Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $350M | $147M | $3.75B | $2.90B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.81B | $14.20B | $17.17B | $13.07B | $1.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.25B | $1.61B | $6.89B | $2.80B | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | 35.4% | 61.8% | 79.3% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | 16.1% | 43.9% | 19.4% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.6x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $5.27B | $1.65B | $34M | $1.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.84B | $2.25B | $4.45B | $4.67B | $657M |
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yiren Digital Ltd. (YRD) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 112.0 | +12.0% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 191.8 | +91.8% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YRD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.25, yield 10.1%, current ratio 5.61x
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.02
- 10.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, LX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
QFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- PEG 0.02 vs UPST's 1.02
- NIM 14.3% vs YRD's 0.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
FINV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
- -35.3% vs LX's -70.4%
UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.3% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% |
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
FINV leads 2 • YRD leads 1 • LX leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 16.0x UPST's $1.1B. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $14.2B | $17.2B | $13.1B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $1.8B | $8.0B | $3.3B | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $1.6B | $6.9B | $2.8B | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $884M | $0 | $10.8B | $1.5B | -$146M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.8% | +35.4% | +61.8% | +79.3% | +95.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +16.1% | +43.9% | +19.4% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +7.7% | +36.5% | +18.2% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +5.9% | +53.5% | +21.9% | -15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +110.3% | -9.7% | -2.1% | -169.2% |
Valuation Metrics
YRD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.8x trailing earnings, YRD trades at a 99% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), YRD offers better value at 0.10x vs UPST's 4.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $350M | $147M | $3.8B | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$208M | $590M | $3.3B | $2.2B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.76x | 2.16x | 2.15x | 3.85x | 64.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.20x | 0.35x | 0.47x | 0.65x | 14.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.10x | — | 0.11x | 1.13x | 4.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.85x | 1.65x | 2.99x | 5.76x | 50.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.07x | 1.49x | 1.51x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | 0.22x | 0.56x | 0.59x | 3.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.69x | 1.20x | 2.78x | 6.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $7 for UPST. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs YRD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.7% | +14.7% | +28.8% | +17.4% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +7.2% | +12.2% | +11.2% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.0% | +11.0% | +23.1% | +12.9% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +19.5% | +35.6% | +13.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.49x | 0.07x | 0.00x | 2.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.8B | $3.0B | -$2.8B | -$4.6B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $2.3B | $4.5B | $4.7B | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $5.3B | $1.7B | $34M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 153.26x | — | — | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FINV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $9,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, FINV leads with a -35.3% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPST at 29.4% vs QFIN's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.0% | -31.8% | -22.5% | +3.6% | -36.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.1% | -70.4% | -63.6% | -35.3% | -37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | +8.1% | +0.6% | +45.1% | +116.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | -66.4% | -19.1% | -2.3% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | -74.1% | +16.1% | -47.5% | -1.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +2.6% | +0.2% | +13.2% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FINV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FINV is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.25x | 1.20x | 1.12x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.68 | $9.35 | $47.00 | $10.90 | $87.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.58 | $2.02 | $12.30 | $4.50 | $23.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.4% | +22.0% | +28.1% | +47.0% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 44.7 | 53.7 | 58.4 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 101K | 1.5M | 1.4M | 1.3M | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — YRD and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YRD as "Sell", LX as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy", UPST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, YRD offers the higher dividend yield at 10.14% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $28.15 | $5.94 | $45.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.1% | +6.9% | +9.3% | +4.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $0.97 | $8.32 | $1.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% | +11.6% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FINV leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
YRD vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV vs UPST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). Yiren Digital Ltd. (YRD) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E (0. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
On trailing P/E, Yiren Digital Ltd.
(YRD) is the cheapest at 0. 8x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Yiren Digital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of -2.
3%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus LX's -74. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FinVolution Group (FINV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 164% more volatile than FINV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Upstart Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 131. 3% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for Yiren Digital Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 5. 0% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Yiren Digital Ltd. (YRD) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST?
In this comparison, YRD (10.
1% yield), QFIN (9. 3% yield), LX (6. 9% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. UPST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YRD or LX or QFIN or FINV or UPST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 4. 8% yield). Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FINV: -47. 5%, UPST: -1. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YRD and LX and QFIN and FINV and UPST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YRD is a small-cap high-growth stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock. YRD, LX, QFIN, FINV pay a dividend while UPST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.