Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Medical - Equipment & Services
Packaged Foods
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Household & Personal Products | Medical - Equipment & Services | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $387M | $9M | $6.63B | $430M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $347M | $110M | $2.35B | $490M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-2M | $128M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 75.1% | 69.7% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 0.5% | 4.6% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 3.5x | 51.5x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $167M | $7M | $1.12B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $11M | $229M | $94M |
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TruBridge, Inc. (TBRG) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Nature's Sunshine P… (NATR) | 100 | 253.1 | +153.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBRG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MTEX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 21.9x)
- Beta 0.27 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7%
- 5.5% margin vs MTEX's -1.5%
NATR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.62
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 11.7%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.62, current ratio 2.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs MTEX's -1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs MTEX's -4.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 17.3% |
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NATR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MTEX leads 1 • TBRG leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TBRG and MTEX and HIMS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 21.3x MTEX's $110M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTEX's -1.5%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $347M | $110M | $2.3B | $490M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $2M | $164M | $38M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$2M | $128M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | -$4M | $73M | $23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +75.1% | +69.7% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +0.5% | +4.6% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -1.5% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -3.6% | +3.1% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -8.1% | +28.4% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.2% | +6.9% | -27.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MTEX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, MTEX trades at a 96% valuation discount to TBRG's 88.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEX's 1.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $387M | $9M | $6.6B | $430M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $529M | $4M | $7.5B | $355M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 88.90x | 3.54x | 50.32x | 23.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.14x | — | 51.51x | 21.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.81x | 1.41x | 42.68x | 9.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 0.08x | 2.82x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.10x | 1.02x | 12.25x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.85x | 4.52x | 89.61x | 14.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. NATR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBRG scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -23.8% | +23.7% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -4.9% | +6.0% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +17.3% | +10.7% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +9.3% | +10.9% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.78x | 2.07x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | -$5M | $892M | -$75M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $11M | $229M | $94M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167M | $7M | $1.1B | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | 0.38x | — | 1100.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,901 for MTEX. Over the past 12 months, NATR leads with a +85.3% total return vs MTEX's -53.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATR at 31.8% vs MTEX's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.3% | -44.1% | -23.2% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | -53.3% | -51.0% | +85.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.5% | -63.8% | +116.6% | +129.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | -61.0% | +137.6% | +18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -35.2% | +161.9% | +180.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | -28.8% | +29.4% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TBRG and MTEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBRG currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.27x | 2.40x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.68 | $12.45 | $70.43 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.88 | $4.20 | $13.74 | $12.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +37.5% | +36.4% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.2 | 43.6 | 54.5 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 299K | 10K | 34.9M | 103K |
Analyst Outlook
NATR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBRG as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", NATR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs -20.6% for NATR (target: $20).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.44 | — | $29.67 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | — | 19 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +3.8% |
NATR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MTEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TBRG vs MTEX vs HIMS vs NATR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
On trailing P/E, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the cheapest at 3.
5x versus TruBridge, Inc. at 88. 9x. On forward P/E, TruBridge, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -61. 0% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATR returned +180. 2% versus TBRG's -36. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 797% more volatile than MTEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mannatech, Incorporated grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus 1. 3% for TruBridge, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TBRG leads at 9. 7% versus 1. 2% for MTEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTEX leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TruBridge, Inc.
(TBRG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 15. 6% to $29. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TBRG or MTEX or HIMS or NATR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTEX: -35. 2%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBRG and MTEX and HIMS and NATR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TBRG (Healthcare) and MTEX (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and NATR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TBRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.