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBN as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", COP as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.8% upside for TBN (target: $45) vs 6.8% for CVX (target: $195). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $161.08 | $194.87 | $126.77 | $60.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 55 | 53 | 52 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +3.8% | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 26 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 | $6.87 | $3.19 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% | +3.6% | 0.0% |
TBN leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.
TBN vs XOM vs CVX vs COP vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
On trailing P/E, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Occidental Petroleum Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to +63. 2% for Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +230. 8% versus OXY's -8. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
25β versus Tamboran Resources Corp's 0. 05β — meaning TBN is approximately -118% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tamboran Resources Corp (TBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 65% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConocoPhillips (COP) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -144650. 7% for Tamboran Resources Corp. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
ConocoPhillips (COP) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
6% net margin versus -585. 8% for Tamboran Resources Corp — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COP leads at 19. 6% versus -617. 2% for TBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) trades at 11.
4x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Chevron Corporation — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TBN: 26. 8% to $45. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY?
In this comparison, CVX (3.
8% yield), OXY (3. 0% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), XOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBN or XOM or CVX or COP or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 7% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +102. 6%, TBN: +63. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBN and XOM and CVX and COP and OXY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. XOM, CVX, COP, OXY pay a dividend while TBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.