Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Security & Protection Services
Software - Application
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Software - Infrastructure | Security & Protection Services | Software - Application | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $102M | $1.42B | $1.62B | $219M | $69M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $318M | $561M | $150M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $126M | $29M | $31M | $-25M | $-132K |
| Gross Margin | 25.8% | 47.7% | 45.1% | 34.4% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | -6.7% | 2.7% | -1.0% | -3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.6x | 19.2x | 18.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $159M | $5M | $7M | $7M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.03B | $653M | $146M | $105M | $2M |
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viomi Technology Co… (VIOT) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| Tuya Inc. (TUYA) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 237.3 | +137.3% |
| SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 2.07x
- Better valuation composite
TUYA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
- 9.1% margin vs SMRT's -16.6%
- 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ARLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- -32.6% 10Y total return vs VIOT's -86.5%
- +43.3% vs SNBR's -56.8%
- 9.1% ROA vs SMRT's -7.6%, ROIC 35.9% vs -19.6%
SMRT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SNBR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs SMRT's -16.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs SMRT's -7.6%, ROIC 35.9% vs -19.6% |
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARLO leads 2 • TUYA leads 1 • SMRT leads 0 • SNBR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 1783.8x SNBR's $1M. TUYA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMRT's -16.6%. On growth, VIOT holds the edge at +42.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $318M | $561M | $150M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $152M | -$21M | $18M | $5M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | $29M | $31M | -$25M | -$132,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $64M | -$16M | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +47.7% | +45.1% | +34.4% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -6.7% | +2.7% | -1.0% | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +9.1% | +5.5% | -16.6% | -9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +25.5% | +11.5% | -10.9% | -14.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +9.3% | +26.3% | -6.4% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | — | — | +90.5% | -11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
VIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, VIOT trades at a 99% valuation discount to TUYA's 282.4x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $219M | $69M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$25M | $770M | $1.5B | $122M | $422M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.17x | 282.35x | 106.43x | -3.56x | -0.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.57x | 19.20x | 18.51x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.78x | — | 148.35x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 4.75x | 3.07x | 1.44x | 49.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 1.41x | 12.84x | 0.93x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.01x | 18.61x | 24.27x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO delivers a 22.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SMRT. TUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIOT's 0.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIOT scores 7/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +2.9% | +22.9% | -10.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +2.6% | +9.1% | -7.6% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.8% | -8.5% | +35.9% | -19.6% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | -4.8% | +4.7% | -12.4% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.00x | 0.05x | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$867M | -$649M | -$140M | -$97M | $353M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $653M | $146M | $105M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159M | $5M | $7M | $7M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -78.29x | -780.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for SNBR. Over the past 12 months, ARLO leads with a +43.3% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 29.3% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.2% | +12.4% | +12.6% | -40.9% | -64.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.9% | +9.8% | +43.3% | +21.9% | -56.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | +23.2% | +116.3% | -57.5% | -87.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | -84.9% | +123.1% | -89.5% | -97.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.5% | -89.5% | -32.6% | -86.8% | -87.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +7.2% | +29.3% | -24.8% | -49.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIOT and TUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TUYA currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.80x | 1.48x | 1.78x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.33 | $2.95 | $19.94 | $2.20 | $13.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.92 | $1.99 | $10.20 | $0.72 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.9% | +81.4% | +74.7% | +51.8% | +21.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 52.4 | 54.0 | 29.9 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 267K | 1.5M | 1.3M | 905K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
TUYA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VIOT as "Buy", TUYA as "Buy", ARLO as "Buy", SMRT as "Hold", SNBR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SMRT (target: $4) vs 17.4% for ARLO (target: $18). TUYA is the only dividend payer here at 2.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.69 | $17.50 | $4.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.0% | +2.8% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
VIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARLO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VIOT vs TUYA vs ARLO vs SMRT vs SNBR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (3. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
On trailing P/E, Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Tuya Inc. at 282. 4x. On forward P/E, Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd is actually cheaper at 3. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +123. 1%, compared to -97. 3% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARLO returned -32. 6% versus TUYA's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 185% more volatile than VIOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tuya Inc. (TUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 11% for Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd grew EPS 273. 2% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLO leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 0% net margin versus -39. 8% for SmartRent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIOT leads at 7. 4% versus -24. 7% for SMRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) trades at 3. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for Tuya Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMRT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR?
In this comparison, TUYA (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. VIOT, ARLO, SMRT, SNBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VIOT or TUYA or ARLO or SMRT or SNBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIOT: -86. 5%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VIOT and TUYA and ARLO and SMRT and SNBR?
These companies operate in different sectors (VIOT (Consumer Cyclical) and TUYA (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials) and SMRT (Technology) and SNBR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VIOT is a small-cap deep-value stock; TUYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TUYA pays a dividend while VIOT, ARLO, SMRT, SNBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.