REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $30.22B | $13.52B | $4.26B | $59.37B | $8.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.05B | $1.56B | $718M | $5.75B | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.10B | $892M | $275M | $1.06B | $387M |
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | 39.1% | 99.7% | 89.8% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 98.7% | 82.0% | 57.7% | 28.3% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 14.9x | 18.6x | 38.2x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7.79B | $0.00 | $0.00 | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $224M | $91M | $435M | $5M |
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) | 100 | 144.1 | +44.1% |
| Gaming and Leisure … (GLPI) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| EPR Properties (EPR) | 100 | 177.4 | +77.4% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.5 | +41.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VICI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.19 vs GLPI's 2.96
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.19 vs 1.94
- 76.7% margin vs O's 18.4%
GLPI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 6.5%
- 126.7% 10Y total return vs O's 51.8%
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.5%, current ratio 9.56x
- 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
EPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 105.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 12.1% FFO/revenue growth vs VICI's 4.1%
- +19.2% vs VICI's -5.8%
O is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.09 vs EPR's 0.35
NNN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 0.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% FFO/revenue growth vs VICI's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 21.6x), PEG 1.19 vs 1.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 76.7% margin vs O's 18.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs EPR's 0.35 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NNN's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.2% vs VICI's -5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 7.3% vs 2.3% |
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories
EPR leads 1 • GLPI leads 0 • O leads 0 • NNN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VICI and EPR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 8.0x EPR's $718M. VICI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 18.4%. On growth, EPR holds the edge at +33.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $1.6B | $718M | $5.7B | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.0B | $1.5B | $583M | $4.1B | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.1B | $892M | $275M | $1.1B | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $585M | $323M | $2.8B | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.2% | +39.1% | +99.7% | +89.8% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +98.7% | +82.0% | +57.7% | +28.3% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +57.3% | +38.3% | +18.4% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +37.6% | +45.0% | +48.5% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | -9.8% | +33.5% | +11.0% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.8% | +38.3% | +5.2% | +39.1% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VICI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, VICI trades at a 80% valuation discount to O's 54.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICI offers better value at 1.30x vs O's 73.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.2B | $13.5B | $4.3B | $59.4B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.7B | $21.1B | $4.2B | $58.9B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.83x | 16.24x | 17.07x | 54.33x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.89x | 14.91x | 18.60x | 38.20x | 21.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.30x | 3.23x | — | 73.34x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.12x | 14.21x | 7.15x | 14.38x | 15.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.54x | 8.48x | 5.93x | 10.33x | 9.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 2.67x | 1.84x | 1.43x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.05x | 16.39x | 10.13x | 14.86x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — VICI and GLPI and EPR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLPI delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for O. NNN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLPI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPR scores 6/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +17.9% | +11.8% | +2.6% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +1.5% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +7.3% | +8.2% | +2.3% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +9.3% | +7.3% | +2.3% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.56x | — | — | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$563M | $7.6B | -$91M | -$435M | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $224M | $91M | $435M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7.8B | $0 | $0 | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.45x | 3.28x | 3.11x | — | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPR five years ago would be worth $15,203 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,644 for VICI. Over the past 12 months, EPR leads with a +19.2% total return vs VICI's -5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPR at 16.2% vs VICI's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +9.3% | +12.7% | +12.8% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.8% | +9.8% | +19.2% | +17.3% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | +11.4% | +56.8% | +16.1% | +15.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.4% | +36.1% | +52.0% | +21.3% | +18.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | +126.7% | +29.4% | +51.8% | +40.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.6% | +3.7% | +16.2% | +5.1% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — O and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
O is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EPR's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs VICI's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.19x | 0.35x | 0.09x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.01 | $49.95 | $62.08 | $67.94 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.55 | $41.17 | $48.11 | $54.38 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +95.6% | +90.2% | +93.6% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 52.7 | 51.5 | 50.0 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.7M | 2.1M | 818K | 5.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLPI and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VICI as "Buy", GLPI as "Buy", EPR as "Hold", O as "Hold", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for VICI (target: $32) vs 2.6% for O (target: $65). For income investors, GLPI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.52% vs EPR's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $51.17 | $59.13 | $65.25 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 27 | 21 | 34 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +6.5% | +0.2% | — | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.74 | $3.11 | $0.10 | — | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VICI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EPR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
VICI vs GLPI vs EPR vs O vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EPR Properties (EPR) is the stronger pick with 12.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
On trailing P/E, VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Realty Income Corporation at 54. 3x. On forward P/E, VICI Properties Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: VICI Properties Inc. wins at 1. 19x versus Realty Income Corporation's 73. 34x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, EPR Properties (EPR) delivered a total return of +52.
0%, compared to +16. 4% for VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLPI returned +126. 7% versus EPR's +29. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Realty Income Corporation (O) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus EPR Properties's 0. 35β — meaning EPR is approximately 284% more volatile than O relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 109% versus 156% for Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EPR Properties (EPR) is pulling ahead at 12.
1% versus 4. 1% for VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EPR Properties grew EPS 105. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
VICI Properties Inc.
(VICI) is the more profitable company, earning 69. 3% net margin versus 18. 4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 69. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICI leads at 91. 1% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EPR leads at 99. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 19x versus Realty Income Corporation's 73. 34x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 38. 2x for Realty Income Corporation — 28. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VICI: 13. 2% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN?
In this comparison, GLPI (6.
5% yield), VICI (6. 2% yield), NNN (5. 3% yield), EPR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. O does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VICI or GLPI or EPR or O or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
(GLPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 6. 5% yield, +126. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLPI: +126. 7%, EPR: +29. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VICI and GLPI and EPR and O and NNN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VICI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GLPI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; O is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VICI, GLPI, NNN pay a dividend while EPR, O do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.