Quantitative Stock StrategyVerified Methodology

High Quality Stocks: Companies Passing 5 Quality Gates

Strategy developed by VCP Scanner Editorial Team

Quality factor composite: every stock here passes five independent tests simultaneously — ROE ≥ 15% (equity profitability), ROIC ≥ 12% (capital efficiency), gross margin ≥ 30% (pricing power), FCF margin ≥ 8% (cash generation), and D/E ≤ 1 (leverage discipline). At $2B+ market cap where quality has been cycle-tested. Sorted by ROE descending — the most profitable equity compounders rank first.

SafetyQuality8 live rules

How We Build This List

ROE ≥ 15% (Equity Profitability Gate)15% ROE is roughly 1.5× cost of equity — the threshold where management creates real shareholder value. Below this, capital destruction is likely after accounting for risk-adjusted required returns.
ROIC ≥ 12% (Capital Efficiency Gate)ROIC measures returns on all capital — debt plus equity — stripping out leverage effects. 12%+ ensures the business earns well above its weighted cost of capital regardless of capital structure.
Gross Margin ≥ 30% (Pricing Power / Moat Proxy)Companies with 30%+ gross margin charge premium prices because customers choose them — brand power, switching costs, or network effects. Below 30%, businesses compete primarily on cost and have fragile profitability.
FCF Margin ≥ 8% (Cash Generation Gate)Reported earnings can be engineered through accruals. Free cash flow margin ≥ 8% confirms the business actually generates cash — $8+ per $100 revenue after all capital expenditures.
Debt/Equity ≤ 1 (Leverage Discipline)Limits financial engineering. High ROE with high leverage is fragile; high ROE with contained debt reflects genuine business quality. D/E ≤ 1 keeps leverage reasonable without excluding companies that use modest debt productively.
Market Cap ≥ $2B (Established Scale)Quality metrics are most reliable at scale. $2B+ companies have survived downturns, faced competitive threats, and maintained quality through cycles — not just during favorable conditions.

Open Screener →

50 stocks foundUpdated 2026-05-06T14:45:45.168Z

Customize Filters →

Ticker	Company	Price	Mkt Cap	ROE	ROIC	Gross M
UI	Ubiquiti Inc.	$1014.90	$61.4B	186.5%	81.4%	43.4%
SEZL	Sezzle Inc.	$85.19	$2.88B	103.3%	52.7%	85.4%
NVDA	NVIDIA Corporation	$196.50	$4.78T	101.5%	81.8%	71.1%
ADMA	ADMA Biologics, Inc.	$10.25	$2.44B	81.6%	37.7%	51.5%
MANH	Manhattan Associates, Inc.	$141.15	$8.36B	71.7%	236.8%	55.7%
MEDP	Medpace Holdings, Inc.	$430.32	$12.29B	70.2%	154.9%	30.1%
IDXX	IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.	$562.97	$44.83B	66.2%	42.5%	61.8%
AMP	Ameriprise Financial, Inc.	$474.65	$45.71B	60.5%	31.3%	50.4%
RRR	Red Rock Resorts, Inc.	$52.92	$3.13B	58.9%	23.4%	52.6%
LRCX	Lam Research Corporation	$275.80	$344.41B	58.2%	55.7%	48.7%
PEGA	Pegasystems Inc.	$36.95	$6.25B	57.3%	27.2%	75.9%
ADBE	Adobe Inc.	$255.62	$105.57B	55.4%	51.4%	88.6%
TMDX	TransMedics Group, Inc.	$94.93	$3.28B	54.2%	18.8%	59.9%
V	Visa Inc.	$322.03	$617.8B	52.1%	29.2%	80.4%
WSM	Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	$180.27	$22.2B	51.5%	44.3%	46.2%
BOX	Box, Inc.	$25.21	$3.63B	51.4%	64.7%	79.2%
VRRM	Verra Mobility Corporation	$14.50	$2.23B	49%	23.5%	96.9%
BKE	The Buckle, Inc.	$53.61	$2.72B	46.7%	38.4%	48.7%
ULTA	Ulta Beauty, Inc.	$532.60	$24.37B	43.6%	87.9%	39.1%
NFLX	Netflix, Inc.	$87.89	$372.42B	42.8%	29.8%	48.5%
SCCO	Southern Copper Corporation	$171.03	$141.28B	42.6%	38.6%	56.7%
DECK	Deckers Outdoor Corporation	$98.54	$14.03B	41.8%	99.7%	57.9%
VRT	Vertiv Holdings Co	$341.02	$130.99B	41.8%	28.1%	34.4%
IDCC	InterDigital, Inc.	$287.13	$7.39B	41.5%	40.9%	80.3%
CTAS	Cintas Corporation	$169.25	$68.2B	40.3%	25.8%	50%
MC	Moelis & Company	$63.49	$4.66B	40.2%	24.9%	99.2%
UBER	Uber Technologies, Inc.	$72.95	$151.58B	39.8%	13.6%	39.8%
ADSK	Autodesk, Inc.	$249.43	$53.38B	39.7%	33.3%	96.8%
ALL	The Allstate Corporation	$218.51	$56.25B	39.6%	29.8%	33.2%
ROL	Rollins, Inc.	$54.11	$26.08B	38.9%	23.5%	49.4%

