Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.6x · EV/EBITDA 14.9x · ROE 27.2%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.3B | $6.9B | $7.3B | $5.2B | $5.7B | $5.0B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $1.8B | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.5B | $7.2B | $7.5B | $5.3B | $5.9B | $5.2B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $1.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.62 | 27.56 | 36.68 | 28.05 | 39.87 | 43.21 | 32.75 | 35.62 | 32.88 | 43.11 | 28.03 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.53 | 3.30 | 3.97 | 3.18 | 4.06 | 4.42 | 3.07 | 2.43 | 2.09 | 2.78 | 2.54 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.20 | 7.56 | 7.84 | 5.83 | 7.56 | 7.15 | 4.09 | 3.60 | 2.98 | 3.54 | 3.28 |
| P/FCF | 17.71 | 23.13 | 32.81 | 32.75 | 47.26 | 33.69 | 18.30 | 18.80 | 35.44 | 27.22 | 23.43 |
| P/OCF | 15.06 | 19.66 | 27.16 | 24.56 | 34.51 | 26.88 | 14.50 | 14.32 | 19.93 | 18.76 | 17.39 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.43 | 4.08 | 3.26 | 4.19 | 4.60 | 3.18 | 2.64 | 2.29 | 2.75 | 2.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.85 | 19.19 | 22.01 | 17.20 | 21.93 | 22.32 | 16.25 | 16.81 | 20.56 | 18.74 | 15.87 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.65 | 21.50 | 26.71 | 21.18 | 29.86 | 33.50 | 24.11 | 27.11 | 29.98 | 24.08 | 18.45 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.99 | 33.73 | 33.58 | 48.83 | 35.09 | 18.98 | 20.44 | 38.97 | 26.84 | 21.13 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.4% | 38.4% | 37.6% | 37.3% | 36.5% | 38.4% | 34.9% | 33.9% | 33.8% | 35.0% | 34.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 15.0% | 14.3% | 14.6% | 13.6% | 13.9% | 11.5% | 7.7% | 5.6% | 9.5% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.0% | 12.0% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 10.1% | 10.2% | 9.3% | 6.8% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 9.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 27.2% | 27.2% | 21.8% | 22.4% | 19.7% | 16.3% | 12.9% | 10.5% | 9.3% | 8.6% | 12.4% |
| ROA | 15.1% | 15.1% | 13.0% | 13.2% | 10.9% | 9.1% | 7.4% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 9.1% |
| ROIC | 20.4% | 20.4% | 18.4% | 18.2% | 15.6% | 13.5% | 9.7% | 6.8% | 5.4% | 11.7% | 14.0% |
| ROCE | 23.2% | 23.2% | 21.6% | 21.9% | 20.7% | 17.2% | 11.1% | 8.2% | 6.3% | 11.5% | 11.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 1.50 | 1.76 | 2.14 | 2.89 | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.30 | -0.05 | -0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.58 | 1.35 | 1.86 | -0.26 | -1.73 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.57 | 1.40 | 0.67 | 1.64 | 3.53 | -0.37 | -2.30 |
| Interest Coverage | 18.89 | 18.89 | 14.57 | 19.05 | 24.04 | 20.38 | 11.31 | 7.10 | 9.35 | 46.02 | 63.46 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.73 | 2.07 | 2.20 | 1.16 | 2.74 | 2.35 | 3.22 | 3.14 | 3.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.73 | 2.07 | 2.20 | 1.16 | 2.74 | 2.35 | 3.22 | 3.14 | 3.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 0.65 | 1.84 | 1.43 | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.86 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.23 | 1.14 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 68.46 | 71.44 | 73.74 | 71.30 | 69.75 | 62.94 | 68.44 | 73.94 | 68.61 | 66.48 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.4% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 2.3% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 2.3% | 3.6% |
| FCF Yield | 5.6% | 4.3% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 3.0% | 5.5% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 4.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.2% | 4.8% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 1.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.2% | 4.8% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 2.7% | 1.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $162M | $164M | $168M | $169M | $171M | $173M | $174M | $175M | $176M | $173M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EXLS stock.
ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 22.6x. The historical average is 24.0x. This places it at the 40th percentile of its historical range.
ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.6x.
ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 27.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 15.1%.
