Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UFCS
United Fire Group, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.20B
5Y Perf.+74.4%
NODK
NI Holdings, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$267M
5Y Perf.-13.8%
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.

Insurance - Diversified

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • BM
Market Cap$33.67B
5Y Perf.+234.9%
KMPR
Kemper Corporation

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.73B
5Y Perf.-53.7%

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UFCS logoUFCS
NODK logoNODK
ACGL logoACGL
KMPR logoKMPR
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - DiversifiedInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$1.20B$267M$33.67B$1.73B
Revenue (TTM)$1.43B$298M$19.93B$4.71B
Net Income (TTM)$131M$3M$4.40B$39M
Gross Margin22.8%13.3%37.2%8.1%
Operating Margin11.5%1.5%25.0%0.7%
Forward P/E12.3x10.1x7.8x
Total Debt$146M$0.00$2.73B$1.00B
Cash & Equiv.$156M$678K$993M$126M

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UFCS
NODK
ACGL
KMPR
StockMay 20May 26Return
United Fire Group, … (UFCS)100174.4+74.4%
NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK)10086.2-13.8%
Arch Capital Group … (ACGL)100334.9+234.9%
Kemper Corporation (KMPR)10046.3-53.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACGL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kemper Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. UFCS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UFCS
United Fire Group, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

UFCS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +74.0% vs KMPR's -50.2%
Best for: momentum
NODK
NI Holdings, Inc.
The Insurance Play

NODK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
  • 324.0% 10Y total return vs UFCS's 44.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
  • Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KMPR
Kemper Corporation
The Insurance Pick

KMPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 4.3%
  • Lower P/E (7.8x vs 10.1x)
  • 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UFCS's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACGL logoACGL14.3% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0%
ValueKMPR logoKMPRLower P/E (7.8x vs 10.1x)
Quality / MarginsACGL logoACGLCombined ratio 0.8 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyACGL logoACGLBeta 0.02 vs KMPR's 0.58, lower leverage
DividendsKMPR logoKMPR4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UFCS's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)UFCS logoUFCS+74.0% vs KMPR's -50.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ACGL logoACGL5.9% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 15.4% vs 3.1%

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UFCSUnited Fire Group, Inc.
FY 2023
Property And Casualty
100.0%$1.0B
NODKNI Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd.
FY 2025
Reinsurance Segment
47.6%$8.1B
Insurance Segment
45.5%$7.8B
Mortgage Segment
6.9%$1.2B
KMPRKemper Corporation
FY 2023
Specialty Property & Casualty Insurance
80.2%$3.6B
Preferred Property & Casualty Insurance
11.2%$509M
Life and Health Insurance
8.6%$388M
Other Segments
0.0%$0

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACGLLAGGINGNODK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 66.9x NODK's $298M. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, UFCS holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$298M$19.9B$4.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$173M$5M$5.2B$21M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$131M$3M$4.4B$39M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$286M-$7M$6.1B$382M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.8%+13.3%+37.2%+8.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.5%+1.5%+25.0%+0.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.2%+0.9%+22.1%+0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.1%-2.4%+30.7%+8.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.6%-14.0%+7.3%-7.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.6%+38.5%+39.0%-104.9%
ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KMPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 37% valuation discount to KMPR's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACGL's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMPR's 11.1x.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$267M$33.7B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$266M$35.4B$2.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.45x8.13x12.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.29x10.05x7.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.47x6.85x11.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.86x1.69x0.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.31x1.47x0.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.55x133.00x5.50x3.11x
KMPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for NODK. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UFCS scores 7/9 vs NODK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.4%+1.1%+19.0%+1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+0.5%+5.9%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.6%+15.4%+3.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.7%+11.6%+1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97477
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.11x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$10M-$678,000$1.7B$879M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$156M$678,000$993M$126M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$146M$0$2.7B$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense14.45x34.86x0.59x
ACGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UFCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, UFCS leads with a +74.0% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UFCS at 21.2% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+32.1%-2.6%+0.7%-24.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.0%+4.3%+2.0%-50.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.9%-2.7%+30.7%-29.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+53.8%-30.8%+144.0%-55.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.3%-12.4%+324.0%+31.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.2%-0.9%+9.3%-10.8%
UFCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UFCS and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UFCS currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.49x0.57x0.02x0.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$47.27$14.70$103.39$66.13
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.79$12.01$82.45$27.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.0%+87.9%+91.4%+44.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.447.546.351.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded98K17K1.9M813K
Evenly matched — UFCS and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KMPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: UFCS as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy", KMPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -12.4% for UFCS (target: $41). For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs UFCS's 1.32%.

MetricUFCS logoUFCSUnited Fire Group…NODK logoNODKNI Holdings, Inc.ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…KMPR logoKMPRKemper Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$104.00$48.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts63412
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+0.0%+4.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.62$0.02$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+5.6%+17.5%
KMPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ACGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMPR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallArch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UFCS vs NODK vs ACGL vs KMPR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Kemper Corporation at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Kemper Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus NODK's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 3711% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Fire Group, Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 0. 9% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACGL leads at 25. 0% versus 1. 5% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UFCS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kemper Corporation (KMPR) trades at 7.

8x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for United Fire Group, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR?

In this comparison, KMPR (4.

3% yield), UFCS (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NODK, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is UFCS or NODK or ACGL or KMPR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02), +324. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +324. 0%, NODK: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UFCS and NODK and ACGL and KMPR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UFCS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. UFCS, KMPR pay a dividend while NODK, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UFCS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NODK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KMPR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UFCS and NODK and ACGL and KMPR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UFCS: 11.6% · NODK: -14.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.