REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $975M | $65.73B | $57.74B | $15.84B | $14.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $165M | $6.36B | $5.92B | $2.16B | $1.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $4.61B | $1.12B | $616M | $630M |
| Gross Margin | 56.8% | 85.7% | 68.6% | 54.7% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | 49.9% | 29.3% | 36.1% | 54.0% |
| Forward P/E | 49.2x | 30.4x | 37.6x | 30.0x | 31.9x |
| Total Debt | $644M | $29.94B | $32.85B | $8.64B | $5.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $823M | $435M | $213M | $121M |
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitestone REIT (WSR) | 100 | 308.6 | +208.6% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 350.3 | +250.3% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.6 | +15.6% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
| Regency Centers Cor… (REG) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 88.5% 10Y total return vs SPG's 29.3%
- +53.5% vs REG's +12.0%
SPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 72.5% margin vs O's 18.9%
- 11.4% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.8%
O carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.11, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
- 9.1% FFO/revenue growth vs REG's 3.4%
KIM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (30.0x vs 30.4x)
REG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.52 vs WSR's 1.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% FFO/revenue growth vs REG's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.0x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs O's 18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs SPG's 0.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs REG's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs REG's +12.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs O's 1.5%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.8% |
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSR leads 1 • O leads 1 • KIM leads 0 • REG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 38.5x WSR's $165M. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 18.9%. On growth, REG holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $165M | $6.4B | $5.9B | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $4.7B | $4.2B | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $4.6B | $1.1B | $616M | $630M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | $2.3B | $4.1B | $844M | $700M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.8% | +85.7% | +68.6% | +54.7% | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +49.9% | +29.3% | +36.1% | +54.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +72.5% | +18.9% | +28.5% | +37.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +35.4% | +68.5% | +39.0% | +41.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +13.2% | +12.2% | +4.0% | +31.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +3.6% | +17.9% | +27.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WSR and O and KIM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 73% valuation discount to O's 52.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSR offers better value at 0.43x vs O's 72.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $65.7B | $57.7B | $15.8B | $14.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $94.9B | $90.2B | $24.3B | $20.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.98x | 14.29x | 52.92x | 28.30x | 27.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.17x | 30.39x | 37.60x | 30.04x | 31.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 0.45x | 72.19x | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.04x | 20.36x | 21.99x | 17.68x | 20.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.06x | 10.33x | 10.04x | 7.40x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 9.83x | 1.40x | 1.50x | 1.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.21x | — | 14.45x | 20.51x | 36.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $3 for O. KIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSR scores 7/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +68.8% | +2.8% | +5.8% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +11.4% | +1.5% | +3.1% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.6% | +1.8% | +3.0% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +9.1% | +2.4% | +3.9% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 4.47x | 0.82x | 0.82x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $639M | $29.1B | $32.4B | $8.4B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $823M | $435M | $213M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $644M | $29.9B | $32.9B | $8.6B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | 3.26x | — | 2.46x | 2.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSR five years ago would be worth $23,259 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,812 for O. Over the past 12 months, WSR leads with a +53.5% total return vs REG's +12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSR at 33.6% vs O's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.5% | +11.1% | +9.9% | +18.4% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.5% | +29.3% | +15.8% | +18.5% | +12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.7% | +109.8% | +13.8% | +43.4% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +89.2% | +18.1% | +31.1% | +38.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.5% | +29.3% | +45.3% | +11.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.6% | +28.0% | +4.4% | +12.8% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSR and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
O is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPG's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSR currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs O's 91.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.61x | 0.11x | 0.54x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.01 | $208.28 | $67.94 | $24.31 | $81.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.43 | $155.44 | $54.38 | $19.76 | $66.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +97.0% | +91.1% | +96.6% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 52.9 | 40.3 | 52.3 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 476K | 1.4M | 5.6M | 4.9M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
O leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSR as "Hold", SPG as "Hold", O as "Hold", KIM as "Hold", REG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.6% upside for O (target: $66) vs -3.8% for WSR (target: $18). For income investors, O offers the higher dividend yield at 5.21% vs REG's 3.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $197.00 | $66.00 | $24.25 | $80.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 37 | 34 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +5.2% | +4.5% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | $1.06 | $2.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WSR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
WSR vs SPG vs O vs KIM vs REG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Realty Income Corporation (O) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regency Centers Corporation (REG) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 9x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regency Centers Corporation wins at 0. 52x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
Over the past 5 years, Whitestone REIT (WSR) delivered a total return of +132.
6%, compared to +18. 1% for Realty Income Corporation (O). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSR returned +88. 5% versus KIM's +11. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Realty Income Corporation (O) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Simon Property Group, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning SPG is approximately 433% more volatile than O relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Realty Income Corporation (O) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus 3. 4% for Regency Centers Corporation (REG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for Realty Income Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 18. 4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 52x versus Realty Income Corporation's 72. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 2x for Whitestone REIT — 19. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for O: 6. 6% to $66. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG?
In this comparison, O (5.
2% yield), KIM (4. 5% yield), REG (3. 6% yield) pay a dividend. WSR, SPG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WSR or SPG or O or KIM or REG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Realty Income Corporation (O) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 5. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (O: +45. 3%, SPG: +29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSR and SPG and O and KIM and REG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; REG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. O, KIM, REG pay a dividend while WSR, SPG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.