Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $1.87B | $2.11B | $5.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $472M | $586M | $1.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-50M | $-22M | $258M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 57.4% | 60.1% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -9.3% | -0.8% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.7x | 19.6x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $235M | $354M | $237M | $218M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $63M | $121M | $398M |
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upland Software, In… (UPLD) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPLD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ALKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- 32.9% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1%
NCNO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -22.1% vs UPLD's -58.5%
PCTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.43
- 218.2% 10Y total return vs ALKT's -59.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 17.7%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.14x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs UPLD's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.1% vs UPLD's -58.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 26.2% vs -8.6% |
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PCTY leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPLD leads 1 • ALKT leads 1 • NCNO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 8.6x UPLD's $202M. PCTY is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $472M | $586M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | -$12M | $27M | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$50M | -$22M | $258M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $44M | $60M | $470M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +57.4% | +60.1% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -9.3% | -0.8% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -10.6% | -3.7% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +9.4% | +10.2% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | +28.9% | +9.6% | +10.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.7% | -22.7% | +2.3% | +26.7% |
Valuation Metrics
UPLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, UPLD's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCNO's 122.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $1.9B | $2.1B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | $2.2B | $2.2B | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | -37.89x | -53.88x | 27.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.69x | 19.64x | 14.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.81x | — | 121.97x | 14.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.20x | 3.89x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 5.00x | 1.87x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.17x | 45.09x | 39.45x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY delivers a 22.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-29 for UPLD. PCTY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPLD's 2.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | -14.0% | -2.1% | +22.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | -5.9% | -1.4% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -8.6% | -1.2% | +26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | -9.3% | -1.5% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | 0.98x | 0.22x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $206M | $290M | $116M | -$180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $63M | $121M | $398M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $235M | $354M | $237M | $218M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | -3.73x | -0.51x | 23.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCTY five years ago would be worth $6,478 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for UPLD. Over the past 12 months, NCNO leads with a -22.1% total return vs UPLD's -58.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 12.2% vs UPLD's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.2% | -23.1% | -27.9% | -25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | -37.8% | -22.1% | -40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | +41.1% | -21.0% | -37.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -54.9% | -68.6% | -35.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -59.5% | -80.6% | +218.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.3% | +12.2% | -7.6% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKT and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPLD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKT currently trades 55.1% from its 52-week high vs UPLD's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.91 | $31.66 | $33.92 | $201.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $14.11 | $13.80 | $92.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +55.1% | +52.4% | +54.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.5 | 50.9 | 50.1 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 1.9M | 2.7M | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALKT as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 26.2% for ALKT (target: $22).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $32.33 | $168.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 23 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
PCTY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UPLD vs ALKT vs NCNO vs PCTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
On forward P/E, Paylocity Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 14.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
Over the past 5 years, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) delivered a total return of -35.
2%, compared to -97. 8% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCTY returned +218. 2% versus UPLD's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Upland Software, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning UPLD is approximately 338% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for Upland Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Upland Software, Inc. grew EPS 63. 4% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
2% net margin versus -17. 9% for Upland Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCTY leads at 19. 1% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCTY leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) trades at 14.
0x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UPLD or ALKT or NCNO or PCTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), +218. 2% 10Y return). Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCTY: +218. 2%, UPLD: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPLD and ALKT and NCNO and PCTY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UPLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.