Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 43.8x · EV/EBITDA 13.0x · ROE 8.8%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $164M | $205M | $157M | $126M | $44M | $101M | $121M | $66M | $29M | $29M | $19M |
| Enterprise Value | $134M | $174M | $141M | $118M | $43M | $97M | $105M | $62M | $27M | $28M | $20M |
| P/E Ratio → | 43.78 | 40.44 | 93.56 | — | — | — | 15.07 | 60.71 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.85 | 3.00 | 2.58 | 2.37 | 1.16 | 3.61 | 7.37 | 4.58 | 2.41 | 2.80 | 2.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.51 | 3.21 | 3.05 | 2.82 | 1.05 | 1.54 | 4.69 | 15.07 | 14.33 | 21.71 | 37.35 |
| P/FCF | 13.67 | 22.06 | 25.09 | 17.48 | — | — | — | 42.23 | 64.41 | 98.87 | — |
| P/OCF | 17.68 | 22.02 | 24.98 | 35.96 | — | — | 186.59 | 40.37 | 63.42 | 98.87 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.56 | 2.32 | 2.21 | 1.13 | 3.44 | 6.42 | 4.30 | 2.27 | 2.69 | 2.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.99 | 21.85 | 27.34 | 62.46 | — | — | 84.21 | 50.54 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 28.59 | 32.37 | 72.98 | — | — | — | 53.25 | 53.69 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.80 | 22.52 | 16.35 | — | — | — | 39.67 | 60.71 | 94.78 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 62.9% | 62.0% | 59.5% | 63.6% | 62.1% | 69.8% | 69.9% | 67.9% | 66.7% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 3.0% | -3.2% | -99.6% | -10.0% | 6.0% | 7.9% | -1.7% | -8.0% | -30.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.4% | 7.4% | 2.8% | -0.7% | -94.3% | -8.7% | 48.5% | 7.9% | -1.9% | -9.8% | -30.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.8% | 8.8% | 3.5% | -0.8% | -66.0% | -5.3% | 52.7% | 35.7% | -13.4% | -110.0% | -205.4% |
| ROA | 7.1% | 7.1% | 2.8% | -0.6% | -53.3% | -4.5% | 41.3% | 18.5% | -5.6% | -29.2% | -60.7% |
| ROIC | 10.2% | 10.2% | 3.8% | -3.3% | -55.2% | -5.9% | 14.0% | 234.8% | -63.4% | -116.3% | -156.0% |
| ROCE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.7% | -3.7% | -66.9% | -5.9% | 6.0% | 30.5% | -10.5% | -56.5% | -112.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 2.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.41 | 1.16 | — | — | 1.62 | 0.14 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.47 | -0.31 | -0.18 | -0.03 | -0.07 | -0.60 | -0.91 | -0.82 | -0.90 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.79 | -3.79 | -3.12 | -4.33 | — | — | -12.45 | -3.27 | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.26 | -2.57 | -1.13 | — | — | — | -2.56 | -3.71 | -4.09 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 283.68 | 283.68 | 45.98 | -1.30 | -462.78 | -33.64 | 25.99 | 96.42 | -16.33 | -3.41 | -19.14 |
Net cash position: cash ($31M) exceeds total debt ($1M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.40 | 3.40 | 2.22 | 1.65 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 7.72 | 1.99 | 1.66 | 1.23 | 1.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.36 | 3.36 | 2.19 | 1.61 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 7.52 | 1.85 | 1.52 | 1.17 | 0.94 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.55 | 2.55 | 1.50 | 1.01 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 6.86 | 1.45 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 1.85 | 2.62 | 3.01 | 2.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 55.65 | 55.65 | 58.77 | 56.45 | 20.15 | 46.15 | 9.82 | 11.39 | 14.14 | 26.39 | 21.32 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 0.1% | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 2.5% | 1.1% | — | — | — | 6.6% | 1.6% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 7.3% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 5.7% | — | — | — | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.0% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $32M | $30M | $26M | $23M | $20M | $17M | $16M | $14M | $14M | $13M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CXDO stock.
Crexendo, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 43.8x. The historical average is 52.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Crexendo, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 49.3x.
Crexendo, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.8%. The historical average is -0.1%.
Based on historical data, Crexendo, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 43.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Crexendo, Inc. has 62.9% gross margin and 6.9% operating margin.
Crexendo, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin earnings base and volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trailing Premium Versus Forward Earnings Recovery
According to reported figures, CXDO trades at 31.69 trailing P/E but 11.88 forward P/E, a gap implying analysts expect earnings to roughly more than double, though this remains an expectation rather than a realized outcome.
The wide spread between trailing and forward P/E suggests the market is pricing in an earnings recovery from a currently thin base of roughly 1.4% ROE. Because the company is not a regulated utility with an authorized return, the usual bond-proxy anchoring does not apply, so valuation rests on earnings durability. Investors should monitor whether quarterly net margins of 4.4% can be sustained before accepting the forward multiple at face value.
Conservative Capital Structure With Strong Coverage
Based on reported figures, CXDO's debt-to-capital ratio sits near 0.06 in 2026Q3 with interest coverage of 13.36, indicating minimal reliance on borrowed funds relative to its equity base.
A debt-to-capital ratio this low implies the balance sheet carries little financial risk, and interest coverage well above 10x reflects ample operating earnings relative to financing costs. The result is consistent with the low-leverage structure noted in the balance sheet findings. The low leverage may partly reflect underutilized capital rather than deliberate strength, given the modest return generated on equity.
Thin Operating Margins Limit Earnings Conversion
As reported in the income statements, operating margin improved to 4.3% in 2026Q3 from 0.9% in 2024Q3, yet remains below the 7.5% peak reached in 2025Q3, suggesting cost discipline has not yet produced a stable margin trend.
Operating margin has oscillated between roughly 1% and 7.5% over ten quarters, which points to volatile cost absorption rather than a steadily scaling operating model. Revenue growth has outpaced margin recovery, indicating incremental revenue is not yet dropping through to operating profit at a consistent rate. Investors should treat the current margin level as provisional until several consecutive quarters confirm a durable trend.
Low Returns on a Recovering Equity Base
Based on reported figures, CXDO's ROE of 1.4% in 2026Q3 compares with a peak of 2.4% in 2025Q3, indicating the equity base is generating only modest returns despite a growing asset base.
The ROE trajectory suggests returns have not kept pace with the expansion in total assets, which rose substantially over the period. With a price-to-book ratio near 2.3, the market is valuing the company well above its book equity, implying that investors expect future returns to rise considerably. Until ROE moves meaningfully higher, the premium to book value depends heavily on the forward earnings recovery thesis.
Trailing P/E Misread as Expensive Utility Multiple
Applying a utility-style P/E framework to CXDO obscures that its earnings are volatile and near-breakeven, so the 31.69 trailing multiple reflects a depressed denominator rather than a stable premium valuation.
The most commonly misapplied ratio here is trailing P/E, since a company with ROE near 1% produces a multiple that is highly sensitive to small changes in net income. A more informative approach would be to evaluate EV/EBITDA of 16.79 alongside revenue growth and margin trajectory, which reduces distortion from a thin and fluctuating earnings base. Investors should also weigh the forward P/E only after assessing whether the earnings consensus behind it is realistic given recent margin volatility.