Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 27.6x · EV/EBITDA 17.4x · ROE 8.7%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $77.6B | $67.5B | $67.6B | $73.8B | $69.6B | $49.1B | $47.2B | $35.5B | $25.5B | $26.7B | $21.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $93.9B | $90.5B | $89.9B | $96.2B | $89.1B | $69.4B | $57.1B | $44.5B | $34.1B | $34.6B | $30.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 27.62 | 16.33 | 18.18 | 18.78 | 19.79 | 17.21 | 19.31 | 14.57 | 13.06 | 11.11 | 13.40 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.26 | 4.48 | 4.65 | 5.88 | 7.89 | 6.14 | 6.12 | 4.56 | 3.48 | 4.08 | 3.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.44 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.74 | 1.79 | 1.45 | 6.44 | 5.02 | 3.84 | 4.15 | 4.64 |
| P/FCF | 50.49 | 31.13 | 28.11 | 45.07 | 26.92 | 22.78 | 41.69 | 26.44 | 21.92 | 31.75 | 23.69 |
| P/OCF | 20.63 | 12.72 | 12.84 | 17.84 | 16.80 | 13.32 | 16.83 | 11.88 | 9.38 | 12.25 | 10.28 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.00 | 6.18 | 7.66 | 10.10 | 8.69 | 7.40 | 5.71 | 4.66 | 5.27 | 4.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.37 | 11.87 | 12.70 | 16.22 | 21.29 | 17.29 | 13.96 | 11.62 | 9.66 | 10.87 | 9.83 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.62 | 14.24 | 16.13 | — | 18.56 | 17.11 | 15.60 | 12.36 | 11.20 | 11.62 | 11.43 |
| EV / FCF | — | 41.74 | 37.36 | 58.73 | 34.45 | 32.21 | 50.47 | 33.13 | 29.36 | 41.04 | 33.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | 52.2% | 51.9% | 51.3% | 52.1% | 57.4% | 57.5% | 55.7% | 55.2% | 54.5% | 53.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 37.2% | 35.6% | 35.0% | 37.8% | 40.1% | 42.9% | 40.1% | 38.7% | 38.4% | 38.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 27.5% | 27.5% | 25.6% | 31.3% | 39.9% | 35.7% | 31.7% | 31.3% | 26.7% | 36.7% | 25.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.1% | 9.7% | 9.7% | 13.9% | 34.0% | 35.6% | 29.8% | 43.5% | 33.9% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 5.0% | 6.2% | 10.5% | 11.1% | 9.4% | 12.1% | 8.2% |
| ROIC | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 6.7% | 14.9% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 13.8% | 13.7% |
| ROCE | 6.9% | 6.9% | 6.6% | 6.0% | 4.9% | 7.4% | 16.0% | 15.7% | 15.0% | 13.8% | 13.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 1.38 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.27 | 1.88 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 3.04 | 3.25 | 3.85 | 4.76 | 5.08 | 2.47 | 2.38 | 2.47 | 2.57 | 2.85 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 1.36 | 1.27 | 1.30 | 1.22 | 1.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.02 | 3.02 | 3.14 | 3.77 | 4.66 | 5.06 | 2.43 | 2.34 | 2.45 | 2.46 | 2.79 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 10.61 | 9.25 | 13.66 | 7.53 | 9.43 | 8.78 | 6.69 | 7.44 | 9.29 | 9.39 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.26 | 7.26 | 6.96 | -2.96 | 7.36 | 9.23 | 7.99 | 7.93 | 6.72 | 6.29 | 5.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | 14.37 | 14.37 | 15.32 | 15.28 | 14.86 | 14.50 | 15.76 | 18.95 | 18.97 | 19.60 | 15.75 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 49.12 | 49.38 | 54.86 | 42.07 | 37.39 | 39.06 | 37.71 | 40.66 | 38.26 | 34.61 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.2% | 19.2% | 19.1% | 18.0% | 20.1% | 17.8% | 19.1% | 16.9% | 17.8% | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.6% | 6.1% | 5.5% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 5.8% | 5.2% | 6.9% | 7.7% | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| FCF Yield | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 2.2% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 4.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.6% | 5.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 1.4% | 5.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 7.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 5.7% | 2.6% | 6.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $917M | $935M | $934M | $933M | $683M | $680M | $697M | $717M | $732M | $753M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CP stock.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 27.6x. The historical average is 15.2x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.7%. The historical average is 17.0%.
Based on historical data, Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 27.6x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 0.70% with a payout ratio of 19.2%.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. has 52.2% gross margin and 37.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Integration and leverage risks
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple with Integration Discount
CP trades at 27.97x trailing P/E versus peers' 23-33x, but forward P/E of 17.25x implies market expects earnings normalization post-merger, per recent filings.
