Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 44.3x · EV/EBITDA 20.6x · ROE 19.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $3.0B | $2.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 44.34 | 39.63 | 23.65 | 10.69 | 19.58 | 10.03 | 33.86 | 79.79 | 47.47 | 25.15 | 25.24 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.84 | 5.25 | 4.54 | 4.87 | 5.48 | 6.47 | 7.13 | 7.47 | 6.70 | 8.78 | 9.62 |
| P/B Ratio | 11.47 | 10.25 | 5.81 | 4.61 | 4.77 | 5.28 | 6.99 | 6.67 | 1.62 | 1.70 | 2.12 |
| P/FCF | 16.96 | 15.24 | 18.98 | 10.04 | 11.00 | 11.26 | 18.19 | 13.41 | 22.41 | 16.88 | 18.93 |
| P/OCF | 16.96 | 15.24 | 18.98 | 10.04 | 11.00 | 11.26 | 18.19 | 13.41 | 21.20 | 16.41 | 16.69 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.07 | 7.91 | 7.36 | 9.83 | 9.51 | 10.79 | 10.44 | 10.47 | 12.83 | 12.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.55 | 19.29 | 14.96 | 11.02 | 18.25 | 17.69 | 16.40 | 17.38 | 18.23 | 20.55 | 21.16 |
| EV / EBIT | 31.61 | 24.22 | 16.86 | 19.60 | 23.47 | 13.04 | 29.80 | 23.88 | 24.10 | 26.41 | 27.09 |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.33 | 33.11 | 15.18 | 19.74 | 16.54 | 27.51 | 18.75 | 35.04 | 24.65 | 25.55 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 16.1% | 16.1% | 100.0% | 55.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 55.6% | 60.4% | 59.7% | 63.1% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | 36.1% | 52.2% | 38.6% | 37.0% | 52.4% | 44.0% | 43.2% | 45.7% | 46.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.2% | 13.2% | 19.2% | 45.5% | 28.0% | 64.5% | 21.1% | 9.4% | 14.1% | 34.9% | 38.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.7% | 19.7% | 21.0% | 43.2% | 23.6% | 58.3% | 18.4% | 3.5% | 3.1% | 7.2% | 12.5% |
| ROA | 2.3% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 7.3% | 4.1% | 9.5% | 3.1% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 5.2% | 6.0% |
| ROIC | 5.2% | 5.2% | 7.1% | 9.1% | 5.9% | 6.3% | 8.4% | 5.4% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| ROCE | 5.5% | 5.5% | 6.2% | 8.7% | 5.9% | 5.6% | 8.0% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 7.0% | 7.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 8.64 | 8.64 | 6.24 | 4.60 | 4.61 | 4.31 | 5.69 | 3.83 | 1.21 | 1.04 | 1.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.41 | 9.41 | 9.21 | 7.27 | 9.84 | 9.84 | 8.83 | 7.14 | 8.69 | 8.62 | 7.56 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 7.47 | 4.32 | 2.36 | 3.79 | 2.48 | 3.58 | 2.65 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.13 | 8.13 | 6.39 | 3.73 | 8.08 | 5.65 | 5.56 | 4.95 | 6.57 | 6.48 | 5.48 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.10 | 14.13 | 5.14 | 8.74 | 5.28 | 9.32 | 5.34 | 12.63 | 7.77 | 6.62 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.69 | 1.45 | 3.01 | 7.63 | 2.98 | 2.54 | 2.27 | 3.56 | 4.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.33 | 8.33 | 12.80 | 13.04 | 12.38 | 13.73 | 16.53 | 15.09 | 21.56 | 17.75 | 13.80 |
| Quick Ratio | 8.33 | 8.33 | 12.80 | 13.04 | 12.38 | 13.73 | 16.53 | 15.09 | 21.56 | 17.75 | 13.80 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.49 | 3.49 | 8.48 | 10.14 | 9.32 | 10.17 | 11.79 | 9.42 | 9.69 | 7.56 | 7.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.4% | 8.3% | 9.0% | 8.4% | 8.2% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 5.9% | 4.3% | 3.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 327.5% | 327.5% | 212.6% | 90.1% | 160.1% | 69.4% | 219.8% | 435.1% | 280.4% | 108.0% | 94.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 9.4% | 5.1% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 1.3% | 2.1% | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 6.6% | 5.3% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 5.5% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.4% | 8.3% | 9.0% | 8.4% | 8.2% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 5.9% | 4.3% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M | $5M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALX stock.
Alexander's, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 44.3x. The historical average is 29.2x. This places it at the 81th percentile of its historical range.
Alexander's, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.7x.
Alexander's, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.7%. The historical average is 42.9%.