See all 50 stocks →

What Makes a Stock 'High Quality'?

Quality investing focuses on business excellence — companies that earn high returns on capital, generate real cash, and maintain competitive advantages without excessive leverage.

This screen tests five dimensions simultaneously:

Profitability (ROE): Does management convert equity into earnings efficiently?
Capital efficiency (ROIC): Does the business earn above its cost of ALL capital?
Pricing power (Gross Margin): Can it charge premium prices?
Cash conversion (FCF Margin): Do profits turn into actual cash?
Financial discipline (D/E): Are returns genuine or inflated by leverage?

Any single metric can mislead. The composite gate requires quality across every dimension — passing all five simultaneously is what makes this screen selective.

The Quality Factor: Why It Works

Quality is one of the most robust factors in asset pricing. Key findings:

Novy-Marx (2013): Gross profitability predicts returns as well as book-to-market ratio.
Asness et al. (2019): "Quality Minus Junk" earns 3–5% annual risk-adjusted excess return with lower drawdowns.
Fama & French (2015): Added profitability factor to their model — quality explains returns that size and value can't.

Why does quality work? Investors overpay for speculative "lottery ticket" stocks, compressing their returns. Quality stocks are genuinely safer, and their steadier returns attract less speculative capital — creating a persistent pricing gap.

During downturns: Quality stocks historically experience smaller drawdowns. High profitability + low leverage = financial cushion that low-quality companies lack.

ROE vs. ROIC: Why This Screen Uses Both

ROE = Net Income ÷ Equity. Measures return on the owners' stake. Can be inflated by leverage — borrow heavily and ROE rises even if the underlying business is mediocre.

ROIC = NOPAT ÷ Invested Capital (debt + equity). Measures returns on ALL capital, eliminating the leverage illusion.

What the combination reveals:

High ROE + High ROIC: Genuine quality. This is the target.
High ROE + Low ROIC: Leverage-inflated returns. Warning sign.
Low ROE + High ROIC: Over-equitized or accounting artifacts. Worth investigating.

By requiring both ROE ≥ 15% AND ROIC ≥ 12% with D/E ≤ 1, this screen makes it extremely difficult to game quality through financial engineering.

Gross Margin as a Moat Indicator

Gross margin reveals pricing power — the most direct quantitative proxy for competitive advantage.

60%+: Exceptional — software, luxury, pharma. (Microsoft ~70%, Visa ~80%)
40–60%: Strong moat — branded goods, medical devices, semis. (Apple ~46%, P&G ~52%)
30–40%: Moderate moat — this screen's floor. (Honeywell ~36%, Deere ~37%)
Below 30%: Weak or no moat — commodity businesses, price competitors.

Watch the trend: Compare current gross margin to the 3-year average on stock detail pages. Rising = moat widening. Declining = moat eroding, even if the absolute level still passes.

