Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.8x · EV/EBITDA 8.2x · ROE 101.3%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $3.1B | $3.7B | $4.7B | $3.0B | $3.8B | $2.8B | $3.8B | $3.0B | $4.5B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.3B | $3.4B | $4.8B | $5.4B | $3.9B | $4.8B | $3.3B | $4.4B | $3.4B | $4.9B | $3.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.78 | 26.72 | — | 2557.52 | — | 658.17 | 359.75 | 318.40 | 67.63 | 68.47 | 72.73 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.69 | 2.72 | 3.23 | 4.21 | 2.87 | 4.11 | 3.07 | 4.27 | 3.56 | 5.73 | 4.14 |
| P/B Ratio | 24.01 | 36.08 | 26.32 | 5.76 | 4.08 | 5.31 | 6.58 | 9.69 | 8.09 | 14.71 | 12.23 |
| P/FCF | 7.42 | 11.91 | 12.95 | 34.37 | 22.85 | 23.59 | 36.83 | 30.99 | 20.28 | 32.77 | 27.64 |
| P/OCF | 7.20 | 11.56 | 12.63 | 23.33 | 14.89 | 17.83 | 18.94 | 21.07 | 15.01 | 25.61 | 19.71 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.04 | 4.14 | 4.93 | 3.69 | 5.13 | 3.63 | 4.86 | 3.98 | 6.24 | 4.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.20 | 12.38 | — | 48.89 | 105.37 | 62.42 | 33.74 | 47.50 | 27.60 | 38.06 | 25.72 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.91 | 17.17 | 26.50 | 48.61 | 116.86 | 147.55 | 77.39 | 128.15 | 47.31 | 71.37 | 47.96 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.30 | 16.56 | 40.19 | 29.42 | 29.49 | 43.56 | 35.26 | 22.67 | 35.74 | 30.61 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.8% | 58.8% | 55.3% | 54.6% | 52.2% | 52.2% | 53.2% | 53.7% | 55.1% | 54.1% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 16.9% | -23.4% | 4.0% | -2.7% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 3.0% | 7.0% | 8.6% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | -24.5% | 0.2% | -4.3% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 1.3% | 5.3% | 8.4% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 101.3% | 101.3% | -59.6% | 0.2% | -6.2% | 1.0% | 1.9% | 3.1% | 13.2% | 23.8% | 18.1% |
| ROA | 4.7% | 4.7% | -10.5% | 0.1% | -1.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 2.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 17.6% | 17.6% | -14.6% | 2.1% | -1.3% | 1.4% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 6.2% | 7.9% | 8.7% |
| ROCE | 15.6% | 15.6% | -18.3% | 2.6% | -1.6% | 1.7% | 3.7% | 3.0% | 7.5% | 9.6% | 10.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 13.16 | 13.16 | 7.81 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 1.41 | 1.29 | 1.42 | 1.04 | 1.43 | 1.38 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.04 | 4.04 | — | 7.36 | 24.38 | 13.23 | 5.58 | 6.11 | 3.16 | 3.39 | 2.63 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.23 | 7.34 | 0.98 | 1.17 | 1.33 | 1.20 | 1.34 | 0.95 | 1.33 | 1.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.30 | 1.30 | — | 7.08 | 23.52 | 12.51 | 5.22 | 5.76 | 2.91 | 3.16 | 2.50 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.40 | 3.61 | 5.82 | 6.57 | 5.91 | 6.74 | 4.28 | 2.39 | 2.97 | 2.97 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.94 | 2.94 | 3.24 | 2.81 | 0.93 | 1.79 | 2.48 | 1.66 | 4.49 | 5.70 | 6.61 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.96 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 26.47 | 26.39 | 33.75 | 35.55 | 40.80 | 38.26 | 36.24 | 38.00 | 45.01 | 44.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 77.2% | 198.2% | 52.0% | 35.0% | 54.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.6% | 3.7% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| FCF Yield | 13.5% | 8.4% | 7.7% | 2.9% | 4.4% | 4.2% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 4.9% | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 11.4% | 7.1% | 12.7% | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.4% | 7.1% | 12.7% | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.8% | 1.7% | 0.6% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $48M | $51M | $54M | $52M | $48M | $49M | $48M | $48M | $48M | $47M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLKB stock.
Blackbaud, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.8x. The historical average is 57.5x.
Blackbaud, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 27.2x.
