WRLD vs FISV vs FIS vs RM

For growth investors, Regional Management Corp.

(RM) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). Regional Management Corp. (RM) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Regional Management Corp.

(RM) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Regional Management Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) delivered a total return of +11.

3%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRLD returned +266. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Regional Management Corp. 's 1. 40β — meaning RM is approximately 84% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 5% for Regional Management Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Regional Management Corp.

(RM) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: World Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FISV leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 12. 4% for RM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WRLD leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regional Management Corp. (RM) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 14. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), RM (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WRLD, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, WRLD: +266. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WRLD (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology) and FIS (Technology) and RM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; RM is a small-cap deep-value stock. FIS, RM pay a dividend while WRLD, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.