Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.28B | $23.90B | $27.70B | $24.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.99B | $11.19B | $12.35B | $9.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $852M | $1.83B | $1.70B | $2.16B |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 62.3% | 57.6% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 20.6% | 15.3% | 28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 11.9x | 12.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.37B | $11.00B | $12.40B | $4.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.50B | $1.29B | $11.24B | $10.91B |
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zions Bancorporatio… (ZION) | 100 | 190.6 | +90.6% |
| KeyCorp (KEY) | 100 | 183.0 | +83.0% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 266.4 | +166.4% |
| Regions Financial C… (RF) | 100 | 247.2 | +147.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZION carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 12.4x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RF's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RF's 0.5%
KEY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.6%, EPS growth 5.8%
- 23.6% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3%
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +73.3% vs RF's +39.6%
RF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 3.7%
- 283.3% 10Y total return vs CFG's 257.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 0.30x
- PEG 0.62 vs KEY's 3.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.6% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RF's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ZION's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ZION's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs RF's +39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RF's 0.5% |
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RF leads in 3 of 6 categories
CFG leads 1 • ZION leads 0 • KEY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 2.5x ZION's $5.0B. RF is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $11.2B | $12.3B | $9.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.3B | $2.6B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $852M | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $961M | $1.4B | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +62.3% | +57.6% | +74.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +20.6% | +15.3% | +28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +16.3% | +12.2% | +22.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | — | +15.2% | +22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +2.5% | +38.2% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZION and RF each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, RF trades at a 42% valuation discount to CFG's 21.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RF offers better value at 0.70x vs KEY's 3.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $23.9B | $27.7B | $24.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $33.6B | $28.9B | $18.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.67x | 14.26x | 21.19x | 12.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.75x | 11.94x | 12.39x | 10.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.58x | 3.90x | — | 0.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.93x | 14.48x | 12.10x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.14x | 2.24x | 2.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.17x | 1.20x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.83x | — | 14.74x | 11.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZION delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. RF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZION's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RF scores 9/9 vs KEY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +9.0% | +6.6% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +5.4% | +3.8% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +7.0% | +4.4% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.54x | 0.51x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $866M | $9.7B | $1.2B | -$6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $1.3B | $11.2B | $10.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $11.0B | $12.4B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.61x | 0.55x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $14,687 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,140 for KEY. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs RF's +39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZION at 40.9% vs RF's 23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.6% | +4.3% | +9.7% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.1% | +47.7% | +73.3% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.6% | +149.4% | +169.3% | +88.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +11.4% | +46.9% | +41.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.5% | +141.8% | +257.8% | +283.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.9% | +35.6% | +39.1% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZION and RF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RF is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZION's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZION currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs RF's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.12x | 1.33x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.18 | $23.35 | $68.79 | $31.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.25 | $15.16 | $37.93 | $20.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +92.8% | +93.3% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 61.8 | 60.2 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 13.8M | 4.5M | 11.8M |
Analyst Outlook
RF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZION as "Hold", KEY as "Buy", CFG as "Buy", RF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.8% upside for CFG (target: $72) vs 6.6% for KEY (target: $23). For income investors, RF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.71% vs CFG's 2.64%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.83 | $23.11 | $72.42 | $30.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 51 | 38 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | — | +2.6% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.68 | — | $1.70 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +4.9% | +4.4% |
RF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ZION vs KEY vs CFG vs RF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZION or KEY or CFG or RF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KeyCorp (KEY) is the stronger pick with 23.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Regions Financial Corporation (RF) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KeyCorp (KEY) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
On trailing P/E, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Zions Bancorporation, National Association is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regions Financial Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus KeyCorp's 3. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
(CFG) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to +11. 4% for KeyCorp (KEY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RF returned +283. 3% versus KEY's +141. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 1. 37β — meaning ZION is approximately 24% more volatile than RF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 71% for Zions Bancorporation, National Association — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KeyCorp (KEY) is pulling ahead at 23.
6% versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KeyCorp grew EPS 575. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
4% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RF leads at 28. 5% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RF leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZION or KEY or CFG or RF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus KeyCorp's 3. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CFG: 12. 8% to $72. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZION or KEY or CFG or RF?
In this comparison, RF (3.
7% yield), ZION (2. 7% yield), CFG (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. KEY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZION or KEY or CFG or RF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 3. 7% yield, +283. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RF: +283. 3%, KEY: +141. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZION and KEY and CFG and RF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZION is a small-cap deep-value stock; KEY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ZION, CFG, RF pay a dividend while KEY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.