Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 28.9x · EV/EBITDA 20.6x · ROE 21.5%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $81.8B | $90.8B | $71.9B | $52.5B | $36.1B | $33.4B | $49.1B | $30.8B | $38.4B | $23.8B | $27.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $89.4B | $98.4B | $82.7B | $61.4B | $44.1B | $40.3B | $55.5B | $36.7B | $42.8B | $34.5B | $40.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 28.92 | 31.76 | 41.81 | 30.80 | 19.78 | 22.47 | 29.99 | 48.63 | 80.95 | 15.09 | 23.56 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.19 | 3.54 | 3.05 | 2.29 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 2.07 | 1.38 | 1.60 | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.05 | 6.66 | 5.55 | 3.02 | 2.04 | 1.92 | 2.62 | 1.66 | 1.84 | 1.06 | 1.27 |
| P/FCF | 22.43 | 27.45 | 74.53 | 32.71 | 20.35 | 22.24 | 25.37 | 17.33 | 62.29 | 12.70 | — |
| P/OCF | 21.67 | 24.07 | 51.41 | 25.01 | 16.27 | 16.79 | 19.74 | 13.87 | 31.92 | 9.45 | 273.57 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.83 | 3.51 | 2.67 | 1.98 | 1.96 | 2.34 | 1.64 | 1.78 | 1.47 | 1.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.56 | 22.64 | 22.40 | 18.95 | 13.87 | 14.79 | 15.36 | 14.23 | 18.86 | 12.55 | 9.97 |
| EV / EBIT | 24.20 | 28.73 | 36.16 | 30.92 | 32.49 | 30.27 | 18.30 | 29.18 | 31.47 | 17.02 | 13.13 |
| EV / FCF | — | 29.74 | 85.73 | 38.25 | 24.86 | 26.85 | 28.68 | 20.64 | 69.43 | 18.44 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | 37.1% | 36.4% | 35.2% | 35.0% | 34.4% | 34.0% | 33.2% | 32.1% | 32.8% | 30.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 14.4% | 12.0% | 10.5% | 10.9% | 9.7% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 6.0% | 8.2% | 10.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 13.9% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 7.4% | 6.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 9.2% | 5.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.5% | 21.5% | 21.7% | 9.7% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 8.8% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 9.8% | 6.9% |
| ROA | 7.3% | 7.3% | 8.2% | 4.0% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 2.8% |
| ROIC | 12.3% | 12.3% | 8.5% | 7.0% | 7.3% | 6.1% | 8.4% | 5.3% | 3.7% | 4.2% | 6.5% |
| ROCE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 9.8% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 6.3% | 8.5% | 5.3% | 4.1% | 5.0% | 7.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.63 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.89 | 1.89 | 3.03 | 2.93 | 2.77 | 3.28 | 2.14 | 3.04 | 3.18 | 3.98 | 3.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.75 | 1.75 | 2.93 | 2.75 | 2.51 | 2.54 | 1.77 | 2.28 | 1.94 | 3.91 | 3.25 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.29 | 11.20 | 5.54 | 4.50 | 4.61 | 3.31 | 3.30 | 7.14 | 5.74 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 14.57 | 4.29 | 5.54 | 3.96 | 7.25 | 3.56 | 4.49 | 4.21 | 5.79 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 1.37 | 1.05 | 1.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.17 | 0.89 | 0.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.08 | 8.08 | 8.24 | 8.38 | 7.75 | 5.08 | 7.59 | 8.40 | 8.97 | 8.64 | 6.50 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 104.04 | 96.97 | 96.23 | 89.80 | 101.29 | 86.56 | 86.58 | 87.87 | 87.69 | 80.64 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 4.0% | 2.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 34.2% | 34.2% | 29.7% | 58.7% | 53.0% | 59.8% | 46.5% | 125.2% | 194.1% | 44.1% | 43.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.5% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 3.2% | 5.1% | 4.4% | 3.3% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 6.6% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 4.5% | 3.6% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 5.8% | 1.6% | 7.9% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.7% | 8.3% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 4.3% | 2.7% | 7.2% | 15.6% | 1.3% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.0% | 2.7% | 9.7% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 7.1% | 4.2% | 9.7% | 18.0% | 5.3% | 4.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $611M | $654M | $676M | $679M | $679M | $721M | $754M | $874M | $679M | $679M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JCI stock.
Johnson Controls International plc's current P/E ratio is 28.9x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 74th percentile of its historical range.
Johnson Controls International plc's current EV/EBITDA is 20.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.5x.
Johnson Controls International plc's return on equity (ROE) is 21.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 12.1%.
Based on historical data, Johnson Controls International plc is trading at a P/E of 28.9x. This is at the 74th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Johnson Controls International plc's current dividend yield is 1.18% with a payout ratio of 34.2%.
Johnson Controls International plc has 37.1% gross margin and 14.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Johnson Controls International plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.9x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill concentration exceeding equity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple on Modest Returns
Traded at 59.3x TTM earnings and 28.5x EV/EBITDA, JCI commands a premium to Honeywell's 14.9x and 11.5x multiples, per current market data, yet its 3.6% ROIC suggests investors are paying materially more for returns than the operating assets currently generate.
