Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Steel
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Steel | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $70.66B | $416.75B | $94.29B | $51.64B | $22.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.53B | $70.75B | $33.89B | $34.16B | $4.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.79B | $9.42B | $2.67B | $2.33B | $426M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 32.5% | 25.4% | 14.0% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 16.6% | 11.2% | 10.0% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 38.8x | 25.9x | 16.2x | 37.9x |
| Total Debt | $19.39B | $43.33B | $8.11B | $7.12B | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.40B | $9.98B | $2.85B | $2.26B | $417M |
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vale S.A. (VALE) | 100 | 165.9 | +65.9% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 536.4 | +436.4% |
| ATI Inc. (ATI) | 100 | 1873.2 | +1773.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VALE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 37.9x)
- 5.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1%
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs ATI's 10.5%
- 13.3% margin vs NUE's 6.8%
- +181.5% vs VALE's +86.6%
- 10.0% ROA vs VALE's 3.1%, ROIC 15.9% vs 17.7%
CMI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NUE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 32.2%, current ratio 2.94x
- PEG 0.62 vs CMI's 2.30
- Beta 1.03, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.94x
ATI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs CMI's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 37.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs NUE's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs CMI's 1.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, vs CMI's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs VALE's +86.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs VALE's 3.1%, ROIC 15.9% vs 17.7% |
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 1 of 6 categories
VALE leads 1 • NUE leads 1 • CMI leads 0 • ATI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 15.4x ATI's $4.6B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUE's 6.8%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.5B | $70.8B | $33.9B | $34.2B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.2B | $14.0B | $4.6B | $4.9B | $837M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $9.4B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $426M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.4B | $11.4B | $2.7B | $532M | $552M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +32.5% | +25.4% | +14.0% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +16.6% | +11.2% | +10.0% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +13.3% | +7.9% | +6.8% | +9.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +16.2% | +7.9% | +1.6% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +22.2% | +2.7% | +21.3% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +30.2% | -21.0% | +3.8% | +26.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VALE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, VALE trades at a 51% valuation discount to ATI's 57.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NUE offers better value at 1.16x vs CMI's 2.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.7B | $416.8B | $94.3B | $51.6B | $22.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82.6B | $450.1B | $99.6B | $56.5B | $23.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.91x | 47.57x | 33.29x | 30.15x | 57.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.09x | 38.79x | 25.92x | 16.15x | 37.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 2.95x | 1.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.85x | 33.41x | 20.03x | 13.65x | 29.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 6.17x | 2.80x | 1.59x | 4.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.01x | 19.71x | 7.06x | 2.37x | 12.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.09x | 40.56x | 39.52x | — | 66.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CAT and ATI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $7 for VALE. NUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATI scores 8/9 vs VALE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +47.5% | +20.3% | +10.6% | +22.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +10.0% | +7.8% | +6.7% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +15.9% | +16.1% | +7.7% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +19.1% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 2.03x | 0.61x | 0.32x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.0B | $33.4B | $5.3B | $4.9B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.4B | $10.0B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $417M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.4B | $43.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.92x | 9.22x | 12.15x | 29.72x | 6.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CAT and ATI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATI five years ago would be worth $67,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,543 for VALE. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs VALE's +86.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATI at 62.7% vs VALE's 11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.1% | +50.2% | +31.1% | +34.2% | +36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.6% | +181.5% | +131.7% | +98.8% | +133.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | +324.9% | +214.6% | +64.7% | +330.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.4% | +282.5% | +168.7% | +140.0% | +572.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +500.1% | +1227.6% | +557.4% | +426.7% | +1050.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.9% | +62.0% | +46.5% | +18.1% | +62.7% |
Risk & Volatility
NUE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUE is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMI's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs VALE's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.54x | 1.57x | 1.03x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.94 | $931.35 | $718.08 | $235.44 | $171.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.97 | $318.11 | $296.59 | $106.21 | $68.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +96.2% | +95.0% | +96.3% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 76.2 | 75.7 | 85.9 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.6M | 2.4M | 794K | 1.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VALE and CMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VALE as "Hold", CAT as "Buy", CMI as "Buy", NUE as "Buy", ATI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.6% upside for ATI (target: $173) vs -9.0% for CMI (target: $621). For income investors, VALE offers the higher dividend yield at 5.17% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.65 | $824.80 | $621.10 | $222.83 | $173.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 53 | 51 | 32 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 21 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $5.86 | $7.61 | $2.22 | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +2.1% |
CAT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). VALE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
VALE vs CAT vs CMI vs NUE vs ATI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). Vale S. A. (VALE) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
On trailing P/E, Vale S.
A. (VALE) is the cheapest at 27. 9x versus ATI Inc. at 57. 0x. On forward P/E, Vale S. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nucor Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.
(ATI) delivered a total return of +572. 7%, compared to +5. 4% for Vale S. A. (VALE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus NUE's +426. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
03β versus Cummins Inc. 's 1. 57β — meaning CMI is approximately 52% more volatile than NUE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nucor Corporation (NUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ATI Inc. grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -57. 7% for Vale S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMI leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 5. 4% for Nucor Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VALE leads at 29. 0% versus 8. 2% for NUE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VALE leads at 34. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Vale S. A. (VALE) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 30. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATI: 6. 6% to $173. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI?
In this comparison, VALE (5.
2% yield), CMI (1. 1% yield), NUE (1. 0% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VALE or CAT or CMI or NUE or ATI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +1228% 10Y return). ATI Inc. (ATI) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1228%, ATI: +1050%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VALE and CAT and CMI and NUE and ATI?
These companies operate in different sectors (VALE (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and CMI (Industrials) and NUE (Basic Materials) and ATI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VALE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ATI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VALE, CAT, CMI, NUE pay a dividend while ATI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.