Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.-53.4%
LC
LendingClub Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.+53.8%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.-36.4%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-32.4%
OPRT
Oportun Financial Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$263M
5Y Perf.-64.1%

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UPST logoUPST
LC logoLC
SOFI logoSOFI
AFRM logoAFRM
OPRT logoOPRT
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$2.78B$1.92B$20.40B$22.44B$263M
Revenue (TTM)$1.08B$1.33B$4.77B$3.20B$637M
Net Income (TTM)$49M$136M$481M$382M$18M
Gross Margin95.2%64.7%75.1%62.6%63.7%
Operating Margin5.1%25.0%11.0%10.2%6.9%
Forward P/E14.7x9.6x26.5x62.5x3.7x
Total Debt$1.85B$16M$1.82B$7.85B$2.81B
Cash & Equiv.$657M$918M$4.93B$1.35B$106M

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UPST
LC
SOFI
AFRM
OPRT
StockJan 21May 26Return
Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST)10046.6-53.4%
LendingClub Corpora… (LC)100153.8+53.8%
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)10063.6-36.4%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10067.6-32.4%
Oportun Financial C… (OPRT)10035.9-64.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AFRM and OPRT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Oportun Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. UPST and LC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UPST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
  • 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
Best for: growth exposure
LC
LendingClub Corporation
The Banking Pick

LC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
  • Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
  • +62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 52.7% 10Y total return vs LC's -27.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

AFRM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 11.9% margin vs OPRT's 4.0%
  • 3.1% ROA vs OPRT's 0.6%, ROIC -0.7% vs 1.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
OPRT
Oportun Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

OPRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.

  • NIM 20.3% vs SOFI's 4.4%
  • Lower P/E (3.7x vs 62.5x)
  • Beta 2.07 vs UPST's 2.96
Best for: bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUPST logoUPST58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
ValueOPRT logoOPRTLower P/E (3.7x vs 62.5x)
Quality / MarginsAFRM logoAFRM11.9% margin vs OPRT's 4.0%
Stability / SafetyOPRT logoOPRTBeta 2.07 vs UPST's 2.96
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LC logoLC+62.4% vs UPST's -37.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AFRM logoAFRM3.1% ROA vs OPRT's 0.6%, ROIC -0.7% vs 1.0%

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UPSTUpstart Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing Fees, Net
51.7%$157M
Servicing Fees
33.0%$100M
Borrower Fees
9.7%$29M
Collection Agency Fees
4.8%$14M
Other Fees
0.9%$3M
LCLendingClub Corporation
FY 2025
Financial Service
86.3%$373M
Servicing Fees
13.7%$59M
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
OPRTOportun Financial Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLCLAGGINGSOFI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 7.5x OPRT's $637M. AFRM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPRT's 4.0%.

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$1.3B$4.8B$3.2B$637M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$68M$287M$760M$533M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$49M$136M$481M$382M$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$146M-$2.9B-$2.6B$787M$409M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+95.2%+64.7%+75.1%+62.6%+63.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.1%+25.0%+11.0%+10.2%+6.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%+10.2%+10.1%+11.9%+4.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-15.4%-2.1%-83.5%+24.6%+61.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-65.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-169.2%+3.2%-56.7%-76.2%
LC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, OPRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$1.9B$20.4B$22.4B$263M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.0B$1.0B$17.3B$28.9B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS64.44x14.51x41.03x449.07x10.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.69x9.56x26.45x62.49x3.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple50.13x2.57x22.75x209.99x34.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.58x1.44x4.28x6.96x0.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.90x1.32x1.91x7.48x0.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.29x0.68x
OPRT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AFRM delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for OPRT. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPRT's 7.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRT scores 8/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.6%+9.5%+5.9%+11.2%+4.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+1.2%+1.1%+3.1%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.7%+17.3%+3.6%-0.7%+1.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.4%+3.3%+1.2%-0.9%+1.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956368
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.32x0.01x0.17x2.56x7.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.2B-$902M-$3.1B$6.5B$2.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$657M$918M$4.9B$1.4B$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.9B$16M$1.8B$7.9B$2.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.66x0.67x0.45x1.88x0.14x
LC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AFRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,638 for OPRT. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 78.0% vs OPRT's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-36.7%-12.7%-41.7%-9.0%+13.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.6%+62.4%+23.0%+30.7%+3.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+116.7%+142.9%+192.5%+464.2%+33.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.8%+15.1%-3.1%+24.7%-73.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.6%-27.7%+52.7%-30.7%-64.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.4%+34.4%+43.0%+78.0%+10.0%
AFRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LC and OPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OPRT is the less volatile stock with a 2.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LC currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.96x2.36x2.54x2.72x2.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$87.30$21.67$32.73$100.00$7.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.96$9.70$12.56$42.09$4.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+33.2%+77.0%+48.9%+67.4%+72.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.757.441.963.158.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.8M2.1M65.8M5.3M510K
Evenly matched — LC and OPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: UPST as "Buy", LC as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", AFRM as "Buy", OPRT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 89.2% upside for OPRT (target: $11) vs 19.9% for AFRM (target: $81).

MetricUPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…LC logoLCLendingClub Corpo…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …OPRT logoOPRTOportun Financial…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$45.17$22.75$20.89$80.77$10.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts222927338
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+1.1%0.0%
LC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLendingClub Corporation (LC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UPST vs LC vs SOFI vs AFRM vs OPRT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

On trailing P/E, Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) is the cheapest at 10.

8x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, Oportun Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.

(AFRM) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -73. 6% for Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus OPRT's -64. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

07β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 43% more volatile than OPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Oportun Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.

(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

2% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) trades at 3.

7x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 58. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRT: 89. 2% to $10. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is UPST or LC or SOFI or AFRM or OPRT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.

(SOFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOFI: +52. 7%, OPRT: -64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UPST and LC and SOFI and AFRM and OPRT?

These companies operate in different sectors (UPST (Financial Services) and LC (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology) and OPRT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LC

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OPRT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UPST and LC and SOFI and AFRM and OPRT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UPST: 58.9% · LC: 15.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(UPST: 5.0% · LC: 10.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(UPST: 64.4x · LC: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.