Based on historical data, ExlService Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 22.6x. This is at the 40th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ExlService Holdings, Inc. has 38.4% gross margin and 15.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Wage inflation in India
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Analytics Pivot
EXLS trades at 21.9x trailing earnings versus EPAM's 16.4x and Cognizant's 12.3x, reflecting a premium for its analytics mix. Forward P/E of 14.7x implies market confidence in sustained double-digit growth, per recent filings.
The forward P/E of 14.74x is only modestly above the sector median, suggesting the market is pricing in continued earnings acceleration but not an aggressive premium. With a PEG of 0.90, the stock appears undervalued relative to its growth rate, which may indicate the market is still discounting the durability of the analytics-led transformation. Investors should monitor whether the premium compresses if growth decelerates or if margin expansion stalls.
Margin Expansion on Mix Shift
Gross margin improved to 38.0% in Q2 2026 from 37.1% in Q2 2024, while operating margin rose to 14.7% from 13.7%, as per financial statements. This suggests a favorable shift toward higher-value analytics and platform services.
The steady gross margin expansion, despite wage inflation in India, indicates that pricing power and mix shift are offsetting cost pressures. Operating margin of 14.7% in Q2 2026 is near the high end of the trailing range, reflecting disciplined overhead control. However, the recent dip in operating margin from 16.1% in Q1 2026 to 14.7% in Q2 2026 warrants monitoring, as it may signal increased investment in AI capabilities or temporary cost pressures.
ROIC Creeping Higher on Efficiency
ROIC improved to 5.5% in Q2 2026 from 4.1% in Q2 2024, per reported figures, indicating gradual improvement in capital efficiency. However, ROE remains modest at 7.8%, reflecting a conservative balance sheet.
The upward trend in ROIC, from 4.1% to 5.5% over two years, suggests that management is deploying capital into higher-return projects, likely in analytics and platform development. The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which has remained stable around 0.30-0.35. Despite the progress, ROIC remains below the cost of capital for many tech peers, implying that the company is still in the early stages of generating excess returns on invested capital.
Working Capital Efficiency Steady
DSO improved to 66 days in Q2 2026 from 72 days in Q2 2024, as per financial statements, indicating better receivables management. However, DPO remains minimal at 2 days, suggesting limited supplier leverage.
The reduction in DSO by six days over two years reflects improved collections, likely due to a shift toward more predictable contract terms. However, the extremely low DPO of 2 days indicates that EXLS pays suppliers almost immediately, which is unusual for a services firm and may reflect a lack of negotiating power or a business model with minimal payables. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the low DPO suggests that working capital is primarily tied up in receivables, which could be a source of cash flow volatility.
Leverage Creep Amidst Growth
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.56 in Q2 2026 from 0.44 in Q4 2025, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage remains strong at 17.6x. This indicates increasing but manageable leverage.
The rise in D/E to 0.56, driven by total debt increasing to $488M, suggests that management is using debt to fund growth and capital returns, likely including buybacks. Despite the increase, interest coverage of 17.6x remains comfortable, indicating that debt service is not a near-term concern. However, the trend warrants monitoring, as continued leverage creep could strain the balance sheet if earnings growth falters or interest rates rise further.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Seasonally
Current ratio dropped to 1.24 in Q2 2026 from 2.66 in Q1 2026, per reported figures, as cash fell to $126.7M. This suggests a thinner short-term buffer, though still above 1.0.
The sharp decline in the current ratio is likely due to seasonal working capital swings, as seen in prior years, with Q1 typically showing strong cash balances and Q2 depleting them. The quick ratio of 1.24 indicates that EXLS can cover current liabilities without relying on inventory, which is minimal in this business. However, the thin buffer could be a concern if a major client delayed payments or if unexpected expenses arose, though the company's strong cash flow generation provides a mitigating factor.
Misapplied P/E on Reimbursable Revenue
The P/E ratio is often misapplied to EXLS because reimbursable expenses inflate revenue without contributing to profit, distorting earnings-based multiples. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which better capture underlying economics.
EXLS's revenue includes pass-through reimbursable expenses, which can inflate the P/S ratio and make the company appear more expensive than it is. Similarly, P/E can be distorted by stock-based compensation and one-time items. EV/EBITDA of 14.4x and P/FCF of 17.1x provide a cleaner picture of valuation, as they exclude non-operating items and focus on cash generation. Given the asset-light model and high SBC, investors should adjust for SBC when comparing P/E to peers, as it represents a real economic cost.