Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2623.5x · EV/EBITDA 41.9x · ROE 0.5%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.5B | $17.1B | $17.9B | $16.3B | $5.0B | $11.1B | $14.2B | $2.0B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $10.9B | $17.4B | $18.5B | $16.4B | $5.0B | $10.2B | $12.5B | $2.0B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2623.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.74 | 2.82 | 3.76 | 4.45 | 2.22 | 8.53 | 23.15 | 6.11 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 16.69 | 27.06 | 17.74 | 19.41 | 3.76 | 6.59 | 5.41 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 16.28 | 26.39 | 43.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 15.90 | 25.78 | 42.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.88 | 3.88 | 4.47 | 2.23 | 7.89 | 20.33 | 6.10 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.87 | 67.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 623.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.90 | 45.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 41.3% | 38.1% | 37.5% | 33.8% | 38.7% | 43.6% | 67.9% | 78.5% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | -0.3% | -12.8% | -21.5% | -67.5% | -120.5% | -137.2% | -45.3% | -33.9% | -38.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -10.6% | -21.9% | -61.5% | -117.5% | -200.5% | -44.1% | -33.7% | -39.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | -54.8% | -74.2% | -91.8% | -70.7% | -95.4% | — | — | -11732.3% |
| ROA | 0.1% | 0.1% | -12.3% | -20.1% | -34.0% | -40.6% | -65.3% | -45.3% | -31.6% | -41.3% |
| ROIC | -0.9% | -0.9% | -36.9% | -52.5% | -103.9% | -134.6% | -149.7% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -0.6% | -0.6% | -24.2% | -30.4% | -51.0% | -51.8% | -57.0% | -163.6% | -122.8% | -339.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.06 | 3.06 | 1.32 | 1.60 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.03 | — | — | 7.76 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.45 | 7.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.50 | -0.66 | — | — | -68.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.27 | 1.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.51 | 1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.40 | 1.40 | -199.46 | -294.35 | -543.31 | -718.60 | -788.09 | — | — | -47.50 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 1.34 | 1.67 | 2.96 | 3.96 | 1.02 | 1.34 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 1.34 | 1.67 | 2.96 | 3.96 | 1.02 | 1.34 | 1.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.82 | 1.05 | 2.32 | 3.28 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.34 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 0.55 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 1.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 6.36 | 9.22 | 34.78 | 34.40 | 27.55 | 44.41 | 33.68 | 34.41 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.1% | 3.8% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 7.9% | 4.9% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 2.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.9% | 4.9% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 2.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $496M | $482M | $463M | $437M | $402M | $306M | $185M | $185M | $185M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DKNG stock.
DraftKings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2623.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
DraftKings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 41.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 67.1x.
DraftKings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is -64.4%.
Based on historical data, DraftKings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2623.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
DraftKings Inc. has 41.3% gross margin and -0.3% operating margin.
DraftKings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory and leverage overhang
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Seasonal Swings Mask Margin Inflection
DraftKings' gross margin averaged 39.4% over the last ten quarters, capped by state taxes and promotional costs, while operating margin swung from -27.3% to +10.0%, per reported financials.
The Q4 2025 operating margin of 7.6% marked a clear inflection from the -27.3% in Q4 2024, but Q2 2026 reverted to -4.7%, underscoring the volatility inherent in a sports-calendar-driven model. Gross margin has remained range-bound between 31.5% and 46.0%, suggesting that structural costs—state gaming taxes and promotional spend—limit upside regardless of scale. Investors should focus on the trajectory of promotional intensity and iGaming mix, as these are the primary levers for sustainable margin expansion beyond the seasonal peaks.
Returns on Capital Remain Elusive
ROIC swung from -13.3% in Q3 2025 to +9.6% in Q4 2025, but Q2 2026 sits at -3.4%, reflecting the difficulty of generating consistent returns above the cost of capital, per reported data.
The extreme quarterly swings in ROIC—driven by the sports calendar and promotional timing—make it difficult to assess the underlying trend, but the ten-quarter average is clearly negative. The asset-light model means capital efficiency should improve as revenue scales, yet the persistent negative returns suggest that the heavy upfront investment in user acquisition has not yet translated into durable profitability. The Q4 2025 positive ROIC of 9.6% offers a glimpse of the potential, but the Q2 2026 relapse indicates that the business is still in the investment phase, and investors should monitor whether peak-season profitability becomes the norm rather than the exception.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves with Scale
DSO improved from 26 days in Q1 2024 to 5 days by Q2 2026, while DPO rose to 71 days, indicating stronger customer collections and supplier leverage, as per financial statements.
The dramatic reduction in DSO—from 26 days in early 2024 to just 5 days in Q2 2026—reflects the shift toward digital payments and the company's growing scale, which likely improves collection terms. DPO has also increased to 71 days, suggesting DraftKings is stretching payables to suppliers, a common practice in asset-light models. However, the cash conversion cycle remains negative or near zero due to the absence of inventory, which is typical for a digital services business. This efficiency gain is a positive sign, but it is partly a function of the business model rather than operational excellence, and investors should watch whether these metrics stabilize as the company matures.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity climbed from 1.04 in Q2 2024 to 3.36 by Q2 2026, while shareholders' equity fell to $569.4M, per reported figures, signaling a progressively leveraged balance sheet.
The rising debt-to-equity ratio is driven by both an increase in total debt—from $1.3B to $1.9B—and a shrinking equity base, as cumulative losses have eroded retained earnings to -$6.5B. Interest coverage was positive only in Q2 2025 and Q1 2026, and the D/EBITDA ratio spiked to 157.46 in Q2 2026, reflecting the thin EBITDA base. While the $983.9M cash position provides a buffer, the trend is concerning: the company is increasingly reliant on debt to fund operations and buybacks, which may constrain flexibility if regulatory or competitive pressures intensify. Investors should monitor whether the path to sustained EBITDA profitability materializes before leverage becomes a more serious constraint.
Liquidity Cushion Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio held near 1.0 over the past year, with cash at $983.9M in Q2 2026, down from $1.6B in Q4 2025, per reported figures, indicating a shrinking but still adequate short-term cushion.
The current ratio has hovered around 1.0, which is typical for a company with minimal inventory and significant deferred revenue, but the decline in cash from $1.6B to $983.9M over two quarters warrants attention. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, confirming that inventory is not a factor, but the reliance on short-term debt and payables could become strained if cash flows deteriorate. The $1.1B spent on buybacks over the last ten quarters, including $381.9M in Q4 2025, suggests management is prioritizing shareholder returns over building a larger liquidity buffer. Under a severe stress scenario—such as a prolonged downturn in consumer spending or a regulatory tax hike—the current liquidity position may be sufficient, but the trend is toward a thinner margin of safety.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in a Promo-Driven Model
EV/EBITDA of 51.21 appears extreme, but the metric is distorted by promotional spending and stock-based compensation, which are expensed upfront while benefits accrue over time, per reported figures.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for DraftKings is EV/EBITDA, because EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation and treats promotional spend as a period cost, yet these are core to the business model. The forward EV/EBITDA of 3.09 suggests the market expects a dramatic EBITDA expansion, but this may be overly optimistic if promotional intensity remains high. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Revenue or EV/Adjusted EBITDA, where 'adjusted' excludes SBC and normalizes for promotional timing. Investors should also consider the ratio of promotional spend to revenue, as this reveals whether growth is being 'bought' rather than earned organically. The current valuation multiples imply a winner-take-most scenario, but the thin margins and high leverage suggest that the market may be pricing in a level of profitability that has yet to be demonstrated consistently.