Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Software - Infrastructure
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $322M | $485M | $525M | $1.99B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $335M | $927M | $951M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-183M | $107M | $314M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 63.8% | 66.5% | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | 42.6% | 47.9% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 2742.6x | 4.3x | 7.5x | 8.9x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B | $152M | $68M | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.35B | $199M | $1.21B | $306M |
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Lane Acquisi… (WLAC) | 100 | 190.4 | +90.4% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 78.2 | -21.8% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 130.6 | +30.6% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +85.4% vs PSFE's -37.1%
PSFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.1x)
ACIC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACIC's -22.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
Among these 5 stocks, EVTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs PSFE's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.9% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs PSFE's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EVTC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.4% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs 3.6% |
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 4 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • WLAC leads 0 • ACIC leads 0 • EVTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and WLAC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $335M | $927M | $951M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$618,741 | $371M | $154M | $454M | $316M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$183M | $107M | $314M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$940,670 | $136M | $71M | $431M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +63.8% | +66.5% | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | +42.6% | +47.9% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | +31.9% | +33.9% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | +21.1% | +46.4% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +9.3% | +11.9% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -183.3% | +4.3% | +23.4% | -24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 100% valuation discount to WLAC's 2742.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs EVTC's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $485M | $525M | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $1.8B | $478M | $844M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2742.65x | -2.99x | 5.05x | 6.15x | 10.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.25x | 7.49x | 8.94x | 6.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.13x | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x | 2.93x | 1.92x | 7.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 1.56x | 2.20x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 0.83x | 1.70x | 1.77x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x | 7.40x | 4.47x | 10.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs WLAC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | -24.1% | +35.7% | +32.0% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -3.8% | +9.0% | +13.2% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% | +41.0% | +6.8% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +3.6% | +26.0% | +40.6% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x | 0.48x | 0.06x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $1.3B | -$46M | -$1.1B | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.3B | $199M | $1.2B | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B | $152M | $68M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x | 14.20x | 67.24x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, WLAC leads with a +85.4% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.9% | +17.7% | +1.9% | -16.7% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +85.4% | -37.1% | -0.3% | +2.4% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -34.9% | +159.1% | +209.6% | -31.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -94.2% | +107.0% | +105.3% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -92.1% | -22.2% | +436.8% | +89.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.5% | -13.3% | +37.3% | +45.7% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WLAC and ACIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WLAC currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 2.33x | 0.24x | 0.38x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.96 | $16.49 | $13.06 | $210.50 | $38.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.06 | $5.95 | $9.79 | $136.37 | $22.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +56.9% | +83.1% | +72.6% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.5 | 65.3 | 31.0 | 48.7 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 361K | 188K | 167K | 431K |
Analyst Outlook
HCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WLAC as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for EVTC (target: $34) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, HCI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.98% vs EVTC's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $1.90 | $126.50 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.50 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.8% |
HCI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WLAC vs PSFE vs ACIC vs HCI vs EVTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willow Lane Acquisition Corp. (WLAC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.
0x versus Willow Lane Acquisition Corp. at 2742. 6x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +434. 8% versus PSFE's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 33β — meaning PSFE is approximately 883% more volatile than ACIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 0. 0% for WLAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 8. 9x for HCI Group, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 45. 5% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC?
In this comparison, HCI (1.
0% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. WLAC, PSFE, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WLAC or PSFE or ACIC or HCI or EVTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 0% yield, +434. 8% 10Y return). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCI: +434. 8%, PSFE: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WLAC and PSFE and ACIC and HCI and EVTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (WLAC (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and HCI (Financial Services) and EVTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WLAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock. HCI, EVTC pay a dividend while WLAC, PSFE, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.