REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $974M | $122M | $756M | $5.04B | $686M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $165M | $99M | $252M | $739M | $155M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $12M | $-32M | $115M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 66.8% | 91.1% | 71.1% | -2.8% |
| Operating Margin | 32.9% | 38.8% | 11.5% | 37.6% | 22.9% |
| Forward P/E | 49.1x | — | — | 53.8x | 55.9x |
| Total Debt | $644M | $484M | $1.56B | $2.49B | $648M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $24M | $14M | $4M | $6M |
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whitestone REIT (WSR) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Wheeler Real Estate… (WHLR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
| Phillips Edison & C… (PECO) | 100 | 696.5 | +596.5% |
| CTO Realty Growth, … (CTO) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (49.1x vs 55.9x)
- 30.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- +54.5% vs WHLR's -99.8%
- 4.4% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 3.7% vs 1.1%
WHLR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NXRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PECO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 96.3%, current ratio 0.66x
- PEG 0.69 vs WSR's 1.05
- Beta 0.27 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage
CTO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 8.6%
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 122.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- Beta 0.37, yield 8.6%, current ratio 2.33x
- 20.1% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% FFO/revenue growth vs WHLR's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (49.1x vs 55.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs WHLR's 2.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NXRT's 7.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs WHLR's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 3.7% vs 1.1% |
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTO leads in 1 of 6 categories
WHLR leads 1 • WSR leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • PECO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PECO is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 7.4x WHLR's $99M. WSR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, CTO holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $165M | $99M | $252M | $739M | $155M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $62M | $125M | $542M | $94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $12M | -$32M | $115M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $4M | $79M | $207M | $69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +66.8% | +91.1% | +71.1% | -2.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +38.8% | +11.5% | +37.6% | +22.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +11.9% | -12.7% | +15.6% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +4.0% | +31.2% | +28.0% | +44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | -8.8% | +0.5% | +7.0% | +15.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -100.0% | 0.0% | +14.3% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WSR and WHLR and NXRT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, WSR trades at a 92% valuation discount to CTO's 254.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSR offers better value at 0.43x vs PECO's 0.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $974M | $122M | $756M | $5.0B | $686M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $582M | $2.3B | $7.5B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.96x | -0.03x | -23.65x | 45.00x | 254.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.12x | — | — | 53.84x | 55.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — | — | 0.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.03x | 9.79x | 18.60x | 16.20x | 14.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.06x | 1.21x | 3.01x | 6.89x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 1.29x | 2.52x | 2.15x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.19x | 30.27x | 9.05x | 23.80x | 13.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WHLR delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. PECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSR scores 7/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +12.5% | -10.1% | +4.5% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +1.9% | -1.7% | +2.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +4.9% | +1.1% | +3.0% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +6.0% | +1.5% | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 5.11x | 5.18x | 0.96x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $639M | $460M | $1.5B | $2.5B | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $24M | $14M | $4M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $644M | $484M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $648M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.52x | 1.44x | 0.47x | 2.17x | 1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for WHLR. Over the past 12 months, WSR leads with a +54.5% total return vs WHLR's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSR at 33.6% vs WHLR's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -93.3% | +2.6% | +14.8% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.5% | -99.8% | -15.2% | +16.4% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.5% | -100.0% | -15.5% | +44.0% | +52.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.0% | -100.0% | -23.0% | +640.2% | +58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | +100.2% | +211.1% | +693.0% | +79.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.6% | -99.0% | -5.5% | +12.9% | +15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WSR and PECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WHLR's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSR currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs WHLR's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 2.39x | 0.62x | 0.27x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.01 | $904.50 | $38.30 | $40.71 | $20.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.43 | $1.03 | $23.79 | $32.84 | $15.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +0.1% | +77.8% | +98.4% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.1 | 22.9 | 71.0 | 63.0 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 479K | 219K | 216K | 822K | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and CTO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSR as "Hold", WHLR as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", PECO as "Buy", CTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for CTO (target: $22) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, CTO offers the higher dividend yield at 8.63% vs PECO's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | — | $27.00 | $39.60 | $21.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% | +7.1% | +2.8% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | $2.11 | $1.13 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
CTO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WHLR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
WSR vs WHLR vs NXRT vs PECO vs CTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
(CTO) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Whitestone REIT (WSR) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (49. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
On trailing P/E, Whitestone REIT (WSR) is the cheapest at 20.
0x versus CTO Realty Growth, Inc. at 254. 1x. On forward P/E, Whitestone REIT is actually cheaper at 49. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. wins at 0. 69x versus Whitestone REIT's 1. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus CTO's +79. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning WHLR is approximately 777% more volatile than PECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
(CTO) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -4. 0% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CTO Realty Growth, Inc. grew EPS 122. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
Whitestone REIT (WSR) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
0% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WHLR leads at 36. 4% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus Whitestone REIT's 1. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Whitestone REIT (WSR) trades at 49. 1x forward P/E versus 55. 9x for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTO: 5. 9% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO?
In this comparison, CTO (8.
6% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), WHLR (5. 4% yield), PECO (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. WSR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WSR or WHLR or NXRT or PECO or CTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, WHLR: +100. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSR and WHLR and NXRT and PECO and CTO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WHLR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTO is a small-cap high-growth stock. WHLR, NXRT, PECO, CTO pay a dividend while WSR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.