Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.4x · EV/EBITDA 8.2x · ROE 13.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.3B | $4.1B | $3.9B | $3.4B | $2.9B | $2.7B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $4.3B | $4.2B | $3.4B | $1.4B | $492M | $1.4B | $3.6B | $3.1B | $4.1B | $3.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.44 | 10.04 | 9.61 | 8.21 | 9.57 | 10.60 | 14.29 | 13.80 | 10.62 | 16.82 | 20.20 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.12 | 4.93 | 4.72 | 4.06 | 4.26 | 4.53 | 4.44 | 4.81 | 3.96 | 5.03 | 5.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.32 | 1.27 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.34 | 1.18 | 1.44 | 1.57 |
| P/FCF | 9.09 | 8.75 | 8.56 | 7.56 | 7.79 | 9.57 | 8.01 | 10.03 | 11.00 | 14.53 | 16.46 |
| P/OCF | 8.75 | 8.42 | 8.30 | 7.12 | 7.41 | 9.23 | 7.83 | 9.08 | 9.97 | 13.47 | 13.31 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.13 | 5.08 | 4.05 | 2.02 | 0.83 | 2.59 | 6.07 | 5.31 | 7.78 | 7.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.21 | 7.92 | 7.98 | 6.19 | 3.37 | 1.42 | 5.80 | 12.39 | 10.29 | 16.58 | 17.29 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.58 | 8.27 | 8.33 | 6.45 | 3.56 | 1.53 | 6.58 | 13.73 | 11.27 | 18.48 | 19.47 |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.10 | 9.21 | 7.56 | 3.70 | 1.75 | 4.67 | 12.66 | 14.73 | 22.44 | 23.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.3% | 78.3% | 76.9% | 82.3% | 91.6% | 94.4% | 85.4% | 88.0% | 90.7% | 91.1% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 49.4% | 49.4% | 48.8% | 54.0% | 53.7% | 52.0% | 36.7% | 40.2% | 43.2% | 39.2% | 35.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 39.1% | 39.1% | 39.2% | 42.4% | 42.1% | 40.9% | 29.0% | 31.7% | 34.2% | 27.8% | 24.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 15.6% | 18.3% | 13.8% | 11.3% | 7.8% | 10.1% | 11.4% | 8.8% | 7.9% |
| ROA | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 10.5% | 10.5% | 11.7% | 13.7% | 9.7% | 7.4% | 5.0% | 6.3% | 6.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| ROCE | 5.4% | 5.4% | 17.5% | 20.4% | 14.2% | 11.0% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 7.4% | 7.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.23 | 1.19 | 1.43 | 2.91 | 4.16 | 3.46 | 3.67 | 6.92 | 6.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.05 | 0.11 | -0.00 | -0.74 | -0.95 | -0.46 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.57 | -0.00 | -3.74 | -6.33 | -4.16 | 2.57 | 2.61 | 5.85 | 5.09 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.36 | 0.66 | -0.00 | -4.10 | -7.82 | -3.34 | 2.63 | 3.74 | 7.91 | 6.87 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.43 | 2.43 | 2.43 | 3.83 | 10.03 | 12.01 | 5.41 | 4.43 | 5.18 | 5.69 | 4.57 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.49 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 21.1% | 21.1% | 20.1% | 19.0% | 25.1% | 28.7% | 41.8% | 33.5% | 23.0% | 27.7% | 29.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.6% | 10.0% | 10.4% | 12.2% | 10.4% | 9.4% | 7.0% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| FCF Yield | 11.0% | 11.4% | 11.7% | 13.2% | 12.8% | 10.5% | 12.5% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 4.4% | 2.7% | 5.0% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $62M | $62M | $62M | $63M | $63M | $64M | $66M | $67M | $67M | $66M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IBOC stock.
International Bancshares Corporation's current P/E ratio is 10.4x. The historical average is 12.7x. This places it at the 23th percentile of its historical range.
International Bancshares Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 8.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
International Bancshares Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 13.6%. The historical average is 13.4%.
Based on historical data, International Bancshares Corporation is trading at a P/E of 10.4x. This is at the 23th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
International Bancshares Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.02% with a payout ratio of 21.1%.
International Bancshares Corporation has 78.3% gross margin and 49.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
International Bancshares Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Deposit beta and border risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced for Fortress Stability
IBOC trades at 1.41x tangible book, a premium to peers like SBSI (1.18x) but below FFIN (2.64x), implying the market rewards its fortress balance sheet yet discounts growth, per recent trading data.