The 30.68x forward P/E and 22.46x forward EV/EBITDA sit well above Honeywell's 14.86x and 11.49x and roughly in line with Trane's 24.76x, implying the market is underwriting continued double-digit organic growth rather than a reversion toward the 2.8% reported trailing revenue rate. A 2.31 PEG versus Trane's 1.19 and Eaton's 1.50 indicates investors are paying a disproportionate premium for each unit of expected growth, so any deceleration in the order book would appear to leave the multiple exposed. The 97.85x P/FCF should be treated cautiously because the previously identified quarterly working capital swings distort any single-period free cash flow figure.
Returns Climb But Remain Sub-Scale
ROIC improved from 1.5% in 2025Q1 to 3.6% in 2026Q4, as reported in JCI's quarterly ratio data, yet remains far below Trane's 26.2% and Honeywell's 12.6%, indicating recent margin expansion has not yet translated into commensurate returns on invested capital.
ROE of 7.1% in 2026Q4 versus ROIC of 3.6% shows the equity return is being flattered by financial leverage and, in certain quarters, non-operating income rather than by operating asset productivity, so ROE is the less trustworthy measure of compounding here. Decomposition points to asset turnover as the primary driver, rising from 0.13 to 0.18 over ten quarters while net margin improved more unevenly, which suggests the return gains are coming from volume on a largely fixed asset base. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can clear high single digits, as the goodwill-heavy balance sheet means a substantial portion of invested capital may never earn an adequate spread.
Payables Stretch Anchors Cash Cycle
JCI's cash conversion cycle shortened to 47 days in 2026Q4 from 75 days in 2024Q3, according to quarterly ratio disclosures, driven mainly by DPO extending to 87 days and inventory days falling to 41, which may signal supplier financing rather than structural productivity.
DSO has remained stubbornly elevated at 92-103 days across the window, implying customer payment terms or milestone billing on large installations give JCI limited leverage over receivables, so the CCC improvement rests almost entirely on the payable and inventory legs. That configuration is typically less durable than a DSO-driven improvement, and any normalization in supplier terms or a rebuild of inventory ahead of the low-GWP refrigerant transition could reverse roughly a third of the cycle gain. The rise in asset turnover from 0.14 to 0.18 alongside shrinking total assets suggests the efficiency gain is partly a function of divestiture-driven denominator shrinkage rather than pure operating throughput.
Deleveraging Rebuilds Debt Service Headroom
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.60 in 2026Q4 from 0.76 in 2025Q4 while D/EBITDA dropped to 6.79x from 13.88x in 2025Q1, based on JCI's reported balance sheet ratios, suggesting leverage is receding even as interest coverage recovered to 13.92x by 2026Q3.
The decline from roughly $10.4B to $8.2B of total debt alongside EBITDA growth appears to reflect genuine debt reduction rather than multiple inflation, and at 0.60 JCI now carries materially less leverage than Honeywell's 2.24, which should leave refinancing flexibility comparatively comfortable. However, with goodwill of $16.6B exceeding the $13.6B equity base, a debt-to-tangible-equity presentation would look considerably more stretched than the headline D/E implies, so the apparent safety of the ratio depends on the intangibles remaining undimpaired. Interest coverage was unavailable for 2026Q4, and the trend from the 6.73x recorded in 2024Q4 to 13.92x suggests debt service has become notably more comfortable, though investors should verify this against maturity schedules not captured in the data provided.
Sub-Unit Current Ratio Tightens Flexibility
The current ratio fell to 0.77 in 2026Q4 from 1.04 two quarters earlier while the quick ratio slipped to 0.61, per JCI's quarterly filings, leaving the company materially thinner than the 1.20-1.32 range maintained by Honeywell, Trane, and Carrier.
Part of the shortfall appears attributable to deferred revenue of roughly $3.4B sitting within current liabilities, a non-cash obligation that inflates the liability side without requiring settlement in currency, so the headline ratio likely overstates immediate funding stress. Even so, cash of only $618M against $8.2B of total debt represents a thin self-insurance buffer, and under a scenario where project prepayments slow alongside new construction, the quick ratio of 0.61 offers limited room before external financing would need to be sourced. Because inventory represents only about 41 days of cost, the liquidity profile under severe stress would hinge far more on the pace of receivables collection, where 92-day DSO is the key variable investors should monitor.
Earnings Multiple Is Misapplied Here
With a trailing P/E of 59.27x versus 30.68x forward, per current market data, JCI's earnings multiple is the most commonly misapplied ratio for this model, since net margin of 13.95% sits above the 11.99% operating margin on non-recurring items.
For a business whose reported earnings are repeatedly reshaped by restructuring charges, percentage-of-completion catch-up adjustments, and divestiture gains, trailing net income is a poor denominator because it embeds items management itself does not capitalize into guidance, as the 2025Q4 26.3% net margin versus negative FCF of that quarter illustrates. A normalized operating-margin-based measure or EV/EBITDA on adjusted figures better reflects the earning power of the installed base and service contracts, which is why the 28.5x EV/EBITDA, despite also looking rich against Honeywell's 11.49x, is the more interpretable anchor. Relying on P/E would simultaneously overstate current valuation if non-operating gains reverse and understate it if one-off restructuring costs normalize, so the ratio obscures both tails of the distribution.