Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $790K | $760M | $340.44B | $48.92B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $5.85B | $1.01T | $130.46B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-374M | $123.35B | $9.00B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 10.6% | 67.5% | 41.2% | 44.7% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -285.5% | -9.1% | 10.9% | -2.6% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 4.1x | 2.6x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $41K | $492M | $248.49B | $79.32B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $1.32B | $181.73B | $24.83B | $30.71B |
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meiwu Technology Co… (WNW) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 60.6 | -39.4% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 454.2 | +354.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 15.81x
- 43.7% revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1%
GOTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.99 vs BIDU's 1.41, lower leverage
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Beta 1.21, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.99
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 83.4%
- 37.9% margin vs WNW's -186.1%
- +163.5% vs WNW's -98.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs WNW's -186.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs BIDU's 1.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs WNW's -98.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs WNW's -28.1%, ROIC 25.1% vs -57.7% |
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
WNW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 139794.0x WNW's $7M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WNW's -186.1%. On growth, WNW holds the edge at +62.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $5.8B | $1.01T | $130.5B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$378M | $114.6B | $4.9B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$374M | $123.4B | $9.0B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $0 | $2.6B | -$15.7B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +67.5% | +41.2% | +44.7% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -9.1% | +10.9% | -2.6% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -186.1% | -6.4% | +12.2% | +6.9% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.4% | +1.7% | +0.3% | -12.0% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.6% | +32.9% | +4.8% | -7.1% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.2% | +66.7% | -52.0% | -2.6% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WNW and BIDU each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, BIDU trades at a 61% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $790,078 | $760M | $340.4B | $48.9B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$17M | $638M | $350.3B | $56.9B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -4.86x | 17.90x | 14.44x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.13x | 2.58x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 13.55x | 10.79x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.12x | 2.33x | 2.50x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 2.67x | 2.12x | 1.17x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.09x | 64.81x | 29.64x | 25.41x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-31 for WNW. WNW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIDU's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.7% | -21.8% | +11.2% | +3.1% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.1% | -6.8% | +6.7% | +2.0% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -47.8% | +9.6% | +4.8% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | -39.9% | +10.4% | +6.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.25x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$829M | $66.8B | $54.5B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $1.3B | $181.7B | $24.8B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41,235 | $492M | $248.5B | $79.3B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 15.74x | 9.71x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WNW. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs WNW's -98.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs WNW's -93.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | -19.3% | -9.5% | -6.9% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.2% | -39.4% | +16.0% | +61.3% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -32.3% | +74.8% | +14.2% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -92.4% | -35.4% | -27.0% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -81.2% | +83.4% | -17.5% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.4% | -12.2% | +20.5% | +4.5% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIDU's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs WNW's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.99x | 1.21x | 1.41x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1352.00 | $4.56 | $192.67 | $165.30 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $1.84 | $103.71 | $81.17 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +43.2% | +73.2% | +84.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.3 | 52.7 | 61.8 | 69.1 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 898K | 395K | 10.4M | 2.0M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BABA and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", BABA as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, BABA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.27% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | $194.23 | $154.70 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 59 | 53 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +3.8% | +1.9% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
WNW vs GOTU vs BABA vs BIDU vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is the stronger pick with 43.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus WNW's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Baidu, Inc. 's 1. 41β — meaning BIDU is approximately 43% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 28% for Baidu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meiwu Technology Company Limited (WNW) is pulling ahead at 43.
7% versus -1. 1% for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -262. 5% for Meiwu Technology Company Limited — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -263. 0% for WNW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 49. 2% to $2. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. WNW, GOTU, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WNW or GOTU or BABA or BIDU or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, BIDU: -17. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WNW and GOTU and BABA and BIDU and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNW (Consumer Cyclical) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and BIDU (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WNW is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. BABA pays a dividend while WNW, GOTU, BIDU, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.