Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.3x · EV/EBITDA 6.4x · ROE 4.1%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $561M | $753M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $959M | $1.1B | $760M | $819M | $1.5B | $2.1B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $973M | $1.2B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.2B | $2.6B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.34 | 38.13 | 24.07 | 10.90 | 55.08 | 107.27 | — | — | 39.09 | 9.21 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.78 | 1.04 | 1.62 | 1.88 | 1.47 | 1.84 | 1.39 | 1.35 | 2.29 | 3.30 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.31 | 1.59 | 2.28 | 2.63 | 2.49 | 2.88 | 2.23 | 0.72 | 0.93 | 1.23 | — |
| P/FCF | 3.81 | 5.11 | 7.81 | 11.17 | 8.82 | 9.66 | 6.23 | 10.20 | 10.16 | 13.51 | — |
| P/OCF | 3.70 | 4.97 | 7.66 | 9.47 | 7.46 | 8.32 | 5.48 | 8.07 | 9.27 | 11.13 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.61 | 2.19 | 2.52 | 2.14 | 2.53 | 2.33 | 2.39 | 3.30 | 4.19 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.40 | 7.66 | 9.79 | 11.21 | 8.72 | 10.48 | — | — | 11.63 | 11.78 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 16.15 | 12.23 | 16.72 | 34.40 | 24.18 | 32.67 | — | — | 25.80 | 19.56 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.91 | 10.52 | 15.01 | 12.87 | 13.26 | 10.47 | 18.05 | 14.62 | 17.15 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 83.0% | 82.7% | 82.3% | 82.4% | 81.7% | 81.5% | 83.6% | 86.1% | 89.5% | 79.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 7.9% | 10.1% | 7.8% | -162.1% | -73.5% | 12.7% | 21.4% | 27.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | 6.7% | 17.2% | 2.6% | 1.7% | -149.2% | -73.4% | 5.9% | 35.8% | 27.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.1% | 4.1% | 9.6% | 27.0% | 4.4% | 2.9% | -110.3% | -32.2% | 2.3% | 11.0% | 7.5% |
| ROA | 1.8% | 1.8% | 4.2% | 10.8% | 1.7% | 1.0% | -52.7% | -19.2% | 1.5% | 8.9% | 7.0% |
| ROIC | 5.0% | 5.0% | 4.3% | 4.6% | 6.0% | 4.3% | -50.7% | -16.5% | 2.8% | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 5.6% | 7.2% | 5.1% | -60.9% | -20.2% | 3.4% | 5.5% | 7.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 1.23 | 1.17 | 1.72 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.34 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.08 | 3.08 | 2.83 | 3.12 | 2.94 | 3.10 | — | — | 3.69 | 2.59 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 1.15 | 1.07 | 1.52 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 0.33 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.52 | 2.86 | 2.75 | 2.84 | — | — | 3.55 | 2.50 | -0.03 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.80 | 2.71 | 3.83 | 4.05 | 3.60 | 4.23 | 7.84 | 4.47 | 3.64 | -0.05 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.56 | 1.56 | 2.92 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 1.24 | -23.74 | -14.44 | 3.05 | 10.85 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.83 | 1.22 | 1.40 | 1.56 | 1.97 | 1.24 | 1.39 | 1.58 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.83 | 1.22 | 1.40 | 1.56 | 1.97 | 1.24 | 1.31 | 1.46 | 1.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.75 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.76 | 12.25 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.59 | 67.88 | 66.40 | 60.25 | 57.88 | 62.43 | 61.22 | 60.04 | 58.78 | 56.67 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.4% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 289.6% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 2.6% | 4.2% | 9.2% | 1.8% | 0.9% | — | — | 2.6% | 10.9% | — |
| FCF Yield | 26.3% | 19.6% | 12.8% | 9.0% | 11.3% | 10.4% | 16.0% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 7.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 15.5% | 11.5% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 15.5% | 11.5% | 4.2% | 2.4% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.9% | 6.4% | 31.4% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $62M | $67M | $68M | $70M | $71M | $67M | $67M | $71M | $72M | $72M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CARS stock.
Cars.com Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.3x. The historical average is 40.5x. This places it at the 43th percentile of its historical range.
