Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.2x · EV/EBITDA 48.5x · ROE 4.6%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.5B | $1.6B | $732M | $901M | $1.0B | $987M | $776M | $855M | $774M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.3B | $2.4B | $1.5B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $2.2B | $1.9B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.23 | 30.46 | — | 25.03 | 12.14 | 10.77 | 13.59 | 15.72 | 34.75 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 9.18 | 5.79 | 4.07 | 3.86 | 3.51 | 3.62 | 3.07 | 4.19 | 4.17 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.15 | 1.36 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.80 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 42.66 | 26.90 | 28.30 | 27.25 | 7.74 | 10.59 | 17.47 | 344.95 | 17.87 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 36.52 | 23.03 | 21.98 | 22.14 | 7.34 | 10.00 | 15.82 | 39.20 | 13.68 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.89 | 8.47 | 8.60 | 6.70 | 4.75 | 4.56 | 10.72 | 10.34 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 48.51 | 35.11 | — | 33.27 | 15.29 | 9.39 | 13.30 | 28.75 | 51.35 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 55.53 | 40.20 | — | 43.58 | 17.04 | 10.25 | 15.11 | 30.77 | 57.08 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.29 | 58.88 | 60.66 | 14.76 | 13.88 | 25.94 | 881.84 | 44.35 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 50.3% | 36.5% | 54.1% | 85.8% | 91.2% | 71.9% | 68.4% | 72.5% | 74.9% | 76.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | -3.5% | 10.9% | 34.4% | 40.8% | 23.4% | 24.3% | 13.6% | 23.4% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | -2.6% | 8.5% | 25.3% | 29.8% | 17.7% | 18.7% | 9.2% | 15.5% | 17.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.6% | 4.6% | -1.1% | 3.4% | 8.1% | 8.8% | 5.8% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 6.8% | 7.5% |
| ROA | 0.5% | 0.5% | -0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | 2.0% | -0.5% | 1.5% | 4.8% | 5.8% | 2.7% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 2.8% | 3.3% |
| ROCE | 1.4% | 1.4% | -0.6% | 1.8% | 6.3% | 7.6% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 2.0% | 4.0% | 5.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.47 | 1.07 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 1.43 | 1.22 | 1.97 | 1.55 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 17.19 | 17.19 | — | 25.34 | 8.65 | 2.74 | 9.23 | 18.50 | 31.79 | 18.38 | 12.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 1.83 | 1.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 12.24 | 12.24 | — | 18.33 | 7.28 | 2.22 | 4.35 | 17.50 | 30.66 | 17.08 | 12.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.39 | 30.58 | 33.42 | 7.02 | 3.29 | 8.47 | 536.89 | 26.48 | 29.26 | 11.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.26 | 0.26 | -0.06 | 0.24 | 2.72 | 3.41 | 1.03 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 1.07 | 1.14 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 3.3% | — | 4.0% | 8.2% | 9.3% | 7.4% | 6.4% | 2.9% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.3% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.7% | 12.9% | 9.4% | 5.7% | 0.3% | 5.6% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 9.4% | 11.0% | 14.0% | 6.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 9.4% | 11.0% | 14.0% | 6.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $223M | $224M | $226M | $234M | $229M | $241M | $244M | $245M | $255M | $255M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLBK stock.
Columbia Financial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 48.2x. The historical average is 20.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Columbia Financial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 48.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 26.6x.
Columbia Financial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.6%. The historical average is 5.3%.
Based on historical data, Columbia Financial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 48.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Columbia Financial, Inc. has 50.3% gross margin and 11.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Columbia Financial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 17.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Deposit competition and margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced on Conversion Optionality
CLBK trades at 2.27x tangible book, a substantial premium to peers like OCFC at 0.66x, reflecting market expectations for a second-step conversion, as per reported market data.
The P/B of 2.27x is far above the peer group, where KRNY trades at 0.82x and NFBK at 0.89x. This premium appears to embed a conversion option, but it also implies the market expects a significant improvement in ROTCE, which currently stands at a low single-digit level. Investors should monitor whether the bank can deliver the earnings growth needed to justify this multiple, or if the premium is solely dependent on a future conversion event.
ROE Subdued by Thin Spreads
ROE averaged 1.1% over the last four quarters, with NIM at 0.5%, indicating that the bank's core spread is insufficient to generate adequate returns on equity, based on quarterly financials.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the bank's profitability is constrained by a very low net interest margin, which at 0.5% is far below the levels needed to support a healthy ROE. The efficiency ratio, though improving to 35.9% in 2026Q1, cannot compensate for the thin spread. The 2026Q2 provision spike of $59.3M further eroded earnings, suggesting that credit costs are a growing drag on profitability. Without a meaningful expansion in NIM, ROE is likely to remain subdued.
NIM Stuck at 0.5% Amid Deposit Wars
Net interest margin has remained at 0.5% for five consecutive quarters, while the efficiency ratio improved to 35.9% in 2026Q1, indicating cost control but persistent spread compression, as per reported data.
The stability of NIM at 0.5% masks the underlying pressure from rising deposit costs in the NY/NJ market. The bank's heavy reliance on CDs and money market accounts suggests that interest expense is rising, but asset yields are not repricing fast enough to offset this. The efficiency ratio's improvement to 35.9% in 2026Q1 from 43.9% in 2026Q2 shows good cost discipline, but this may not be sustainable if the bank needs to invest in technology or branches to remain competitive. Investors should watch for any NIM deterioration as deposit competition intensifies.
Thin Capital Base Limits Flexibility
Equity-to-assets ratio has held at 0.10-0.11 over the past year, with no dividends paid, suggesting capital is being retained but remains thin relative to the balance sheet, according to financial statements.
The equity-to-assets ratio of approximately 10% is low for a regional bank, and the absence of dividends indicates that all earnings are being retained to support growth and regulatory requirements. The MHC structure allows for this conservative approach, but it also means that the bank has limited capacity to absorb unexpected losses or return capital to shareholders. The 2026Q2 provision spike highlights the need for a stronger capital buffer, and investors should monitor whether CET1 ratios remain above regulatory minimums.
Provision Spike Raises Credit Concerns
Loan loss provisions surged to $59.3M in 2026Q2 from $956K in 2026Q1, a 62x increase, signaling potential deterioration in the multi-family and CRE portfolio, based on reported quarterly data.
The dramatic increase in provisions suggests that credit quality is weakening, possibly due to stress in the New Jersey multi-family sector or broader economic concerns. The bank's heavy concentration in multi-family and CRE loans makes it vulnerable to localized downturns. While the provision may be a one-time event, it warrants close monitoring of NPL ratios and charge-offs in coming quarters. If the provision reflects a systemic issue, the bank may need to build additional reserves, which would further pressure earnings.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The trailing P/E of 50.86x is distorted by volatile provisions and one-time items, obscuring the bank's true earnings power; adjusted earnings suggest a more reasonable multiple, as per reported figures.
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to banks because earnings can be heavily influenced by provision expenses and non-recurring items. For CLBK, the 2026Q2 provision spike and the volatile fee income make the trailing P/E unreliable. A more appropriate metric is P/TBV, which at 2.27x still appears rich, but it better reflects the bank's underlying asset value. Investors should also consider the impact of AOCI unrealized losses on tangible book value, which may be understated in the reported figures. Using a normalized earnings figure would provide a clearer picture of the bank's valuation.