Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Consumer Electronics
Software - Infrastructure
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Consumer Electronics | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $80M | $374.00B | $1.56T | $4.22T | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $439M | $45.18B | $214.96B | $451.44B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $170M | $10.98B | $70.59B | $122.58B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 48.5% | 81.9% | 47.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -10.1% | 29.5% | 41.2% | 32.6% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 24.8x | 20.4x | 33.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $14.46B | $83.90B | $112.38B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.07B | $9.03B | $35.87B | $35.93B | $30.24B |
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiMi Hologram Cloud… (WIMI) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WIMI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 25.3x)
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- PEG 0.75 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Beta 0.39 vs WIMI's 2.80
META is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 22.2% revenue growth vs WIMI's -7.4%
AAPL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- +47.0% vs WIMI's -58.6%
- 34.0% ROA vs WIMI's 6.1%, ROIC 67.4% vs -4.7%
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs NFLX's 24.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs WIMI's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs NFLX's 24.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs WIMI's 2.80 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs META's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.0% vs WIMI's -58.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs WIMI's 6.1%, ROIC 67.4% vs -4.7% |
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
WIMI leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • NFLX leads 0 • META leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WIMI and META and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 1027.5x WIMI's $439M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFLX's 24.3%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $439M | $45.2B | $215.0B | $451.4B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $30.1B | $109.3B | $160.0B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $170M | $11.0B | $70.6B | $122.6B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $596M | $9.5B | $48.3B | $129.2B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +48.5% | +81.9% | +47.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | +29.5% | +41.2% | +32.6% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +24.3% | +32.8% | +27.2% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +135.7% | +20.9% | +22.4% | +28.6% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.3% | +17.6% | +33.1% | +16.6% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.2% | +31.1% | +62.4% | +21.8% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WIMI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, WIMI trades at a 80% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $374.0B | $1.56T | $4.22T | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $379.4B | $1.61T | $4.30T | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.55x | 34.89x | 26.26x | 38.53x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 20.36x | 33.78x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | 1.43x | 2.16x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 15.81x | 29.68x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 8.28x | 7.78x | 10.14x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 14.32x | 7.31x | 58.49x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.02x | 39.53x | 33.90x | 42.72x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $9 for WIMI. WIMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +41.3% | +33.2% | +146.7% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +19.8% | +20.8% | +34.0% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +29.8% | +27.6% | +67.4% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +30.5% | +29.4% | +69.6% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.52x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$922M | $5.4B | $48.0B | $76.4B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B | $35.9B | $35.9B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $14.5B | $83.9B | $112.4B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.06x | 17.33x | 78.84x | — | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for WIMI. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +47.0% total return vs WIMI's -58.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs WIMI's -57.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.7% | -3.0% | -5.1% | +6.2% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.6% | -23.6% | +3.7% | +47.0% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.2% | +166.5% | +166.4% | +67.4% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +75.2% | +94.8% | +124.4% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +875.3% | +421.2% | +1174.1% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.3% | +38.6% | +38.6% | +18.7% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WIMI's 2.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs WIMI's 28.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.80x | 0.39x | 1.59x | 0.99x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.65 | $134.12 | $796.25 | $292.13 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $75.01 | $520.26 | $193.25 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.7% | +65.8% | +77.5% | +98.4% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 35.3 | 42.8 | 69.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 561K | 44.0M | 15.6M | 39.8M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", META as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.2% upside for META (target: $822) vs 10.3% for AAPL (target: $317). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs META's 0.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $821.80 | $317.11 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 60 | 110 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +0.4% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 14 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.07 | $1.03 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.7% | +2.1% | +0.6% |
AAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). WIMI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WIMI vs NFLX vs META vs AAPL vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI). WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc.
(WIMI) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -98. 5% for WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus WIMI's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. 's 2. 80β — meaning WIMI is approximately 619% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -7. 4% for WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. grew EPS 130. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 13. 2% for WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -5. 4% for WIMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 33. 2% to $821. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), META (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WIMI, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WIMI or NFLX or META or AAPL or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc. (WIMI) carries a higher beta of 2. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, WIMI: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WIMI and NFLX and META and AAPL and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (WIMI (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WIMI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while WIMI, NFLX, META, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.