Blackbaud, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 101.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 20.7%.
Based on historical data, Blackbaud, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Blackbaud, Inc. has 58.8% gross margin and 16.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Blackbaud, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent revenue contraction
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Masks Revenue Erosion
Gross margin improved 690 basis points to 61.3% in Q2 2026, per reported financials, yet revenue contracted 2.3% year-over-year, suggesting cost discipline rather than demand strength drives profitability.
The gross margin expansion from 54.4% in Q4 2024 to 61.3% in Q2 2026 likely reflects a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin subscriptions and away from lower-margin payment processing, but the concurrent revenue decline indicates that this is not a growth-driven improvement. Operating margin of 21.3% in Q2 2026, up from 7.5% in Q1 2025, appears to be the result of aggressive SG&A reduction rather than top-line leverage, as revenue has been flat to negative. Investors should monitor whether this margin expansion is sustainable or if it represents a one-time cost reset that could reverse if revenue continues to slide.
Leverage Distorts Return on Equity
ROE spiked to 69.6% in Q2 2026, per company filings, but this is largely a function of a depleted equity base of $67 million, not operational excellence, as ROIC remains a modest 3.9%.
The extreme ROE figure is misleading because equity has collapsed from $534 million in Q1 2024 to just $67 million by Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, making the denominator artificially small. ROIC, which better captures operating performance, has hovered between 0.5% and 5.6% over the past ten quarters, indicating that the company is not generating meaningful returns on its invested capital. The gap between ROE and ROIC suggests that financial leverage, not operational efficiency, is driving shareholder returns, which warrants caution as debt levels remain elevated.
Working Capital Efficiency Remains Opaque
Cash conversion cycle data is largely unavailable due to missing inventory figures, but DSO has ranged from 26 to 42 days over the past ten quarters, per reported data, indicating stable receivables collection.
The absence of DIO data limits a full assessment of the cash conversion cycle, but the stability in DSO suggests that Blackbaud's collections are consistent, with no significant deterioration in customer payment behavior. The wide swings in DPO, from 28 to 165 days, per financial statements, may reflect timing of payments to vendors and could indicate some flexibility in managing payables, though the volatility makes it difficult to discern a clear trend. Given the asset-light model with minimal capex, working capital efficiency appears less critical than revenue growth and margin stability, but the lack of complete data warrants monitoring.
Debt Burden Intensifies as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity surged to 17.16 in Q2 2026, per SEC filings, as total debt remained near $1.2 billion while equity shrank to $67 million, leaving interest coverage at a thin 3.64 times.
The leverage ratio is extreme, but it is more a reflection of the shrinking equity base than a massive increase in debt, as total debt has been relatively stable. Interest coverage of 3.64 times in Q2 2026, though improved from 1.33 in Q1 2025, remains modest and suggests that operating income provides only a limited cushion for debt service. The high cash balance of $758 million provides a buffer, but the persistent negative revenue growth and the need to refinance maturing debt could strain the balance sheet if cash generation falters.
Liquidity Cushion Thin Despite Cash Hoard
Current ratio has remained below 1.0 for ten consecutive quarters, at 0.83 in Q2 2026, per reported data, indicating that current liabilities exceed current assets, though a $758 million cash balance provides some offset.
The sub-1.0 current ratio suggests that Blackbaud may face short-term liquidity pressure if it cannot roll over its current obligations, but the large cash position and strong operating cash flow generation mitigate this risk. The quick ratio, which excludes inventory, is identical to the current ratio at 0.83, indicating that inventory is not a factor in this software business. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged downturn in charitable giving, the company's ability to service debt and fund operations would depend on its cash reserves and access to credit markets, which may be constrained given the high leverage.
ROE Misleads in Leveraged Buyout-Like Structure
The most misapplied ratio for Blackbaud is return on equity, which at 69.6% in Q2 2026, per reported figures, overstates true profitability because equity is artificially depressed by years of losses and buybacks.
ROE is commonly used to gauge management effectiveness, but for Blackbaud, the denominator is so small that the ratio becomes meaningless as a measure of operational performance. A more appropriate metric is ROIC, which at 3.9% in Q2 2026, per company filings, reflects the actual return on all invested capital, including debt. Investors should focus on ROIC and free cash flow yield, which at 7.81 times P/FCF suggests the market is pricing in a recovery, but the persistent revenue contraction and high leverage indicate that the risk of value destruction remains elevated.