The trailing P/E is elevated relative to CNI and UNP, but the forward multiple compresses sharply, suggesting the market is pricing in a recovery in earnings power as integration costs fade. EV/EBITDA of 17.55x is above the peer average of ~16.9x, yet the forward EV/EBITDA of 12.82x indicates a significant expected improvement in EBITDA. This gap implies the market is not fully discounting the merger's potential synergies, but also reflects execution risk. The PEG of 5.99 is high, indicating that the current growth rate is not sufficient to justify the multiple, unless the merger delivers substantial cost savings.
Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
Operating margin swung from 34-41% in 2025 to 14.7% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, but gross margin of 80.2% suggests underlying pricing power remains intact.
The dramatic drop in operating margin in 2026Q2 appears tied to acquisition-related costs, as SG&A surged to 26% of revenue, a level not seen in prior quarters. Excluding this distortion, the operating margin in the prior four quarters averaged around 37%, which is consistent with the peer group's 33-41% range. Net margin of 10.6% in 2026Q2 is well below the 22-33% range of the prior year, indicating that the merger is currently dilutive to profitability. Investors should monitor whether these costs are transitory or represent a permanent shift in the cost structure.
ROIC Suppressed by Acquisition Base
ROIC has hovered between 1.3% and 2.0% over the last ten quarters, per reported figures, far below peers' 9.8-15.2%, reflecting the enlarged asset base from the merger.
The low ROIC is a direct consequence of the massive capital deployed in the Kansas City Southern acquisition, which has not yet generated proportional returns. While ROE of 2.2% in 2026Q2 is also depressed, it is consistent with the company's historical range, indicating that the return on equity is being diluted by the increased equity base. The improvement in ROIC from 1.3% in 2024Q1 to 1.5% in 2026Q2 is marginal, suggesting that integration synergies are slow to materialize. If the company can achieve the projected cost savings, ROIC should trend upward, but the current data does not yet show a clear inflection.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle improved to -86 days in 2026Q2 from -12 days in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, driven by a sharp increase in days payable outstanding to 133.
The negative CCC indicates that CP is effectively using supplier financing to fund its operations, a common feature in the railroad industry due to the high proportion of payables. DPO of 133 days in 2026Q2 is significantly higher than the 81-90 days seen in early 2024, suggesting that the company is stretching its payment terms, possibly to conserve cash during the integration. Asset turnover remains low at 0.11, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business, but this is typical for railroads. The improvement in CCC is a positive sign, but investors should verify that the extended payables do not strain supplier relationships.
Debt Load Elevated but Manageable
D/E rose to 0.53 in 2026Q2 from 0.47 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage of 6.51x remains above the 5x threshold, per reported figures, indicating adequate debt service capacity.
The increase in leverage is consistent with the debt-funded acquisition, and D/EBITDA of 12.98x is high relative to the 9-13x range seen in the prior year, reflecting the current EBITDA compression. However, interest coverage of 6.51x is still comfortable, and the company's cash flow generation has been sufficient to cover interest expenses. The prior cash flow analysis noted that buybacks exceeded FCF in 2026Q2, which could increase reliance on debt if sustained. Investors should monitor whether the company can deleverage through retained earnings and EBITDA growth, as the current D/EBITDA is above the typical investment-grade threshold.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Raises Concern
Current ratio of 0.59 and quick ratio of 0.50 in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, indicate a tight liquidity position, though negative CCC suggests operational cash flows are strong.
The current ratio has been below 1 for the entire period, which is typical for railroads due to their low current assets relative to current liabilities. However, the quick ratio of 0.50 is particularly low, indicating that the company relies heavily on inventory and other non-cash current assets to meet short-term obligations. The negative CCC of -86 days implies that CP receives cash from customers before paying suppliers, which mitigates the need for a large cash buffer. Nevertheless, the cash balance of $366M is modest relative to the $25.1B in total debt, and any disruption in cash conversion could strain liquidity. The company's access to credit markets appears adequate, but the thin buffer warrants monitoring.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Integration
EV/EBITDA is commonly used to value railroads, but for CP, the metric is distorted by merger-related costs and the enlarged asset base, per reported figures, obscuring true operating performance.
The trailing EV/EBITDA of 17.55x is misleading because EBITDA in the recent quarters includes significant acquisition-related expenses and non-recurring items, which depress the denominator and inflate the multiple. A more appropriate measure would be to adjust EBITDA for integration costs and use a normalized EBITDA figure, or to focus on forward EV/EBITDA, which the market is already doing at 12.82x. Additionally, the company's high capital intensity means that EV/EBITDA does not capture the full cost of maintaining the network, so investors should also consider EV/EBITDAR or EV/IC. For CP, the most commonly misapplied ratio is EV/EBITDA, as it fails to account for the substantial capital expenditures required to sustain the business and the temporary earnings drag from the merger.