TKLF
Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.
Household & Personal Products
Market Cap$887K
5Y Perf.-95.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CANG
Cango Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-67.5%
KOSS
Koss Corporation
Consumer Electronics
Market Cap$40M
5Y Perf.-49.9%
DXLG
Destination XL Group, Inc.
Apparel - Retail
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-85.6%
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$228M
5Y Perf.-71.0%
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TKLF | CANG | KOSS | DXLG | LOVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Auto - Dealerships | Consumer Electronics | Apparel - Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $887K | $250M | $40M | $35M | $228M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $390M | $3.46B | $13M | $442M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.00B | $-178M | $-871K | $-8M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 11.4% | 13.6% | 36.4% | 44.4% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 7.3% | -15.8% | -2.3% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 5.7x | — | — | 25.7x |
| Total Debt | $10.69B | $170M | $3M | $0.00 | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $721M | $1.29B | $3M | $24M | $84M |
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TKLF
CANG
KOSS
DXLG
LOVE
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo Lifestyle Co.… (TKLF) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 14.4 | -85.6% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TKLF leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Koss Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TKLF
Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.
The Growth Play
TKLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 159.7%, EPS growth 152.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 411.6%
- 159.7% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 3.2% margin vs KOSS's -6.8%
Best for: growth exposure
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick
CANG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
Best for: income & stability
KOSS
Koss Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
KOSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 91.0% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 8.3%, current ratio 11.65x
- Beta 1.62, current ratio 11.65x
- -10.6% vs CANG's -73.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
DXLG
Destination XL Group, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
DXLG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKLF | 159.7% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% |
| Value | TKLF | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | TKLF | 3.2% margin vs KOSS's -6.8% |
| Stability / Safety | TKLF | Beta 0.76 vs DXLG's 2.30 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | KOSS | -10.6% vs CANG's -73.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TKLF | 4.2% ROA vs KOSS's -2.3%, ROIC 6.4% vs -4.2% |
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTKLFLAGGINGLOVE
Who Leads Where
TKLF leads in 3 of 6 categories
KOSS leads 1 • CANG leads 1 • DXLG leads 0 • LOVE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓LOVEThe Lovesac Company
0leads
DXLGDestination XL Group,…
0leads
KOSSKoss Corporation
1leads
CANGCango Inc.
1leads
TKLFTokyo Lifestyle Co., …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CANGvs KOSSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TKLF4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TKLF2/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TKLF5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KOSS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CANG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 270.3x KOSS's $13M. TKLF is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KOSS's -6.8%. On growth, TKLF holds the edge at +256.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $390M | $3.5B | $13M | $442M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $333M | -$2M | $5M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$178M | -$871,116 | -$8M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$237M | $0 | -$546,651 | -$11M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +13.6% | +36.4% | +44.4% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +7.3% | -15.8% | -2.3% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -5.2% | -6.8% | -1.7% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -154.0% | -4.3% | -2.6% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +256.9% | +58.3% | -19.6% | -5.2% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2135.4% | +3.6% | — | -137.7% | -18.4% |
TKLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TKLF leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, TKLF trades at a 100% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOVE's 11.5x.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $886,624 | $250M | $40M | $35M | $228M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $85M | $39M | $11M | $327M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 5.66x | -44.78x | -0.97x | 22.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 25.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.63x | 3.13x | — | — | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 2.12x | 3.14x | 0.08x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.42x | 1.28x | 0.32x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 18.82x | 13.06x |
TKLF leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKLF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKLF delivers a 15.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-5 for DXLG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TKLF's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KOSS scores 5/9 vs DXLG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | -4.1% | -2.8% | -5.5% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | -2.3% | -2.3% | -1.9% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +4.6% | -4.2% | -6.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +4.5% | -4.9% | -6.4% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.04x | 0.08x | — | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.0B | -$1.1B | -$266,063 | -$24M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $721M | $1.3B | $3M | $24M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.7B | $170M | $3M | $0 | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.77x | -1.87x | -1972.72x | — | — |
TKLF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $71 for TKLF. Over the past 12 months, KOSS leads with a -10.6% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOSS at 1.7% vs DXLG's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.1% | -62.0% | -3.6% | -28.9% | +8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.9% | -73.7% | -10.6% | -35.6% | -23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +1.2% | +5.3% | -85.6% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -14.2% | -75.7% | -55.2% | -78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -44.9% | +91.0% | -88.1% | -34.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.3% | +0.4% | +1.7% | -47.6% | -15.7% |
KOSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TKLF and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TKLF is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 2.25x | 1.62x | 2.30x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $2.88 | $8.59 | $1.69 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.95 | $0.33 | $3.50 | $0.43 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.6% | +18.6% | +48.7% | +37.9% | +71.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 58.6 | 55.2 | 58.2 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.3M | 23K | 144K | 299K |
Evenly matched — TKLF and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", LOVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23).
| Metric | TKLFTokyo Lifestyle C… | CANGCango Inc. | KOSSKoss Corporation | DXLGDestination XL Gr… | LOVEThe Lovesac Compa… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | — | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | — | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% | +39.2% | +8.7% |
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TKLF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KOSS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallTokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. (TKLF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TKLF vs CANG vs KOSS vs DXLG vs LOVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the stronger pick with 159. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. (TKLF) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
On trailing P/E, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -99. 3% for Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. (TKLF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOSS returned +91. 0% versus TKLF's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 201% more volatile than TKLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 166% for Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is pulling ahead at 159. 7% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tokyo Lifestyle Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 152. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKLF leads at 411. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -13. 8% for KOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TKLF or CANG or KOSS or DXLG or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tokyo Lifestyle Co.
, Ltd. (TKLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKLF: -99. 3%, DXLG: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TKLF and CANG and KOSS and DXLG and LOVE?
These companies operate in different sectors (TKLF (Consumer Defensive) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and KOSS (Technology) and DXLG (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TKLF is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; KOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TKLF: 25694.5% · CANG: 5833.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TKLF: 0.0x · CANG: 5.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.