Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.1x · EV/EBITDA 9.9x · ROE 10.5%. (1995–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.5B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $577M | $1.0B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.07 | 11.11 | 13.68 | 10.05 | 11.15 | 10.53 | 14.29 | 13.54 | 12.89 | 29.96 | 22.15 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.84 | 3.58 | 3.83 | 2.99 | 3.49 | 3.49 | 2.76 | 3.52 | 3.40 | 3.88 | 4.14 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.20 | 1.11 | 1.30 | 1.12 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 0.99 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.43 | 1.45 |
| P/FCF | 9.33 | 8.70 | 8.27 | 7.61 | 9.75 | 7.28 | 14.70 | 15.84 | 229.03 | 5.44 | — |
| P/OCF | 8.99 | 8.37 | 7.89 | 7.17 | 9.15 | 7.02 | 13.20 | 13.23 | 57.16 | 5.24 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.89 | 4.01 | 3.74 | 3.92 | 0.95 | 1.72 | 4.19 | 4.37 | 3.73 | 4.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.91 | 9.29 | 10.50 | 9.27 | 9.30 | 2.13 | 6.12 | 11.31 | 12.13 | 10.17 | 12.63 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.37 | 9.72 | 11.54 | 10.15 | 10.16 | 2.34 | 7.23 | 12.90 | 13.69 | 11.58 | 14.63 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.46 | 8.65 | 9.50 | 10.96 | 1.98 | 9.15 | 18.88 | 294.27 | 5.24 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.0% | 79.0% | 72.0% | 81.6% | 95.4% | 101.6% | 83.4% | 89.2% | 92.5% | 94.4% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 29.5% | 25.3% | 30.6% | 37.4% | 39.1% | 22.4% | 29.6% | 30.0% | 31.0% | 27.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.8% | 23.8% | 20.4% | 24.8% | 30.4% | 31.9% | 18.2% | 23.6% | 24.8% | 12.4% | 18.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.5% | 10.5% | 9.9% | 11.8% | 12.4% | 12.0% | 7.1% | 9.5% | 9.9% | 4.7% | 6.6% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | 7.7% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 7.9% | 8.5% | 8.1% | 4.7% | 6.1% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| ROCE | 10.1% | 10.1% | 8.3% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 6.6% | 8.4% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 8.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.48 | 1.48 | 2.63 | 2.87 | 1.95 | 2.19 | 3.62 | 3.30 | 4.15 | 1.13 | 1.70 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.18 | -0.91 | -0.38 | 0.24 | 0.34 | -0.05 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.45 | 1.85 | 1.02 | -5.70 | -3.71 | 1.82 | 2.69 | -0.39 | 0.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.77 | 0.37 | 1.89 | 1.20 | -5.30 | -5.55 | 3.04 | 65.24 | -0.20 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 1.81 | 12.42 | 10.44 | 3.76 | 3.22 | 5.06 | 7.86 | 7.90 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.9% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 2.8% | 2.7% | 5.7% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 34.6% | 34.6% | 39.5% | 36.4% | 31.3% | 28.7% | 81.2% | 38.3% | 43.4% | 108.2% | 33.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.3% | 9.0% | 7.3% | 10.0% | 9.0% | 9.5% | 7.0% | 7.4% | 7.8% | 3.3% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 10.7% | 11.5% | 12.1% | 13.1% | 10.3% | 13.7% | 6.8% | 6.3% | 0.4% | 18.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.6% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.4% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | 5.4% | 7.6% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $34M | $35M | $34M | $34M | $35M | $36M | $35M | $33M | $33M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BANR stock.
Banner Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.1x. The historical average is 17.1x. This places it at the 27th percentile of its historical range.
Banner Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 17.9x.
Banner Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.5%. The historical average is 5.8%.
Based on historical data, Banner Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.1x. This is at the 27th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Banner Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.88% with a payout ratio of 34.6%.
Banner Corporation has 79.0% gross margin and 29.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Banner Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression and regional concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced for Stability
BANR trades at 1.24x tangible book, a premium to peers like WAFD and HFWA, reflecting its stable funding base and conservative credit profile, as per recent market data.
