Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $1.63B | $2.78B | $10.28B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $516M | $533M | $643M | $3.36B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $122M | $209M | $537M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 75.9% | 79.9% | 57.1% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 31.7% | 43.8% | 19.8% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 41.0x | 12.0x | 14.2x | 13.0x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $80M | $991M | $4.45B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $248M | $157M | $108M | $1.43B | $52M |
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triumph Financial, … (TFIN) | 100 | 276.5 | +176.5% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 72.2%
- NIM 5.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
TCBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 41.0x)
CVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFIN's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFIN's 0.8%
BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- +44.8% vs IBCP's +12.6%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs TFIN's 460.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 41.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFIN's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs TFIN's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFIN's 0.8% |
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
TFIN leads 0 • TCBK leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TFIN and CVBF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 10.7x IBCP's $315M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFIN's 4.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $516M | $533M | $643M | $3.4B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $183M | $294M | $797M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $122M | $209M | $537M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $124M | $217M | $1.5B | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +75.9% | +79.9% | +57.1% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +31.7% | +43.8% | +19.8% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +22.8% | +32.5% | +15.6% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +24.0% | +33.8% | +42.6% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +17.0% | +11.1% | +1.8% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 86% valuation discount to TFIN's 73.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCBK offers better value at 1.20x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.6B | $2.8B | $10.3B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $1.6B | $3.7B | $13.3B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 73.00x | 13.70x | 13.49x | 16.39x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.00x | 12.05x | 14.24x | 13.05x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.20x | 4.25x | 5.51x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.58x | 8.52x | 13.02x | 17.23x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 3.06x | 4.33x | 3.06x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 1.25x | 1.21x | 1.53x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.93x | 12.77x | 12.81x | 7.19x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TFIN and TCBK and IBCP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for TFIN. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs TFIN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +9.4% | +9.3% | +8.9% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +8.9% | +6.8% | +4.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +10.8% | +9.3% | +5.5% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.06x | 0.43x | 0.80x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$248M | -$77M | $883M | $3.0B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $248M | $157M | $108M | $1.4B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $80M | $991M | $4.5B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 35.16x | 1.41x | 2.12x | 0.55x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,469 for TFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs TFIN's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +8.5% | +10.9% | +13.0% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.3% | +33.5% | +13.1% | +44.8% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.8% | +78.3% | +94.0% | +79.4% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +21.6% | +12.2% | +59.4% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +460.5% | +129.4% | +67.6% | +168.5% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.3% | +21.3% | +24.7% | +21.5% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TCBK and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TFIN's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCBK currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs TFIN's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 0.93x | 0.94x | 1.03x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.84 | $53.18 | $21.48 | $139.73 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.43 | $36.32 | $17.95 | $91.35 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +95.6% | +95.5% | +95.5% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 57.2 | 57.9 | 58.9 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 252K | 142K | 1.6M | 317K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and BOKF and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TFIN as "Hold", TCBK as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs TFIN's 0.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $57.33 | $24.75 | $131.57 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.7% | +4.0% | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $1.38 | $0.82 | $2.24 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.0% | +2.9% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
TFIN vs TCBK vs CVBF vs BOKF vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Triumph Financial, Inc. at 73. 0x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TriCo Bancshares wins at 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -25. 3% for Triumph Financial, Inc. (TFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TFIN returned +460. 5% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Triumph Financial, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning TFIN is approximately 72% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Triumph Financial, Inc. grew EPS 72. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 4. 9% for Triumph Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 6. 4% for TFIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TFIN leads at 83. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 0x for Triumph Financial, Inc. — 31. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Triumph Financial, Inc. (TFIN).
09Is TFIN or TCBK or CVBF or BOKF or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, TFIN: +460. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TFIN and TCBK and CVBF and BOKF and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. TCBK, CVBF, BOKF, IBCP pay a dividend while TFIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.