Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 25.3x · EV/EBITDA 17.7x · ROE 10.1%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $606M | $642M | $634M | $256M | $201M | $162M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.8B | $779M | $176M | $353M | $-120154980 | $293M | $105M | $69M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 25.31 | 37.69 | 26.13 | 13.58 | 15.79 | 23.44 | 16.94 | 15.25 | 16.74 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.77 | 2.68 | 2.04 | 1.38 | 2.77 | 6.01 | 3.61 | 3.53 | 3.65 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.42 | 3.61 | 2.69 | 2.05 | 2.64 | 3.15 | 1.83 | 1.62 | 1.48 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 4.77 | 7.19 | 4.71 | 3.27 | 9.99 | 23.26 | 18.36 | 16.12 | 12.19 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.61 | 6.95 | 4.54 | 3.16 | 9.57 | 21.24 | 13.26 | 14.69 | 11.22 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.71 | 1.35 | 0.40 | 1.52 | -1.14 | 4.13 | 1.85 | 1.57 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.67 | 26.48 | 12.59 | 2.97 | 6.73 | -3.34 | 14.29 | 5.88 | 5.21 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 19.55 | 29.30 | 13.59 | 3.09 | 6.97 | -3.50 | 15.30 | 6.32 | 5.66 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.29 | 3.12 | 0.95 | 5.49 | -4.41 | 20.98 | 8.45 | 5.23 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 52.8% | 30.4% | 37.4% | 57.2% | 87.1% | 80.3% | 84.0% | 87.0% | 89.7% | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.9% | 13.0% | 21.8% | 32.6% | 27.0% | 29.3% | 27.7% | 27.8% | 22.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.1% | 7.1% | 7.8% | 10.1% | 17.5% | 25.6% | 21.4% | 23.2% | 21.9% | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.1% | 10.1% | 12.3% | 16.6% | 18.3% | 15.8% | 11.5% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 8.8% | 8.8% | 10.2% | 13.3% | 13.6% | 8.6% | 5.8% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 7.4% |
| ROCE | 2.3% | 2.3% | 13.3% | 17.2% | 17.6% | 14.9% | 10.9% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 10.4% | 2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 1.42 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.48 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 1.65 | 9.74 | 1.80 | 2.52 | 3.03 | 3.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.05 | -0.91 | -1.46 | -1.19 | -3.75 | 0.26 | -0.77 | -0.84 | -0.86 | -0.98 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.35 | -6.45 | -7.22 | -5.52 | -20.96 | 1.78 | -5.34 | -6.93 | -5.07 | -7.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.10 | -1.60 | -2.32 | -4.50 | -27.66 | 2.61 | -7.67 | -6.96 | -8.57 | -9.42 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.62 | 2.48 | 9.43 | 3.39 | 2.53 | 3.12 | 3.51 | 2.96 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 728.91 | 728.91 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 728.91 | 728.91 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 6.87 | 6.87 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.0% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 7.4% | 6.3% | 4.3% | 5.9% | 6.6% | 6.0% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 21.0% | 13.9% | 21.2% | 30.6% | 10.0% | 4.3% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 8.2% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $15M | $14M | $14M | $14M | $13M | $12M | $12M | $11M | $11M | $11M |
Regulatory BaaS Oversight Exposure
According to recent market data, CCB trades at a P/B of 2.43, significantly exceeding the 1.0x-1.2x range observed among regional peers like HFWA and COLB, suggesting investors are pricing the bank as a high-growth technology platform rather than a traditional depository institution with limited return on equity.
The elevated P/B multiple implies that the market expects significant future earnings growth from the CCBX division to justify the current valuation. However, given the modest ROE levels, this premium appears fragile and highly sensitive to any regulatory or operational setbacks that could force a re-rating toward traditional banking multiples.
As reported in financial statements, the bank's ROE has remained constrained between 2.2% and 4.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the high fee-income contribution from the CCBX division is currently insufficient to offset the overhead costs required to maintain the bank's complex regulatory infrastructure.
The decomposition of profitability suggests that while the bank successfully generates non-interest income, the efficiency ratio volatility—peaking at 46.9%—dampens the overall return on equity. Investors should monitor whether the bank can achieve operating leverage as it scales, or if the compliance-heavy model inherently limits long-term profitability.
Based on reported figures, the efficiency ratio has deteriorated from 19.5% in 2024Q1 to 46.9% in 2026Q1, reflecting the mounting operational costs associated with managing the CCBX division's rapid growth and the increasing complexity of third-party risk oversight in a tightening regulatory environment.
The compression of the net interest margin to 1.5% in 2026Q1, combined with rising efficiency ratios, suggests that the bank is struggling to maintain spread profitability. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the bank is sacrificing margin to retain fintech partners or if rising compliance costs are structurally impairing the bottom line.
As indicated by the latest quarterly filings, the equity-to-assets ratio has compressed to 0.09 in 2026Q1, down from 0.11 in 2024Q4, which suggests that the bank's capital base is being stretched thin by the aggressive asset growth driven by its national fintech partner program.
The decline in the equity-to-assets ratio indicates that the bank is operating with increasingly narrow capital buffers, which may limit its capacity for future growth or capital return. This trend suggests that management may eventually need to prioritize capital preservation over aggressive expansion to maintain regulatory standing.
Investors frequently misapply the P/E ratio to CCB, failing to account for the extreme volatility in loan loss provisions and non-cash items that distort earnings, which obscures the underlying health of the core banking franchise and the sustainability of the fee-based revenue model.
The P/E ratio is a poor metric for this bank because it ignores the capital-intensive nature of the BaaS model and the impact of regulatory compliance costs on net income. Analysts should instead focus on P/TBV and the trend in non-interest income as a percentage of total revenue to better assess the bank's true franchise value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CCB stock.
Coastal Financial Corporation's current P/E ratio is 25.3x. The historical average is 20.7x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
Coastal Financial Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 17.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.6x.
Coastal Financial Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.1%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, Coastal Financial Corporation is trading at a P/E of 25.3x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Coastal Financial Corporation has 52.8% gross margin and 9.3% operating margin.
Coastal Financial Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.