The P/B of 1.24x is above the peer median of approximately 1.15x, suggesting the market assigns a modest premium for BANR's granular deposit franchise and lower-risk CRE mix. However, the forward P/E of 11.84x implies the market expects earnings to remain near current levels, with limited growth premium. This valuation appears reasonable if the bank can sustain its ROE, but it leaves little room for disappointment given the flat NIM trend.
ROE Stuck at Low Single Digits
ROE has hovered around 2.5-2.8% over the past ten quarters, as reported in financial statements, indicating a structurally low return profile despite a stable NIM of 0.9%.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the low ROE is driven by a very thin NIM of 0.9% and modest asset utilization, with leverage (equity/assets at 12%) providing limited amplification. Fee income, excluding volatile MSR swings, contributes only about 8% of revenue, so the bank relies heavily on interest income. This suggests that without a meaningful improvement in NIM or a shift toward higher-yielding assets, ROE is likely to remain in the low single digits, which may not justify the current premium valuation.
NIM Flat, Efficiency Improves
Net interest margin has been pinned at 0.9% for five consecutive quarters, per quarterly data, while the efficiency ratio improved to 47.3% in Q1 2026 from 49.2% a year earlier.
The flat NIM indicates that asset yields and funding costs are moving in lockstep, with no spread expansion. The efficiency ratio improvement suggests management is controlling expenses, but the absolute level remains high relative to more efficient peers like CVBF (efficiency ratio not shown but likely lower). The stable NIM, combined with negative revenue growth, implies that cost discipline is the primary lever supporting profitability, but this has limits.
Capital Buffer Supports Returns
Equity-to-assets ratio held steady at 12% in Q1 2026, according to balance sheet data, providing a solid capital base for dividends and buybacks.
With equity of $2.0 billion and a conservative leverage profile, BANR maintains a healthy capital position that supports its dividend yield of 2.8% and recent buyback activity. The low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19% further underscores a fortress-like balance sheet. However, the high equity ratio also dilutes ROE, and the bank's ability to return capital is constrained by the need to maintain this buffer, especially if unrealized losses in the securities portfolio were to materialize.
Credit Quality Contained, Reserves Stable
Provision for loan losses was a negative $796K in Q1 2026, as per income statement data, indicating a release and suggesting credit quality remains stable.
The negative provision implies that management sees no deterioration in the loan book, and the loan loss reserve appears adequate. However, the bank's high concentration in Pacific Northwest commercial real estate, particularly multifamily and owner-occupied properties, warrants monitoring. If regional economic conditions weaken, provisioning could increase, but current data suggest reserves are sufficient to absorb near-term losses.
Premium Valuation vs. Peers
BANR's P/B of 1.24x exceeds the peer median of 1.15x, while its ROE of 2.8% lags most peers, as per comparative data, indicating a valuation disconnect.
Compared to COLB (P/B 1.18x, ROE 9.2%) and WAFD (P/B 0.97x, ROE 8.4%), BANR trades at a premium despite a significantly lower ROE. This suggests the market is pricing in the stability of its funding base and credit quality, but the gap may be too wide. If the bank cannot improve its ROE, the premium could compress. The peer comparison highlights that BANR's profitability is structurally lower, likely due to its conservative balance sheet and high liquidity.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The P/E ratio of 12.48x is distorted by volatile MSR valuations, which caused a $35.1M negative non-interest income swing in Q3 2025, as per income statement data.
For banks, P/E can be misleading because earnings are subject to provision volatility and MSR mark-to-market swings. BANR's Q3 2025 earnings were artificially depressed by MSR losses, making the trailing P/E appear higher than the underlying earnings power. Investors should use P/TBV and adjust for MSR volatility by focusing on pre-provision net revenue (PPNR) to assess true profitability. The P/B of 1.24x is a more stable valuation metric, but it still does not capture the impact of unrealized losses in the securities portfolio.