Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -54.4%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $228M | $327M | $615M | $505M | $629M | $2.2B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $840M | $660M | $605M |
| Enterprise Value | $453M | $552M | $765M | $707M | $897M | $2.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $795M | $619M | $691M |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.14 | — | — | — | 21.31 | 18.92 | 22.33 | 36.31 | 20.57 | 15.00 | 16.40 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.85 | 1.22 | 1.32 | 1.07 | 1.24 | 4.40 | 3.30 | 3.66 | 2.67 | 2.34 | 2.49 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 10.91 | 7.14 | — | 18.98 | 12.60 | 27.55 | 33.56 | 24.14 | 25.49 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 6.47 | 4.37 | 121.27 | 12.93 | 9.46 | 16.07 | 14.40 | 10.82 | 10.49 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 1.06 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 10.71 | 8.50 | 9.84 | 25.65 | 11.00 | 15.70 | 10.82 | 7.77 | 9.14 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 67.09 | — | 24.39 | 63.60 | 15.47 | 25.76 | 19.09 | 10.02 | 11.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 13.57 | 10.00 | — | 19.81 | 11.86 | 25.88 | 31.76 | 22.64 | 29.12 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 38.7% | 40.1% | 37.5% | 37.2% | 37.2% | 41.8% | 42.1% | 42.5% | 43.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.6% | -3.6% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -11.9% | -11.9% | -0.3% | -2.2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 4.0% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -54.4% | -54.4% | -1.3% | -9.1% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 15.9% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 16.8% | 16.3% |
| ROA | -21.0% | -21.0% | -0.6% | -4.0% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 8.3% | 5.8% | 7.1% | 8.2% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | -8.2% | -8.2% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 4.6% | 6.8% | 20.5% | 12.6% | 12.0% | 12.2% | 10.1% |
| ROCE | -8.4% | -8.4% | 2.0% | 3.3% | 4.9% | 5.7% | 14.5% | 9.6% | 9.2% | 11.1% | 11.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 4.33 | 3.96 | 3.28 | 2.97 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 1.39 | 1.36 | 1.51 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.84 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.19 | -0.19 | -0.22 | -0.14 | -0.15 | 0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.10 | 2.43 | 2.94 | 1.07 | -0.69 | -1.01 | -0.61 | -0.52 | 1.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 2.66 | 2.87 | — | 0.82 | -0.74 | -1.67 | -1.79 | -1.50 | 3.63 |
| Interest Coverage | -12.82 | -12.82 | 1.07 | -2.99 | 6.49 | 6.27 | 32.93 | 16.52 | 11.47 | 10.62 | 8.71 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.31 | 1.50 | 2.10 | 2.38 | 2.19 | 2.06 | 1.38 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.38 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.45 | 0.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 1.33 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 1.20 | 0.23 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.06 | 1.69 | 1.82 | 1.92 | 1.98 | 1.86 | 2.03 | 1.99 | 2.12 | 2.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.83 | 5.83 | 6.21 | 6.59 | 5.60 | 9.01 | 8.87 | 7.82 | 7.46 | 8.88 | 6.34 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 4.70 | 3.59 | 3.69 | 3.94 | 3.44 | 3.72 | 3.62 | 4.10 | 4.30 | 5.95 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 4.7% | 5.3% | 4.5% | 2.8% | 4.9% | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 9.2% | 14.0% | — | 5.3% | 7.9% | 3.6% | 3.0% | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.5% | 3.1% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 6.1% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 2.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.5% | 3.1% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 6.1% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 2.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $64M | $65M | $65M | $66M | $67M | $66M | $66M | $67M | $68M | $67M |
Liquidity and Solvency Pressure
According to current market data, FLWS trades at a P/S ratio of 0.13, a valuation level that suggests investors are heavily discounting the firm's future earnings potential due to the persistent negative net margins and the ongoing contraction of the company's core consumer discretionary revenue base.
The negative TTM P/E ratio underscores the absence of current profitability, rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics ineffective for assessing the firm's intrinsic value. Investors should monitor whether the forward EV/EBITDA multiple of 39.41 represents a realistic recovery path or merely an optimistic projection that fails to account for the structural challenges in the company's cost base.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has deteriorated significantly, falling to -9.9% in 2026Q3 from a positive 11.9% in 2026Q2, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its existing asset base and operational investments.
The sharp decline in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is failing to generate adequate returns, likely exacerbated by the high fixed costs associated with its vertically integrated fulfillment infrastructure. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the firm's recent capital expenditures are yielding any tangible improvements in operational efficiency or if they are merely sustaining a business model that is no longer aligned with current market demand.
As reported in financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, reaching 38 days in 2026Q3 compared to 111 days in 2026Q1, highlighting the extreme difficulty management faces in balancing inventory levels against the highly seasonal and perishable nature of the company's product offerings.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle suggests that the firm's working capital management is highly reactive to seasonal shifts rather than being optimized for consistent efficiency. Investors should monitor the DSO and DIO trends, as any inability to manage these metrics effectively during non-peak periods could further strain the company's already limited liquidity position.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's quick ratio has declined to 0.49 in 2026Q3, a level that indicates a significant reliance on inventory liquidation to meet short-term obligations, which poses a substantial risk given the perishable nature of the firm's primary floral and gourmet food inventory.
The current liquidity profile appears increasingly vulnerable, as the quick ratio's downward trend suggests that the company's ability to cover immediate liabilities without relying on inventory sales is diminishing. This situation warrants close scrutiny, as any disruption in the seasonal sales cycle could leave the firm with insufficient cash to manage its debt service requirements.
The market frequently misapplies standard retail P/S multiples to FLWS, which obscures the underlying value of the BloomNet service segment and fails to account for the high-margin, recurring nature of the platform-based revenue that is currently masked by the company's capital-intensive gourmet food and floral operations.
Investors should instead focus on segment-level profitability and the growth of the 'Celebrations Passport' membership base, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the firm's potential for long-term value creation. Relying on a blended revenue multiple ignores the structural differences between the company's service-oriented wire business and its commodity-sensitive retail segments, leading to a potentially flawed assessment of the firm's true earning power.
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FLWS stock.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.1x. The historical average is 32.3x.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -54.4%. The historical average is -0.1%.
Based on historical data, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. has 38.7% gross margin and -3.6% operating margin.