The P/B of 1.41x is consistent with a bank that generates a 2.9% quarterly ROE, translating to roughly 11.6% annualized, which supports a premium to book but not the multiples seen at higher-growth franchises. The low PEG of 0.54 suggests the market is not pricing in significant earnings growth, aligning with the flat revenue trend. Investors appear to value IBOC for its stability and capital strength rather than expansion potential, as evidenced by the modest premium to tangible book relative to its historical range.
ROE Decomposition Reveals Asset Sensitivity
IBOC's ROE has declined from 4.2% in 2024Q4 to 2.9% in 2026Q2, driven by a stable NIM of 1.0% and rising equity, as per quarterly data, indicating leverage is the primary drag.
DuPont analysis shows that the bank's ROE is heavily influenced by its equity multiplier, which has increased as equity/assets rose from 0.16 to 0.20 over the period. The NIM has remained flat at 1.0%, suggesting that asset yields and funding costs are moving in tandem, but the higher capital base is diluting returns. Fee income as a percentage of revenue has improved to 16.6%, providing some offset, but the core profitability is constrained by the conservative balance sheet. This suggests that unless IBOC deploys its excess capital into higher-yielding assets or returns it to shareholders, ROE will remain subdued.
NIM Stability Masks Deposit Beta Risk
Net interest margin has held at 1.0% for five consecutive quarters, while the efficiency ratio improved to 31.3% in 2026Q2, indicating disciplined cost control, according to reported quarterly figures.
The flat NIM suggests that the bank's asset-sensitive positioning has been offset by rising deposit costs, but the low efficiency ratio indicates that operating expenses are well managed. However, the recent spike in provisions to $11.1M in 2026Q2, up from $3.0M, could signal credit deterioration that may pressure future margins. The efficiency ratio improvement from 27.4% in 2024Q1 to 31.3% in 2026Q2 is notable, but investors should monitor whether this is sustainable as the bank invests in digital capabilities. The stable NIM, combined with a rising efficiency ratio, suggests that the bank is facing margin pressure that is being partially mitigated by cost controls.
Fortress Capital, Minimal Leverage
IBOC's equity/assets ratio improved to 0.20 in 2026Q2, up from 0.16 in 2024Q1, and debt-to-equity is a mere 0.22%, reflecting a fortress balance sheet, as per reported figures.
The bank's capital position is exceptionally strong, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.22% indicating virtually no reliance on borrowed funds. This conservative approach provides ample capacity for capital return, but the high cash balance of $536M and low leverage suggest that management may be forgoing growth opportunities. The equity/assets ratio of 0.20 is well above the regulatory minimum, and the bank's CET1 ratio, while not disclosed, is likely robust given the low risk profile. However, the lack of loan growth and the shift toward investment securities may indicate that the bank is struggling to deploy its capital productively, which could lead to 'capital laziness' and suboptimal returns.
Provision Spike Warrants Monitoring
Loan loss provisions jumped to $11.1M in 2026Q2, up from $3.0M in the prior quarter, suggesting potential credit deterioration, as reported in the latest earnings.
The sharp increase in provisions is a red flag, especially given the bank's concentration in the Laredo trade corridor and Texas real estate. While the absolute level is manageable relative to the loan portfolio, the trend warrants close attention. The bank's allowance for credit losses may need to be increased if the provision spike reflects a broader deterioration in credit quality. Investors should monitor the NPL ratio and charge-off trends in the coming quarters to assess whether this is a one-time event or the beginning of a cycle. The bank's historical discipline suggests it may be building reserves proactively, but the lack of detail in the data limits certainty.
P/E Misleads on Provision Volatility
IBOC's P/E of 11.08x appears cheap, but it is distorted by provision volatility and the bank's fortress capital, obscuring the true earnings power, according to standard banking analysis.
For banks, P/E is often misleading because provisions can cause earnings to swing without reflecting underlying cash flow. IBOC's low P/E may be a result of the market discounting potential credit losses, but the bank's strong capital and stable deposit base suggest that earnings quality is high. A better metric is P/TBV, which at 1.41x reflects the market's valuation of the tangible book value. Additionally, ROE should be adjusted for the excess capital, as the high equity base depresses returns. Investors should focus on ROTCE, which would be higher if the bank returned capital to shareholders. The market may be overestimating the risk of border disruption, leading to an undervaluation of the franchise.