Cars.com Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.2x.
Cars.com Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.1%. The historical average is -3.5%.
Based on historical data, Cars.com Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.3x. This is at the 43th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Cars.com Inc. has 83.0% gross margin and 8.3% operating margin.
Cars.com Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
Gross margin averaged 83% over the last year, but operating margin swung from 3.6% to 15.5%, reflecting cost discipline and one-time items, as per reported financials.
The 83% gross margin underscores the low marginal cost of digital listings, yet the operating margin's volatility—from 3.6% in 2025Q1 to 15.5% in 2026Q2—suggests that SG&A and marketing expenses are not fully under control. The 2026Q2 operating margin expansion to 15.5% from 8.5% a year earlier indicates improved cost discipline, but the net margin of 7.9% in the same quarter is still thin, leaving limited cushion for any revenue shortfall. Investors should monitor whether the margin improvement is sustainable or driven by non-recurring cost reductions.
Return on Capital Remains Subdued
ROIC averaged 1.4% over the last year, with a peak of 2.5% in 2026Q2, indicating that the company is generating minimal returns on its invested capital, based on reported figures.
Despite a stable asset base, ROIC has hovered between 0.5% and 2.5% over the past ten quarters, reflecting the combination of thin net margins and a relatively high invested capital base, largely from intangible assets. The slight uptick in 2026Q2 to 2.5% suggests early signs of improvement, but the absolute level remains far below the cost of capital, implying that the company is not yet compounding shareholder value. This may indicate that the heavy investment in sales and marketing and the acquisition of Dealer Inspire have not yet translated into efficient capital deployment.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
DSO has risen from 63 to 70 days over the past year, while DPO has been volatile, leading to an incomplete cash conversion cycle, as per recent financial statements.
The increase in DSO from 63 days in 2024Q1 to 70 days in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is taking longer to collect receivables, which could indicate looser credit terms or a shift in revenue mix. DPO has been erratic, swinging from -103 days to 777 days, which distorts the cash conversion cycle and makes it difficult to assess true working capital efficiency. The lack of DIO data further complicates the analysis, but the overall trend suggests that working capital management is not a source of competitive advantage, and the company may be relying on supplier financing to manage cash flow.
Leverage Creeps Higher Amid Flat Debt
Debt-to-equity rose from 0.89 to 1.01 over the past six quarters, while interest coverage improved to 3.64 in 2026Q2, indicating manageable but rising leverage, based on reported balance sheet data.
Total debt has remained near $450M, but equity has contracted due to buybacks and losses, pushing D/E above 1.0. Interest coverage of 3.64 in 2026Q2 is an improvement from the 0.21 in 2026Q1, but the low absolute level suggests that a modest decline in operating income could strain debt service. The D/EBITDA ratio of 6.38 in 2026Q2 is elevated, indicating that the company's debt load is high relative to its cash earnings, and any prolonged downturn in the automotive market could increase refinancing risk.
Liquidity Buffer Thin Despite Current Ratio
Current ratio improved to 2.00 in 2026Q2, but cash of $33.3M is only about 7% of total debt, leaving a thin buffer against shocks, as per the latest balance sheet.
The current ratio of 2.00 suggests adequate short-term liquidity, but the composition is concerning: cash and equivalents are minimal relative to the $450M debt load. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, but the reliance on receivables and other current assets may not be as liquid as cash. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp drop in dealer spending, the company could face difficulty meeting its obligations without accessing capital markets, which may be costly given its leverage.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on True Leverage
EV/EBITDA of 7.26 appears reasonable, but it obscures the high D/EBITDA of 6.38 and thin net margin, suggesting the market may be underappreciating the risk, based on reported figures.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.26 is below peers like CarGurus at 15.95, which may suggest a value opportunity, but this metric fails to capture the company's high debt load relative to EBITDA. With D/EBITDA at 6.38, the company is highly leveraged, and the low net margin of 2.8% in 2026Q1 means that even a small EBITDA decline could wipe out net income. Investors should focus on free cash flow yield and interest coverage rather than EV/EBITDA, as the latter can be distorted by non-cash charges and does not reflect the true cash flow available to service debt.