Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.42B | $355M | $9.63B | $3.86B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $7M | $-92K | $1.10B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-383M | $-17M | $-327M | $376M | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | 66.1% | 99.2% | — | 91.5% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -49.7% | -5.9% | — | 7.4% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 55.6x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $1M | $110K | $52M | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $199M | $13M | $357M | $178M | $985M |
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenon Pharmaceutica… (XENE) | 100 | 580.7 | +480.7% |
| Ovid Therapeutics I… (OVID) | 100 | 54.8 | -45.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 141.2 | +41.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XENE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.05
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 13.42x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 13.42x
OVID has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 35.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.0%
- 11.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- +8.2% vs ACAD's +52.4%
Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs XENE's -46.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs XENE's -42.0%, ROIC 10.0% vs -55.3%
PTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 55.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 55.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs XENE's -46.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ACAD's +52.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs XENE's -42.0%, ROIC 10.0% vs -55.3% |
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories
XENE leads 0 • OVID leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OVID and ACAD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XENE's -46.1%. On growth, OVID holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $7M | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$411M | -$42M | -$357M | $96M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$383M | -$17M | -$327M | $376M | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$307M | -$38M | -$283M | $212M | -$229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.1% | +99.2% | — | +91.5% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.7% | -5.9% | — | +7.4% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.1% | -2.4% | — | +34.3% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.3% | -5.3% | — | +19.4% | -27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +8.4% | — | +9.7% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.0% | +192.3% | +2.7% | -81.8% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 16% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $355M | $9.6B | $3.9B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $344M | $9.3B | $3.7B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.84x | -11.38x | -24.72x | 9.85x | 8.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 55.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 26.91x | 5.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 589.47x | 49.01x | — | 3.61x | 3.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.63x | 1.54x | 8.54x | 3.15x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 36.74x | 7.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACAD and PTCT each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-49 for XENE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.2% | -24.0% | -43.0% | +35.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -42.0% | -18.6% | -40.2% | +26.2% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -55.3% | -36.2% | -65.0% | +10.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -43.8% | -37.8% | -49.3% | +10.1% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$191M | -$12M | -$357M | -$126M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $13M | $357M | $178M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $1M | $110,000 | $52M | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XENE and OVID and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XENE five years ago would be worth $30,254 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,845 for OVID. Over the past 12 months, OVID leads with a +816.7% total return vs ACAD's +52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs OVID's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.9% | +55.1% | +16.4% | -13.7% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.5% | +816.7% | +775.0% | +52.4% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.8% | -21.1% | +1976.5% | +4.7% | +16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.5% | -21.6% | -20.8% | +7.1% | +60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +737.1% | -77.7% | -20.1% | -22.9% | +733.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | -7.6% | +174.9% | +1.5% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XENE and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XENE is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs PTCT's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.33x | 1.40x | 1.11x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.95 | $3.10 | $356.00 | $27.81 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.19 | $0.27 | $35.18 | $14.45 | $37.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +87.9% | +93.6% | +81.1% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 56.2 | 55.6 | 44.2 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 3.5M | 378K | 1.8M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XENE as "Buy", OVID as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.7% upside for PRAX (target: $549) vs 28.2% for OVID (target: $4).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $86.78 | $3.50 | $548.80 | $34.78 | $98.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 14 | 16 | 37 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 4 categories are tied.
XENE vs OVID vs PRAX vs ACAD vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is the stronger pick with 1181% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (XENE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(XENE) delivered a total return of +202. 5%, compared to -21. 6% for Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (OVID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus OVID's -77. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(XENE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning PRAX is approximately 37% more volatile than XENE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is pulling ahead at 1181% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -44. 9% for Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OVID leads at 69. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -46. 1% for Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -49. 7% for XENE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVID leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 64.
7% to $548. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XENE or OVID or PRAX or ACAD or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, PRAX: -20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XENE and OVID and PRAX and ACAD and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XENE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OVID is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.