Based on historical data, Alexander's, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 44.3x. This is at the 81th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alexander's, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 7.38% with a payout ratio of 327.5%.
Alexander's, Inc. has 16.1% gross margin and 30.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Alexander's, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Bloomberg lease concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Distorted by One-Time Gain
ALX trades at 43.5x trailing FFO, but the 2026Q2 FFO spike to $31.84 per share appears non-recurring, inflating the multiple, per reported quarterly data.
The P/FFO of 43.5x in 2026Q2 is misleading because FFO per share surged to $31.84 from $2.62 in the prior quarter, likely due to a one-time gain. Excluding that gain, the implied P/FFO would be substantially higher, suggesting the market is pricing in a normalized earnings power that may not be sustainable. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, appears low relative to private market transactions for NYC assets, but the lack of consistent NOI data across quarters makes this comparison unreliable. Investors should monitor whether the company provides normalized FFO guidance to better assess valuation.
NOI Margin Volatility Masks Stability
NOI margin swung from 100% in 2026Q2 to 45.7% in 2026Q1, but full-year margins appear stable, according to financial statements, suggesting timing effects rather than operational deterioration.
The extreme quarterly swings in NOI margin—from 100% to 13.1%—are likely due to the timing of property expenses and non-cash items, as the prior income statement analysis noted. The underlying profitability appears stable, with operating margins around 30%, but the 16.1% gross margin is unusually low for a REIT, possibly reflecting ground lease obligations or property-level costs classified upstream. This divergence warrants investigation into the cost structure, as it may indicate that a significant portion of property expenses are being captured in cost of sales rather than operating expenses, which could distort true NOI.
Dividend Coverage Hinges on One-Time Gain
In 2026Q2, FFO payout ratio was 28.3%, but excluding the non-recurring gain, coverage appears closer to 0.3x, based on reported figures, raising sustainability concerns.
The FFO payout ratio of 28.3% in 2026Q2 is artificially low because FFO per share was inflated by a likely one-time gain. In prior quarters, the payout ratio ranged from 88.7% to 184%, indicating that without the gain, dividends may not be fully covered by recurring FFO. The AFFO payout ratio is not reported, but given the high cash balance of $128M, the company may be using reserves to fund dividends. Investors should monitor whether the company can generate sufficient recurring FFO to cover its dividend, especially if the Bloomberg lease is renegotiated at lower terms.
Leverage Drops to Multi-Year Low
Debt-to-equity fell to 3.83 in 2026Q2 from 4.75 a year earlier, with total debt down to $856.6M, indicating a conservative leverage profile, as reported in quarterly data.
The balance sheet has deleveraged significantly over the past year, with total debt declining from $1.2B to $856.6M and cash rising to $358.3M. This has reduced debt-to-equity to 3.83, a multi-year low, and interest coverage improved to 15.39x in 2026Q2, though this is inflated by the one-time gain. Excluding that gain, interest coverage appears closer to 1.4x, which is thin and suggests that the company's cash flow may be barely sufficient to service debt. The high cash balance may indicate management is preparing for upcoming debt maturities or capital expenditures, but the source of this cash is unclear and warrants monitoring.
Concentrated NYC Portfolio Faces Retail Headwinds
With 100% geographic concentration in NYC and a seven-property portfolio, retail tenant churn is pressuring revenue, as evidenced by a 5.8% YoY decline, per financial statements.
The portfolio is hyper-concentrated in a few irreplaceable NYC locations, which provides a moat but also exposes the company to local economic downturns. The revenue decline of 5.8% YoY suggests ongoing retail weakness, likely at the Rego Park and Flushing centers, which may be experiencing tenant vacancies or rent concessions. The office segment, anchored by Bloomberg, appears stable, but the lack of diversification means any disruption to the Bloomberg lease would have a disproportionate impact. G&A efficiency appears lean due to the Vornado management agreement, but related-party fees could obscure true costs.
P/E Misleads for REIT with Depreciation
Standard P/E of 48.19 is distorted by depreciation and one-time gains, obscuring the company's true earnings power, as reported in financial statements, warranting use of FFO.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for ALX is the standard P/E, which is deeply misleading for REITs because depreciation on NYC skyscrapers is a non-cash charge that understates economic earnings. The reported P/E of 48.19 is further distorted by the one-time gain in 2026Q2, which inflated net income. Investors should use P/FFO or P/AFFO instead, but these are not consistently reported, and the FFO figures themselves are volatile due to non-recurring items. Additionally, the debt-to-equity ratio using book value is less relevant than debt-to-gross-assets, which would provide a clearer picture of leverage given the appreciated value of the underlying land.