FCF Margin: The Cash Reality Check

FCF Margin = Free Cash Flow ÷ Revenue. Does reported profitability turn into actual cash?

Why some "profitable" companies fail this test:

Capital-intensive: 15% net margin but 12% capex-to-revenue = only 3% FCF margin.
Working capital traps: Fast growers build inventory faster than they collect cash.
Acquisition-dependent: Serial acquirers show strong earnings but negative FCF after deal spending.

The earnings–FCF gap: Compare net margin to FCF margin in the table. They should be close. If net margin is 20% but FCF margin is 5%, that signals aggressive accruals or heavy capex needs.

Using This Screen: Beyond the Numbers

Verify trajectory: Is ROE rising, flat, or declining over 3–5 years? A 16% ROE trending up beats 18% trending down. Check stock detail pages for history.
Assess valuation: Quality stocks often deserve premium P/E, but overpaying still hurts 3–5 year returns. Compare to 5-year average and sector median.
Understand the moat: Gross margin tells you a moat exists, not why. Brand? Network effects? Switching costs? The source determines durability.
Size by conviction: Quality portfolios typically hold 15–30 positions. Not all quality stocks deserve equal weight.
Monitor for degradation: Two-quarter declines in any quality metric without clear temporary cause = thesis may be breaking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes this different from the Buffett Stocks screen?

Buffett uses 5-year average ROE (sustained quality) with D/E ≤ 0.5 (stricter debt). This screen uses current TTM metrics across five dimensions as a composite quality gate. Buffett is a named strategy focused on proven consistency; this is a broader quality factor screen.

What makes this different from the High ROE Stocks screen?

High ROE uses one primary gate — ROE ≥ 20%. This screen uses ROE at 15% but adds four more tests (ROIC, gross margin, FCF margin, D/E). A company with 25% ROE from leverage can pass that screen but fail this one. The composite is stricter overall.

Why ROE ≥ 15% instead of 20%?

Five simultaneous filters make each threshold collectively strict. At 20% ROE AND 12% ROIC AND 30% gross margin AND 8% FCF AND D/E ≤ 1, very few stocks pass. 15% is still well above the S&P 500 median (~13%).

Why ≥ 12% for ROIC specifically?

12% exceeds the typical WACC for US large-caps (7–10%). A company earning 12%+ ROIC creates economic value — returns above the cost of all capital deployed.

Does this screen exclude financials and utilities?

Not explicitly, but effectively yes for most. Banks rarely have 30%+ gross margins; utilities carry D/E well above 1. Some exchanges, insurance companies, and specialty financials can pass all five gates.

Why is D/E ≤ 1 used here instead of D/E ≤ 0.5?

D/E 0.5 is Buffett's ultra-conservative preference. This screen uses 1.0 to include quality companies in industrials and healthcare that use moderate, productive leverage. It still excludes heavily leveraged companies where ROE is artificially inflated.

How many stocks typically pass all five quality gates?

Usually 40–80 US-listed stocks above $2B market cap. The number fluctuates with the cycle — shrinks during recoveries (compressed margins), expands mid-cycle (rebuilt margins). The multi-gate requirement is much more selective than any single filter.

What sectors are typically well-represented?

Technology (software, semis), Healthcare (pharma, devices), and Consumer Staples (branded goods) dominate due to naturally high gross margins and strong FCF. Industrials and Consumer Discretionary appear selectively. Energy, Materials, and Financials are rare.

Is this a good screen for defensive / recession-resistant stocks?

Partially. Quality stocks historically outperform during downturns because of their financial cushion. But this screen doesn't filter for low beta, dividend history, or counter-cyclical revenue. For dedicated recession protection, try the Defensive or Recession-Proof screens.

How often should I review stocks from this screen?

Monthly is sufficient — quality metrics move slowly with quarterly earnings. Watch for two-consecutive-quarter declines in any metric as a warning. Quality investing is a patient strategy with 2–5+ year holding periods.

Open the Screener

Start with these ideas, customize the filters, or build from scratch using 200+ financial metrics.

Open Screener